Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

You have a great point. I did a lot of things my parents did not approve of. They still support me in life.
2
Easy. The bill is a great example. Democrats do not care about gay people in the end. They only use them for political stunts. So far gay marriage is still allowed, and chances are it will continue to be so. The bill for "marriage equality" is simply the left creating a smoke screen to mask their failures. Instead of trying to create unity in this nation and improve the economy they are pushing these bills making gay individuals as political pawns. As a gay person that should offend them, that the left see them as political points and not people.
2
@sillykyle17 what rights are being taken away here?
2
@salomaogomes7311 it is. I did many things my parents did not approve of. Same with my sisters. They still support me. Maybe if I committed murder or rape they would disown me, which is understandable. But here you have a son who is gay. Also, have you ever thought why he voted against the bill? I oppose the bill and I have no problem with gay people. I see the bill as one, federal government overreach and two, completely worthless and a distraction by the left to mask they fact they are failing as leaders. On that second point, gay people should be mad at the left for them using gay people as a political stunt.
1
The Constitution limits what all governments can do. So it won't be like separate countries. Compare it to a high school where you have different departments, the science department, the history department, the math department, etc. And each one runs their department to suit their subject matter. But there are still some rules set by the school to run. There is a balance.
1
This isn't an anti gay marriage stance voting against that bill. It is opposing a federal overreach. Also, the bill is simply a distraction by the left to mask the fact they are failing as leaders. Gays should be offended that the left is willing to play politics with them, pushing a bill that will never become law while also not trying to improve the economy.
1
@hundejahre how does it make people's lives worse? It seems he loves his son. Besides, ever thought of the real reason he voted against the bill? I do not support that bill, does not mean I hate gay people.
1
@rouskeycarpel1436 I don't support the bill for two reasons. 1. it is federal overreach. Marriage is not an issue Congress should take on, it should be a state issue. 2. It is nothing more than a distraction by the democrats to mask the fact that they are failing as leaders in this nation. Instead of trying to improve the economy they are playing games like this.
1
@223Drone you have openly defending banning LGBT marriage at the federal level several times. Why?
1
@rouskeycarpel1436 you have the 14th amendment. Marriage, like public education, is left up to the states. If states recognize marriage being between a man and a woman then they have to recognize interracial marriage via the 14th amendment. Just like if they provide public education they have to for all races.
1
@1985toyotacamry he voted no on a federal overreaching bill. I oppose the bill because of that, and because of the fact it is nothing more than a distraction by the left as they are completely failures as leaders.
1
Can't speak for him, but I disapprove of the bill for two reasons. 1. It is federal overreach, marriage is a state issue. 2. It is a political stunt by the left to distract from the fact that they are failing as leaders. Instead of trying to improve the economy and the state of the nation, they pushing this pointless bill that does nothing really. On the latter point, gay people should be offended by that very fact that democrats are using them in this political stunt.
1
No hypocrisy here. It was a vote against an overreaching centralized government. Also, the whole bill was pointless and nothing more then a distraction by the left as they are failing.
1
It wasn't a vote against gay marriage. It was a vote against an overreaching centralized government.
1
Is his father a hypocrite? I opposed the bill but I have no problem with gay people or gay weddings. The bill was purely political.
1
The vote was against an overreaching centralized government. Also, the bill is nothing more than a distraction by the left as we enter the midterms when them on the hot seat for their failures.
1
There are these two things to also consider. 1. This bill is seen as federal overreach which many on the right oppose 2. This is basically a distraction by the left to mask the fact that they are failing as leaders as we approach the midterms. They clearly can't fix the economy so they do this
1
Not true. If you are gay you should be mad at the fact that democrats are using you as a political stunt. What is the point of the bill? It is to distract from the fact that they are failing as leaders.
1
This is not hypocrisy. I personally opposed the bill and I have no problem with gays and gay marriage. I opposed it because one, it was federal overreach and two, it is a distraction by the left to mask the fact they are failures as leaders right now. On that latter point, gays should be mad at democrats for them using gays for this political stunt. Instead of doing this democrats should be working on improving the economy as opposed to pushing bills that change nothing in the end. Even if it were to become law it would be challenged in the courts and most likely be struck down as federal government overreach.
1
Don't know the full issue, will have to look, but drag queens these days are going way too far, especially with children.
1
The political stunt is pushing this bill to distract from the fact democrats are failing as leaders. The economy is terrible and this is the game they play.
1
What did he vote on that took a right away?
1
The father voted against a bill that is nothing more than a distraction by the left who have been completely failures. Also, the bill was federal overreach. I oppose the bill myself, does not mean I oppose gay marriage.
1
@UngoogleableMan two things. One, it is federal government overreach. Marriage is a state issue, not a federal one. Next, it is a distraction by the left as we approach the midterms. It is clear they are on the hot seat as they have failed a leaders. Instead of trying to unite us and improve the economy they rather play this game. Really, gay people should be mad for the left playing this political stunt with gay people.
1
@sillykyle17 there is no right to have government recognize your marriage. So there is that to start. Next, this bill was a complete distraction by the left to mask the fact they are failing as leaders in our nation. Why not work to unite us or improve the economy? Gay people should be mad that they are being used this political stunt by the left.
1
@sillykyle17 if over 70% approve of gay rights then it will reflect that in the states. So what you are afraid of? Also, if 70% of people support censorship should we get rid of the 1st amendment?
1
@223Drone name me one right the GOP is looking to take away from LGBT people.
1
Recent history is showing democrats are doing a terrible job at the economy, the truth is that they care more about someone being gay or black as opposed to their character, and with science, covid and climate change shows democrats have no clue what they are talking about.
1