Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Trump Doubles Down On Equating Antifa With Neo-Nazis" video.

The protestors at Charlottesville were peaceful until the counter protestors showed up. Both sides became violent and someone died. That is on everyone there. They were looking for trouble and it came. It doesn't matter who killed who, both sides were violent and someone died.
39
And this is why the democrats are losing. Republicans and right wing media are condemning the KKK and Neo Nazis. Many on the left are not condemning BLM and Antifa. This is how they will lose come 2020.
15
Vaness, an individual who aligned with BLM ideas killed two Dallas cops. BLM marched down the streets chanting "Pigs in a blanket fry 'em like bacon". When Alton Sterling was shot BLM protested. Sterling was tased several times, resisted arrest, and was reaching for his gun. BLM support those individuals and feel that cops should not be defending themselves. BLM is a radical hate group that refuses to have an intellectual discussion on the issues. Educate yourself about both groups before typing hysterical garbage about them.
9
beastalchemist, the Neo Nazis were peaceful until Antifa showed up. I do not care who threw the first punch, but the event was peaceful until Anitfa showed up and both sides got violent. Eventually someone died. That is on everyone there. Neither side wanted to be civil and have a civil discussion, both sides were violent. The right wing media and Trump can condemn the KKK and Neo Nazis. Why can't you condemn Antifa? They are just as ignorant, radical and violent.
7
"All I see is them Condemning both in a half-assed insincere way" What do you want them to do? At this point I just see hate from you as nothing the right does will satisfy you. " I could also Straw man NRA for not calling Philando Castile's death a tragedy," That has nothing to do with the NRA. ", or saying "Guns aren't weapons" " When did they say that? Also, they are a tool in many ways. "We both know that not everyone on either side is like that. For someone who tried to be Nonpartisan and say both sides suck, you don't do very well at hiding your conservative edge." What conservative edge? " BLM doesn't want Cops to stop defending themselves, they want justice for the deaths of people who don't deserve to be killed-" We have a justice system for that. Michael Brown was killed in self defense. Private autopsy showed that. There was another black individual that the cop did not shoot. Alton Sterling had a gun, was resisting arrest, and was reaching for it. BLM marched for these people. I am all for keeping the cops in check. I would support BLM hiring private investigators and lawyers to look into these cases. However, when you still cry and march over cases like the Alton Sterling one that is cut and dry, I cannot take your ideas serious. " they are trying to point out the injustices that occur when people like you believe the cops' word without question," I question the cops. I want every killing by a cop to be fully investigated. We have to do that on keeping the government in check. And if BLM wants to do it for any time a black person is kill than fine. But accept the results. Most of those killings are justified. Also, BLM needs to realize that blacks commit a disproportional amount of violent crime. Blacks have lower high school graduate rates and higher rates of single mothers. Solve some of their own problems.
3
The weaver of words, you can blame Antifa for the death of Heather. If Antifa have never showed up the KKK would have made their noise and then gone back to their homes in the woods and listen to their Johnny Rebel records. Antifa showed up and the place became violent. Again, I don't care who threw the first punch, but both sides were violent and someone died. Both sides wanted trouble and they got it.
2
Hal, I did in another comment. They killed Heather in Charlottesville. The protest was peaceful until they showed up. At that point it got violent until someone died. All sides are to blame as they were violent and were looking for trouble.
2
Miles Dixon, what crimes have the KKK and Neo Nazis commit recently? And if you mention about that car incident, he is being charged for murder.
1
"And the problems with my people automatically justify the idea that it's ok to assume that I'm dangerous before I do anything, right? " Very few think that. Those that do are not in position of power and are basically nobodies. "Like statistics are reliable for people who should be taken case by case, since there's not a 100% guarantee that I'm going to hurt you unless I have already made it expressly clear that I have that intention" I never said you were going to hurt people. And people don't feel that way. I go to a gas station that many black individuals go to, I don't feel threaten. "The Conservative Edge I'm referring to is drenched in your talking points-- because obviously statistical facts dictate how we should conduct ourselves when we interact with individuals. " No. Why are you making that claim. Statistically there is a problem in the black community. However, there are other variables in how I will act around someone. If I walk by a black guy on campus I am fine. If I walk by a white person acting like a thug in the ghetto I am on edge. The main difference is that in the ghetto there is higher crime. Race has nothing to do with it. " But my point is that a strong condemnation on either side is insufficient and both sides are bad at doing it." It is not insufficient, neither side wants an intellectual discussion. That is a problem. Until they act like intellectuals so we can solve problems I condemn them.
1
Kawaii, are they getting their way? No. They are not in power. I do not agree with their message but they are not in power. If they were we have civil ways to counter them and remove them. Acting uncivil is what animals do. Are the racists? Yes. Are they in power? No. So ignore them. If you see people who are in power that are racist than point them out and prove it. Then I will help you in removing them. However, right now that is not the case.
1
" the democrats have a higher approval rating. Obama won." Who controls the majority of the offices?
1
No_Love, when the economy booms that is all that matters.
1
Miike Haze, just because they voted for Trump does not mean Trump supports them. Remember, a Bernie supporter shot politicians.
1
People mentioned Antifa, but for the most part people ignored them as they should. They are not in power and are nothing but a bunch of crybabies. Just like the KKK and Neo Nazis. Just in this case someone died so something has to be said.
1
Miles Dixon, again, both sides were violent. You push the envelope far enough eventually someone will act out. There are plenty of examples of Antifa being violent. There was one who hit someone with a bike lock. That can kill someone, however, it didn't happen. When you play with fire enough you will get burn. That is what both sides did and now someone died. Both sides are to blame for this. Neither sides wants an intelligent, civil conversation on the issues. They are both radical and extreme.
1
Sarah, were they violent before Antifa showed up? No. You have no proof they would have looked for violence. Even at that Antifa still showed up and they were violent as well. Saying "they started it" does not excuse you from being wrong.
1
Miles Dixon, they were looking for trouble. And if they weren't than why did they stay when trouble started? When fighting breaks out you leave. Don't be associated with it.
1
Hal, I answered your question. Both sides were violent. If Antifa did not show up no one would have died. Also, if your only standard of a group being violent is killing someone than you are a bad person. Antifa has destroyed property and assaulted people. And they were violent at that rally that escalated to the point where someone died. Why do you defend a violent, radical hate group? Answer me that question.
1
qaz, I am not justifying murder. I am blaming both sides on it. If Antifa would have never showed up there would have not been any violence.
1
Ethno, I agree.
1
CButtonshaw, so if someone has a gun they are automatically going to be violent? I own 4 guns, does that make me violent? Your anti-gun rhetoric is ignorant.
1
Hal Jordan, you are literally defending evil here. In my opinion both sides are responsible for her death as both sides were violent and pushed the envelope until someone died. But if you do not want to think that way than fine, you can. However, to say that Antifa is not violent is objectively false. Hal Jordan, this is why the political left is losing and why Trump won. You guys on the left will defend a radical, hateful, violent group in Antifa in the sickest way possible. In this case you are saying "well gee, Neo Nazis killed someone, so they are worse". BTW, Antifa's rhetoric has killed millions in the past all throughout history if you want to play that game.
1
No_Love, when a terrorist attacks a group of innocent bystanders that is not equal to a situation where both sides were violent and it escalated to someone getting killed.
1
Mingchao Shi, you want to talk about being triggered those anti-protestors were triggered to show up to give those individuals any type of attention. Both sides were violent, both sides were triggered. Why do you defend Antifa? Why do you defend a radical hate group? This is why the democrats are losing. The right and Trump supporters can condemn the KKK and Neo Nazis. You can't condemn a violent hate group like Antifa.
1
Miles Dixon, those are completely different situations, in different states, with different police departments. And that cop has been let go.
1
Miike Haze, having a gun does not make you violent.
1
Joe, Antifa are violent. They have committed acts that put people in danger.
1