General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

whyamimrpink78
The Humanist Report
comments

Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

Why? She broke the law. 20 weeks is a long time.
3
@dorino9057 and that is on the states to decide. Besides, chances are what she did was illegal in all 50 states.
3
True. Why wait 20 weeks?
3
@ladydeerheart1 I feel those breaking the laws should be punished. What is your point?
2
@Sylphinator it has been 28 weeks. How long do you want to give a woman? This is where abortion support gets complex. On the surface many may say they support legal abortion. But in a case of 28 weeks I bet there is low support here unless the woman's live is in danger. And Roe v Wade being overturn is correct. Abortion is not written anywhere in the Constitution, thus it is a state issue. .
2
@zedwolf1589 how is the father responsible? If she would have had the kid he would have had to pay child support.
2
@jorenvanderark3567 they never said it was settled law. And abortion is not a right. Thus it is a state issue just like with murder laws, K-12 education, traffic laws, etc.
2
@FrozEnbyWolf150 NE has it up to 20 weeks. And as for health issues to the woman, almost all support abortion in that case. Killing in self defense is different in that a person is a direct threat to my life. A baby in a woman typically is not.
2
@jeezumcrow8655 it actually isn't that hard. At that point, why are women having sex with deadbeats? Sure, force the father to care for the kid. I agree with that.
2
It was 28 weeks in, why did she wait for so long? On the 10 year old she could have got the abortion in her state legally. She just went over state lines and the doctor made a fuss about it for political reasons. You guys are insane.
2
Well, one justice cannot define what a woman is. So do definitions matter?
1
@JanglesPrime999 it is the truth. It is a legit question.
1
@JanglesPrime999 in law you need definitions. It is an important question. You have laws like Title IX and the draft that depends on someone's gender.
1
@JanglesPrime999 it should already be legally defined. That is the point.
1
@MichelleHell "I know the first part of that word is triggering for you" Not really, but way to make assumptions. On the legal grounds words have clear definitions. That is how we enforce laws. We have laws that depend on someone's gender. Thus, they are defined. In elementary school you learn about definitions being attached to words.
1
@JanglesPrime999 so a set of standards was created to define what a planet is? That sounds like what happens in law.
1
@JanglesPrime999 even at that the law needs definition. Right now there is a legal definition of a woman.
1
@JanglesPrime999 no, not really. I don't see anything about gender expression.
1
@JanglesPrime999 if gender expression is there then many men can define themselves as a woman, join women's sports in the NCAA and get full ride scholarships. Do you support that?
1
@JanglesPrime999 answer my question. So men can say they are women and take scholarships away from women? Do you know why Title IX laws exist?
1
@223Drone ok, you answer this. If the definition of what a gender is is based on how people act, can men say they are women and get athletic scholarships?
1
@JanglesPrime999 so you are saying biological men can get scholarships for women's sports as long as they act like a woman? How is that equality? Again, do you know why Title IX exists? "I mean you are talking about a fraction of a tiny number of people in the country. " Sure, I agree. So don't cater to them. " Or we could just make college free and we wouldn't have to worry about the sports-ball anymore." That will be a disaster. Do you know how the NCAA functions and how much it helps people lives and future? How do you handle the NCAA and scholarship limits if you make college free? Small schools would be screwed.
1
@JanglesPrime999 sports in college has a lot of value. It isn't just for the athletes. You have students that get experience in marketing, broadcasting, film editing, management, athletic training and thus healthcare, etc. It gives students that hands on experience. It goes way beyond the athletes. Heck, you have tutors that are assigned to work with the athletes to teach them. If you make college "free" you remove the scholarship limits in the NCAA and thus the larger schools get all the athletes and smaller schools get nothing causing their programs to fold. "One state passed a law against trans kids in sports" Great, I agree. You are talking about a complete lack of balance. The olympics are not that special anymore after they decided to hold them in China while preaching freedom and equality.
1
@JanglesPrime999 If you make college free you remove the investment part of college which is where the true value lies. Anyone can look up information online or in a public library and learn material. The value of college is in the investment. "Oh, by the way, great job cutting out the rest of that line about all the time and effort that state passed a law not one of the lawmakers knew it only affect one middle school kid" Nope, stop the bleeding right away. One trans person starts it will grow. So you feel men should compete against women? So we should do away with women's sports and just make them coed?
1
Oh please. People like Mike love these large institutions. The left is cheering on these large institutions.
1
@robertpresley1503 by cheering on the Biden administration. Support of the vaccine mandate. Support of the left in general.
1
Abortion is legal in NE up to 20 weeks. That is a long time. How long do you want it to be?
1
@salomaogomes7311 wow, really?
1
@GMMesmerize well, here. Say that 17 year old is not a responsible person in life, commits crime, and cost society more. And say that fetus, if born and allowed to live, becomes a great inventor bettering society?
1
So when the court orders Alex Jones to give up his texts people on the left like Mike cheer. But when the court demand Facebook does the same thing Mike complains. Figures.
1
@yfna1 sure, why not? People said Alex Jones broke the law so the court said to reveal the texts. Same here with this girl. She broke the law, reveal the messages. How are they different?
1
@yfna1 both breaking the law, so both cases are the same here. No differences. If you want to go down the path if the laws are just we can. Defamation is free speech. Here you have a girl murdering a child. It was 28 weeks along. So we can go down that route.
1
@yfna1 defamation should be free speech. The idea of free speech is that the government cannot punish you. Not saying there won't be consequences, but the consequences should not come from the government. She is being charged with an illegal abortion, so there is that. And many who are against abortions feel it is murder.
1
@yfna1 the punishment was handed by a jury, now what if Alex Jones does not pay? So you are saying Alex Jones does not have to pay? And consequences he can face is someone can defame him. Or people not watching his show. Many feel that abortion is murder, especially at 28 weeks. My niece was born at 28 weeks and she is still alive. At 28 weeks it is basically a baby.
1
@joshuapowers4623 the reason why most issues are left up to the states is because basically all issues have a subjective and objective side to them. With leaving it to the states the people of those states can work out the subjective side on issues. Using abortion as an example. Objectively it is killing a living thing. Don't give me the whole "clump of cells' argument, it is a living thing. Is it human? Well, many will say that early on, objectively, no. But many see it as a potential human and want to keep it alive. And in a subjective sense feel killing that living thing is wrong. On the other hand, objectively, as in the case of this woman, many cannot afford to have a kid. So you end up with a kid in a poor household, or in foster care where that can, in many ways, harm society. And there are objective measures for that. And in a subjective sense many feel that placing that kid in that situation is worse off than aborting it. There is a reason why political issues like abortion continue to have arguments. The are complex and there is the subjective part where there is no clear right or wrong answer. As for rights, they are more or less limits on the government to give power to the people to challenge the government if needed. With abortion that is not the case. Same with murder, stealing, etc.
1
@yourneighborhoodfriendlyme4242 the unborn child's live is impacted. There is that argument. And this case is late term. And law enforcement can dive into your sexual health and medical status. They do it all the time in cases. Besides, and be honest, do you support a mental evaluation in order to own a gun? Many do. Many support a mental evaluation before someone can purchase a gun.
1
@donbianconi8446 I saw the 9th amendment. To start, not one single court cases cited that amendment as the main amendment. Next, it is referred to rights at that time that were common with the people. Abortion was a non issue in that time so it is not a right. That is different than owning property, or owning a slave which were common by people at that time. Thus, slavery was ended with a Constitutional amendment.
1
@donbianconi8446 so I should be free to kill people in life I do not like?
1
@luvitluvitbaby which is going to court.
1
@jeezumcrow8655 marriage is a state issue. On that if a state decides to recognize marriage they have to recognize interracial marriage via the 14th amendment.
1
@logansmall5148 not a moot point. Many on the left are pushing for it while also crying for medical privacy when it comes to abortion.
1
@theoford753 in many cases it is subjective if a law is just or not. I never said it was black and white. It is actually very gray. That is why I support state rights. It handles the gray area.
1
@melgibson7313 it does. Almost all issues have a subjective side to it. How you feel about an issue I will feel differently and someone else will feel differently. For example, how harsh should we punish a killer? How much should we really tax someone? How should I kids be taught in schools? It is highly subjective. How people feel in one state is completely different than in another state. What will work in one state will fail in another.
1
@223Drone it is supported by science. At 28 weeks the child can live outside of the womb.
1
@donbianconi8446 there is a method to change the Constitution. The night amendment was referring to already set rights at that time such as owning property, owning slaves, wanting to pursuit marriage, wanting to have children and so on. You can see them as being grandfathered in. Abortion was not an issue at that time. By your standard murder is a right, same with stealing, harassments, drunk driving, etc. That is why the 9th amendment has never been the main amendment cited in any court case. It has always been cited as a supporting amendment. Because by your standard I can get drunk, steal your car, and cause a major accident killing people claiming the 9th amendment gave me that right.
1
@donbianconi8446 ok, so murder is a right according to you. " It is a society that decides those rights," By voting at the local level as what is done with abortion in most states.
1
@lisabagdonjones1950 no, we are discussing rights that are not listed in the Constitution. By Don's standard abortion is a right because of the 9th amendment. So via the 9th amendment murder is a right.
1
@donbianconi8446 "I said it is for society to decide" Sure, at the state level via voting, like how it always have been. " I never once said every act under the sun is a right" I am confused then. Does the 9th amendment make abortion a right? if so, why? And why isn't murder a right in general? "society or the majority of us, are cool with letting a woman decide." Great, then vote for it at the state level. That is how the system is designed and for great reasons. " No doctor is going to abort a healthy soon to be baby in month 8-9." It has happened before. "So you are arguing that people do vary in their opinions yet the minority should decide for every woman in the US." Never said that. I support leaving abortion up to the states where usually the majority decide.
1
@223Drone "GOP state leaders implement abortion bans without the support of the people." So GOP state leaders, voted in by the people, are going against the people's wants? That makes zero sense.
1
@donbianconi8446 "My boys mom carried into 7th month then caught a blood clot in her placenta ... If she had to carry that dead fetus and birth it, idk if she would have recovered and we might not have our son today." Basically every state has it so if the women's life is in danger there are options.
1
@lisabagdonjones1950 I heard of that case. It as legal to perform an abortion on her. That was pure political show.
1
@lisabagdonjones1950 the doctor who made it public is highly political and also the does state that if the woman is in danger an abortion can be performed. The state's AG said that an abortion in that case would have been legal. Also, when it was found out that the rapist was an illegal immigrant the left dropped the story.
1
@donbianconi8446 ok, where?
1
@223Drone how about you give me examples bud. Still waiting...........
1
@223Drone being honest. You cannot provide anything, you expect others to do it. Do you have others wipe your ass for you?
1
@melgibson7313 kid, you have not given me examples. If so, try again. It should not be that hard. Fact is you have nothing kid.
1
@223Drone how about you give me examples and not rely on others to wipe your ass.
1
@FirstNameLastName-wt5to the person you just responded to will provide you nothing. Just a heads up. You are going to end up debating a pull string doll that says the same phrases over and over again.
1
@christineherrmann205 well, the police state is what the left wants. They just cheered on sending the FBI to a political opponent. Also, the left cheered on how Alex Jones was treated. You reap what you sow.
1
@nixipixi8945 well, talk to your teachers and say you do not want to use facebook. I don't have a facebook account. And for places that use it for communication, or as their website and so on I either avoid or tell them straight up I don't have one and never will.
1
@FirstNameLastName-wt5to the person you are responding to won't give you anything.
1
@FirstNameLastName-wt5to being honest, it is like you are arguing with a pull string doll. They will just say the same thing over and over again. That is that person's intelligence level.
1
Nope, hate it. What is funny is that the left was cheering on the court demanding Alex Jones give up his tweets.
1
@robertpresley1503 how so? Weren't you guys cheering about what happened to Alex Jones?
1
It was already against the law as in NE you can't have an abortion after 20 weeks. She also did it without a doctor which is also illegal.
1
She broke the law.
1
@salomaogomes7311 yes it was.
1
@LittleAl016 yes it as. NE laws has it that you have to do the abortion prior to 20 weeks. That was still the law under Roe v Wade.
1
@223Drone why did she wait for 28 weeks? Also, they claim to have little money but have their laptops and smart phones?
1
@LittleAl016 yes it was.
1
@LittleAl016 In NE after 24 weeks abortion is illegal. Here she waited 28 weeks. She also performed the abortion on herself which is illegal and buried it herself which is also illegal.
1
@makeinubaka it took you that long to decide? I am more concerned about that on your part. How long does it take you to decide what to wear? Or how long does it take you to decide what to eat? Sorry, but that sounds like a you problem.
1
@makeinubaka I kind of doubt that.
1
@makeinubaka so why didn't you talk to your mother earlier? And the second time? So this happened more than once? That is another problem right there. Many support abortion on the whole rare, safe and legal stance.
1
@LittleAl016 if you are referring to me how am I a fascist?
1