General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
whyamimrpink78
The Humanist Report
comments
Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.
@EgonSupreme not a Crowder fan. This looked bad on Sam. Sam had to have someone lie to Crowder to ambush his show. Crowder was ready to take on someone else and that someone else diverted to Sam where they ganged up on him. This was Sam punching up.
4
The problem with these debates is that they are pointless. No matter who really won both sides will say their guy one. Next, neither Sam nor Crowder are experts. So it all becomes show. Along with that, Crowder is much bigger than Sam, so Crowder has nothing to gain and Sam has a lot to gain and nothing to lose.
2
In debates like these it is mostly show where people said their guy won. A real debate involves experts, but they are boring to most people.
2
@abdul-rahimdahman3300 not really. Steven has more followers and a much better show production wise. Sam's show, production wise, is a mess. Funny thing is that Sam has other jobs as well such as doing a character for the show Bob's Burgers. But his show is a mess. It isn't like Crowder has anything to lose but more of why give attention to Sam at this point?
1
Who is being a coward? Sam lied about any debate set up with Crowder. And here Sam basically pranked called Crowder and claimed he won. Not mature on his part.
1
@DiThi the problem with Sam is that a debate with him is pointless. Really, a debate in this situation is pointless because no matter what both sides will say their man won. So what is the point? I saw Sam debate Kirk and Sam just said "google it" a few times.
1
True. What they did was the same as sucker punching someone and claiming you beat them in a boxing match. The left never wants to discuss anything. Look at Sam's debate with the caller who is a men's rights activist. Immediately Sam and his crew dismissed him. When that happens you can't debate someone.
1
@vivalaleta Crowder never skipped out on planned debates. The only "evidence" Sam had were emails where the email addresses were censored.
1
@muuuuuud you do know that abusing substances can lead to your body having high blood pressure making you at great risk of death if a little bit of excitement were to occur.
1
Crowder did not follow the show, Crowder has a team of workers doing it. Sam looked bad here. He had someone lie to Crowder and then ambushed him. This is Sam punching up. And it does show they cannot debate Crowder, they can only play games. Not a fan of Crowder but this is why his show is way better than Sam "uh, um, uh" Crowder.
1
@dougn2350 not true
1
It looked bad on Sam. This is similar to trashing someone's car and running away saying "we got him".
1
@a.d.3606 you are right on Sam being a small fish jumping in a big pond. Sam had to have someone lie to Crowder and then ambushed his show. That is not winning, that sucker punching someone and saying you won.
1
One, the college students are not unprepared. They do not have to approach him. Next, this was good on Sam. Sam forced his way on Crowder's show. Again, no one forces college students to approach Crowder. Also, people do avoid Sam because Sam is not an honest character. Take the recent debate with the men's right activist and how Sam and his crew immediately dismissed him. When your opponent dismisses you there is not need to debate them.
1
True.
1
@sparklyunicorn5431 Sam was doing basically a prank car and laughing. Not mature.
1