Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

This is the law. I know the radical left want chaos in elections as they can't win fairly, but we need order in elections.
1
@millabasset1710 if states are feuding amongst each other the federal government will step in. The role of the federal government is to deal with foreign affairs and commerce between states. Everything else is left up to the states. TheSuperRatt is correct. A centralized government will be very oppressive where the people have little control. At the local level the people have more control.
1
@cryptbeast3222 what you said can go either way. This is why we have strict limits on the federal government.
1
@cryptbeast3222 many states are left wing. The US is a large nation. We have states larger than many nations. In the end the role of the federal government is to deal with foreign affairs and commerce between states. Everything else is to be left up to the states. The more local government is the more control the people have over it. The more local government is the more it caters to the people.
1
They broke the law, how this gut wrenching? This just further confirms people on the left want chaos in elections as they will not win much if there weren't chaos.
1
@ben5154 they broke the law, end of story. One even admitted to it.
1
@melgibson7313 considering you think pigeons know how to play chess I question you mental state kid.
1
That is all a cop can say. At times he can't say what for as the person being arrested can use it in his defense.
1
@knavishknight easy example. When I was arrested for a DUI the cop said he was arresting me on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. I asked him what can I do and all he said was get a lawyer and talk to the prosecuting attorney. He could not go beyond that because if he gives me bad legal advice as if he fully knows the law I can use that against him and ultimately the county (it was a deputy). People have their role. The cops in these cases show up saying they have a warrant for these individuals arrest where the warrant said it was for voter fraud. Beyond that they can't say anything because that is not their position. That is the position of the prosecuting attorney. Back to my DUI. The prosecuting attorney told me the law and gave me an offer, and SIS, Suspension Imposition of Sentence. I talked to a lawyer and he said that is a good deal. The lawyer also said, for a certain amount, they could get me off completely due to many factors. I saved my money and took the SIS. If the cop would have said that I would receive and SIS, and the prosecuting attorney said there would be no SIS offered to me, now I have a strong case against the county (again, sheriff deputy) where I was lied to by a member serving the county. That I went into the situation thinking I will get an SIS, so I did not hire a lawyer right away. But when the PA did not give me that offer I can easily argue I was giving misinformation and that is an easy case to win causing major damage to the county and the sheriff in that county. See, easy to give an example. Helps when you actually read a lot and also leave one's home and gain real world experience.
1
@223Drone so I was never an alcoholic even though I know a lot about alcoholism and experience it first hand, even the withdraws. You are very pathetic at this point.
1
A lot of times they can't. They get a warrant and take them to jail. The judge tells then what for. Police cannot give false information or it can be used in favor of the person being charged.
1
@knavishknight easy example. When I was arrested for a DUI the cop said he was arresting me on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. I asked him what can I do and all he said was get a lawyer and talk to the prosecuting attorney. He could not go beyond that because if he gives me bad legal advice as if he fully knows the law I can use that against him and ultimately the county (it was a deputy). People have their role. The cops in these cases show up saying they have a warrant for these individuals arrest where the warrant said it was for voter fraud. Beyond that they can't say anything because that is not their position. That is the position of the prosecuting attorney. Back to my DUI. The prosecuting attorney told me the law and gave me an offer, and SIS, Suspension Imposition of Sentence. I talked to a lawyer and he said that is a good deal. The lawyer also said, for a certain amount, they could get me off completely due to many factors. I saved my money and took the SIS. If the cop would have said that I would receive and SIS, and the prosecuting attorney said there would be no SIS offered to me, now I have a strong case against the county (again, sheriff deputy) where I was lied to by a member serving the county. That I went into the situation thinking I will get an SIS, so I did not hire a lawyer right away. But when the PA did not give me that offer I can easily argue I was giving misinformation and that is an easy case to win causing major damage to the county and the sheriff in that county. See, easy to give an example. Helps when you actually read a lot and also leave one's home and gain real world experience.
1
@knavishknight ""There's a difference between not going into the law and not knowing it. Also... the cop (by law) has to tell the person what law they've broken if they put them under arrest (if asked)." They can tell them what law they broken based on the information they have. It can be via a warrant, or in my case, suspicion of DUI based on DUI test I took, which cops are trained to do. Beyond that they cannot give more information. In this case with voter fraud, the cops are not going to discuss exactly what laws they broke and how, and what they can do. That is not their job. Their job is to arrest those individuals based on the warrant given my a judge. There are reasons why we have cops, and then judges, and then juries, and prosecuting attorneys, etc. Not one person doing it all.
1
@knavishknight you make this too easy bud.
1
@jmb3608 the problem is that if summoned many won't show up. In the US we have seen too many violent incidents on routine arrests. Too many times cops have been harmed and killed in routine arrests. Someone is a criminal and you don't know what they are capable of. "If you were drunk, you were much more dangerous to other people than they were." What do you base that off of? Many times a sober person can be very dangerous. As a cop you don't know. You mail these people a summons and they can go as far as moving out of the state. Now great, now they are gone. How are you going to catch them now? Spend more money tracking them down? Voter fraud exists, and we need to handle it. Mike here is like most leftists. They want chaos in elections as that is really the only way they can truly win at this point. The far left has no success to run off of.
1
@jmb3608 just so you know, DeadlyMargiKarp223 never supports anything he says. Ask him what SC case gives cops the power to lie. He won't name one. He just repeats the same things over and over again. And when I ask for sources he never gives them. You, at least, gave a thoughtful and respectful comment. I disagree knowing what goes on in our nation and what I have seen before. But your comment had thought and I can respect that. And for the record, I was arrested for a DUI. How would I know about being offered an SIS for example?
1
@223Drone care to give me the SC case that allows cops to legally lie to people they arrest?
1
It is their job. In many cases they cannot get into details of the actual law because the person being arrested can use it in their defense. Cops are not judges or lawyers.
1
@primal9238 easy example. When I was arrested for a DUI the cop said he was arresting me on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. I asked him what can I do and all he said was get a lawyer and talk to the prosecuting attorney. He could not go beyond that because if he gives me bad legal advice as if he fully knows the law I can use that against him and ultimately the county (it was a deputy). People have their role. The cops in these cases show up saying they have a warrant for these individuals arrest where the warrant said it was for voter fraud. Beyond that they can't say anything because that is not their position. That is the position of the prosecuting attorney. Back to my DUI. The prosecuting attorney told me the law and gave me an offer, and SIS, Suspension Imposition of Sentence. I talked to a lawyer and he said that is a good deal. The lawyer also said, for a certain amount, they could get me off completely due to many factors. I saved my money and took the SIS. If the cop would have said that I would receive and SIS, and the prosecuting attorney said there would be no SIS offered to me, now I have a strong case against the county (again, sheriff deputy) where I was lied to by a member serving the county. That I went into the situation thinking I will get an SIS, so I did not hire a lawyer right away. But when the PA did not give me that offer I can easily argue I was giving misinformation and that is an easy case to win causing major damage to the county and the sheriff in that county. See, easy to give an example. Helps when you actually read a lot and also leave one's home and gain real world experience.
1
@primal9238 very easy to give an example. There are a reason why judges are not out arresting people. That is the job for police. We also have prosecuting attorneys for a reason.
1
@primal9238 other nations have different cultures. You really can't compare. In the US police are trained. Do you think we just hire any bum off the street?
1
@primal9238 I agree the training can be improved, but that is on the state and local level. I also agree having overweight cops is an issue, but obesity is an issue all around. Consider Dick Levine, and obese man who thinks they are a woman has a major influence in healthcare in our nation. Do you not see that as a problem? A cop should not give legal advice beyond hiring a lawyer. That is not the cop's position. It is especially important as the cop does not know what the prosecuting attorney will do in that case. Cops understand the law to the level they need to know. If a warrant for an arrest is issued they do the arrest. If they suspect someone of DUI based on giving a test they are trained to give, they can arrest them. It isn't like they are going in completely blind. Let us compare it to my job. I do apps as a scientist at my job. When it comes to sales I do not discuss price with a customer, the sales person does. I have a general idea on how much something cost. And I can gauge what a person's application works for them. But when it comes to discussing price, the I completely leave it to the sales person. Why? They could be having a special deal, a discount, credit, etc. Same with law. A cop will know when to arrest someone. But beyond that they do not know the full law, what the prosecuting attorney will do, what the judge will do, etc. All they will say is get a lawyer.
1