Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. @UCLbNjVnsaYG6leeaPhHarYA healthcare is very much a business arrangement, and culture plays a big role. Good or bad but the US has has a high score in individualism, it is a score of 91 in the Hofstede cultural dimension. We are simply a more individualistic nation. Healthcare is not a human right. You are making an emotional argument there. If you make it a human right you are supporting slavery. "69% of Americans support Medicare for Al" So if 69% supported slavery would you agree with them? " When it comes to procedures that are essential for saving a life" Define that. As I said, many people in Canada die waiting for "elective" hearth surgery. What may be "elective' to you is life saving to others. Covid really exposed that. During covid patients with covid were favored over other patients and as a result cancer screenings went down leading to deaths there. Personal therapy went down leading to increase in substance abuse and deaths there. Fact is that in healthcare resources are limited and something has to give. During covid patients with covid were favored over others leading to deaths. Same in Canada in where they labeled some forms of healthcare as "elective" leading to deaths. " the doctors get you into the ER and save you." In the US no one is denied care at the ER. They may be billed later but they do not have to pay. A big reason why healthcare is so expensive in the US is because, legally, no one is denied care if they go to the ER. Many cannot pay and thus the hospitals have to pick up the tap somehow, so they raise prices elsewhere. In many ways the US does have a system very similar to Canada and it is why the cost is so high. I have my anecdotal stories regarding healthcare. I agree, in the US our system can be improved, but not via M4A. You have to realized a lot of our problems in healthcare in the US is because of government. It is because we have this quasi free market system but a ton of government involvement. We have basically a messed up combination. Now mix in the fact we have around 350 million people and that creates a big mess. You resorting to cursing is proving my point that if I were to have the same debate with Mike that is where he will lead to. In the US we lead the world in access an outcomes in advanced healthcare. That is the fact. Read the book "In Excellent Health" by Dr. Scott Atlas on info on that. Not saying what Canada does bad. There are advantages with their systems. When I had to use healthcare a lot the past year it would have been nice to just use it and not worry about bills. However, on advanced care it becomes a mess and thus that is why other nations trail behind us. But there is an argument to be made should we worry so much about people needing advanced care? That is where culture, again, plays a role.
    1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25.  @j0j0dartiste21  how is culture the weakest excuse? Culture drives how societies act. Culture drives how people act in terms of habit, such as how people view health. Take the state of TX, for example. They love football. Don't you think their love of football will lead to more concussions? I bet it does. But their culture accepts it. So right away I squashed your argument of "How does "culture" affect getting healthcare in the first place?" On elective surgery, that is subjective. If I need knee surgery to me that is not elective as a part of my job requires me to be on my feet and active. So I do not care what some bureaucrat thinks. We saw this with covid recently. You had bureaucrats defining what business is "essential" and what aren't. But those that were labeled as "non-essential" opened up because, to those owners who need to make a living, their business is essential. So sorry, but I am not going to listen to you or some outsider who I have zero personal connection with decide the fate of my life. I can give you sources if you want bud. "i can't take your argument about people dying for waiting on elective heart surgery serious when you have shown many times in the past that you don't care if others die if it's not inconvenient to you." It goes both ways. After covid it was revealed that people on the left do not care about other but only politics. As I said, when you decided to say to some business owners they can't make a living it is clear you do not care about the. Or when I was stripped of my life and had to go to the ER and detox twice because of that and people on the left just said "just wear a mask and hang in there, covid will go away soon", I realized you people do not care about other, period.
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53.  @prophet7885  " the data shows that legal immigrants who lack education, are poor, and have a language barrier contribute more than they get from the government." Yes, legal. I told you I have no problem with legal immigration as they follow the standard to get in. If they are able to follow the standard to get in chances are they will be successful. Just like if someone follows the standard to get into college chances are they will graduate. "ven wanting all non-violent undocumented immigrants currently within the states to become legal residents still doesn't mean I want all immigrants allowed to come in. Try to comprehend that if you can. " Then what is your standard? So you make all undocumented immigrants citizens. And 10 years from now we have more undocumented immigrants, do you make them legal? To me it seems like you have no standards. Also, when you become undocumented it is time for you to leave or get the documentations. If you can't then you need to leave. Follow the current standards. The IRS "estimates". Ok. And again, if they are here illegally they do not pay income taxes. They will only pay a consumption tax. So that is where that estimate comes from. Also, it is more than just taxes. Think of the jobs they take up that Americans can use? Or consider how they do not grow as a person to take on more challenging and productive jobs? You are looking at the flat dollar rate as opposed to other factors. And with income taxes it is the same as welfare, you can't get it if you are hear illegally as you do not have the resources to apply such as a SS number or proof of citizenship. " And on why they aren't deported when data can be collected from them, that's because not everyone is ICE." Sure, but the IRS is supposed to report. Maybe at this point you are showing on poor the federal government is at doing their job. And how am I relying on my feelings? I am explaining to you how you can't just look at money and tax revenue as an indicator as one, there are flaws in such methods and two, there are other factors as well. How about an apartment space they take up that someone else can use? Or a job they take up that someone else can use? Or how where they live they do not have the ability nor desire to improve their living conditions and thus the neighborhood they live ends up being a slum. Several factors. For example, while they may not take in much tax dollars themselves, if they live in a neighborhood that ends up being low income and high crime, how much does that cost society? You need to factor that in. If you are here illegally you are not going to become a doctor, or even a working making a decent wage/salary. You are limited. So it isn't feelings here. In fact, a PEW study says that the average household for an illegal immigrant is 3.1 people at $36,000 a year. These are not people who are going to contribute a lot to a local community and improve it. That cost society money and resources. Look at the big picture and not cherry picked data points. "Someone else: "This is absolutely against the scientific and medical consensus." whyamimrpink78: "Maybe because they are on your side. That's my problem."" When was this? What context? Again, you keep trying to quote me as if you are trying to make me look bad but when you do not give context that makes you look bad. How am I inconsistent? If the local government violates the Constitution then the federal government steps in. The Civil Rights Act was unnecessary as we have the 14th amendment. "When I brought up the Civil Rights Act of 1957 was in effect prior to that intervention, you flipped on that since that would mean you had to accept the Civil Rights Acts. " Nope. Still consistent. The law is unnecessary because of the 14th amendment. " So now, what should the Supreme Court have done to enforce the 14th amendment that the governor was violating?" Easy, say the local government is violating it and tell them to stop. If they don't then they can have the governor or mayor or whatever government official violating the Constitution be removed. If that does not work you then go to force with the military. No Civil Rights Act needed. So where am I not consistent?
    1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93.  @patrickbrogan8770  "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Ok, break it down. Treaties are a part of foreign affairs as in states cannot do treaties, only the federal government can. Also, from Cornell Law School " It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect." Basically, what it does is allow the federal government to enforce the Constitution if needed. The Constitution outlines the limits of governments, and if a state government is violating the Constitution the federal government can intervene. But as mentioned in Cornell Law, the federal government cannot veto state laws. " That means, for example, states don’t have the right to allow slavery cuz the 13th amendment reigns supreme. " I agree. "Also, I’m pretty sure it’s small businesses with under a certain amount of workers who are exempt from OSHA laws" That is 100% false. It is similar to the EPA. Watch the movie Tapped, it is about bottle water. In one part of the movie they discussed a bottle company that did not have to follow EPA regulations because they only operated in one state. I worked for a small business and never once did we ever have to follow federal regulations as we did not operate across state lines.
    1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1