Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

  1. The FBI is different than the police, way different.
    1
  2.  @IceAxe1940  federal laws are designed differently and the people have far less control over them. They are essentially becoming no better than the other alphabet agencies at the federal level. I don't support defunding but I support reform. Even with there are other agencies that support federal laws such as the IRS, OSHA, border patrol, etc. Seems like a chaotic mess to me.
    1
  3.  @gnomechomsky2524  windy day where you live?
    1
  4.  @IceAxe1940  they are becoming a part of the federal overreach. Even in history, they have spied on people and done questionable things.
    1
  5.  @joshuachristofferson9227  it does look bad and is a big reason why so many supported Trump. Many see the establishment, especially on the left have gone insane, or have become fascists and power hungry. Trump is not in office, why does the left continue to obsess over him? They should focus more on improving the economy, uniting us, making peoples' lives better. Instead they harp on Trump.
    1
  6. Because this is federal government overreach by the left. Just like how the left just added thousands of IRS agents to go after your wallet.
    1
  7. Almost all on the right hate the Patriot Act.
    1
  8. This is pure corruption and federal government overreach by the left. It is so sad how fascist they have become.
    1
  9. What law was broken?
    1
  10. You just described mainly the left and establishments in general.
    1
  11. So you rather live in a bubble?
    1
  12.  @kiesarisunny13  because I do not live in a bubble.
    1
  13.  @melgibson7313  so how do I live in a bubble when I watch this channel?
    1
  14. It is so cute that little Mike defends the corrupt establishment here.
    1
  15.  @louis1443  "They had to build a case" The irony is rich here. Trump brings cases to court on election fraud and they get thrown out. I made the claim many times that it takes time to build a case. So how about you apply your logic to the issue of election fraud? Why not do an investigation there as opposed to immediately dismiss it?
    1
  16.  @davidfaustino4476  this is all political. Notice how they are waiting until we approach the midterm to do all of this? What do democrats have to run on? Nothing. They keep Trump in the picture because all they have to run off of is orange man bad.
    1
  17.  @ineedbigdrink8509  "are you implying that the courts didn’t go through the process of assessing the presence/quality of evidence before dismissal JUST for election fraud cases?" No, i am saying there was no investigation. Look at how long the Russia investigation take. People will argue that Trump had all his court cases thrown out and that is evidence of no fraud. In reality there was no investigation to see if there is evidence, so the Trump team had nothing at that time. That is fine. What isn't fine is that there is no investigation being done.
    1
  18.  @ineedbigdrink8509  because there was no investigation. Look at how long it took to do the Russia investigation? After years of hearing about Russia and the 2016 election, the left immediately dismissed any idea of election fraud on one of the most unique elections of all time. "Everything I read concluded that most judges dismissed cases after their lawyers failed to present adequate evidence for specific claims " Because there was no investigation. I think you are stumbling on the same conclusion I am.
    1
  19.  @melgibson7313  what lies? List them. As usual you won't.
    1