Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

  1. This is small government as it limits the powers of the federal government giving more powers to local governments.
    2
  2. It isn't being against contraceptives but about sticking to the standard. There is no right to contraceptive.
    2
  3.  @cooldrop02  true.
    2
  4.  @kurisu7885  there is restriction to a lot of things. is an 18 year old allowed to buy beer? I am not saying I agree with the law, but it exists.
    2
  5.  @cooldrop02  to make it a right it has to be in the Constitution. There is a process for that. If congress were to pass some sort of law it would be a federal law but states would still have the freedom to create restrictions which is normal. Look up how amendments can be added to the Constitution.
    2
  6.  @evielikeshugs1055  government will play a role in your life. The more local government is the more control you have over it.
    1
  7.  @samuelbekele3601  the more local government is the more control you have over it.
    1
  8.  @salomaogomes7311  the more local government is the more power the people have. I suggest you get involved in your local community and know your neighbor.
    1
  9.  @salomaogomes7311  I suggest you get involved in your local community and get to know you neighbor. I find it funny how people on the left live in a hole but then say they know what people want. No wonder the left loved the covid lockdowns, they were never active outside of their homes to begin with. They live in imagination land being in their home.
    1
  10.  @melgibson7313  think about what? I am currently thinking about what to have for breakfast.
    1
  11. With democrats, yes. Things are terrible under their leadership so they need a distraction.
    1
  12.  @SOZO_xo  because democrats cannot run on their record, so they need distractions.
    1
  13. Almost no one. it is being against an overreaching centralized government.
    1
  14.  @mehdihatami3391  how so? Please explain.
    1
  15.  @mehdihatami3391  what federal bans are being proposed?
    1
  16.  @theodorevibritannia7988  the guy said there are federal bans being proposed. How about you tell me which ones. I am not see any.
    1
  17.  @theodorevibritannia7988  if you have facts on your side, you should clearly be able to give me facts on the federal bans being imposed.
    1
  18.  @mehdihatami3391  what bill did he write to propose a ban?
    1
  19.  @mehdihatami3391  looking into it I am not seeing anything where McConnell is pushing to ban contraceptives. Even if he was, I would oppose it as he would be pushing a federal ban which, again, violates state rights. You see, unlike you I can be consistent. You are fine with federal government overreach when you agree with the actions, but when it happens in a way you disagree you freak out.
    1
  20.  @mcnoodles3010  there are standards. The 14th amendment bans discrimination. Now where in the Constitution does it mention contraceptives?
    1
  21.  @melgibson7313  yes it does. That is the standard. Seriously kid, that is the standard. A kindergartner like you does not like standards. Irony.
    1
  22.  @223Drone  oh, my bad. I forgot about you. You want a federal ban on contraceptives.
    1
  23. You do not want an overreaching, centralized government. That is all this is pushing. If the things Mike says are so popular it will be reflected at the state level. Also, this is a big distraction by the left as we head into the midterms where democrats are not doing well.
    1
  24.  @cooldrop02  the Constitution lists out our rights. The constitution restricts what laws can be created. There is no right to contraceptives. Also, you don't want to go down the path of an overreaching, centralized government. Along with that, this whole thing is just a distraction by the left as we head into the midterms with the nation being in bad shape. How about they try to fix the economy.
    1
  25.  @cooldrop02  rights are in the Constitution. There is a way to change the Constitution.
    1
  26.  @cooldrop02  who is preventing contraceptives? I find it funny how on the left if government is not highly involved something will cease to exist. As if government is the reason why life exists.
    1
  27.  @kurisu7885  the Constitution lays out our rights and the duties of the federal government, period.
    1
  28.  @cooldrop02  there is no right to contraceptives, period.
    1
  29.  @cooldrop02  how so?
    1
  30.  @cooldrop02  where in the Constitution does it state that contraceptives is a right? Nowhere. So it becomes a state issue. With that said I will tell you straight up there will be essentially little to no restrictions on contraceptives. The left is freaking out over nothing and/or using this as a distraction to hide the fact that under the democrats our nation is a mess and Biden sucks.
    1
  31.  @salomaogomes7311  that is the standard. We need to stick to standards. If we don't have standards then we will act like a bunch of 12 year olds saying "that's mine" or saying "I am going to tell on you" and so on. So you say "what are you, 12" when a 12 year old would not want standards. Irony.
    1
  32.  @angie99656  your comment is pathetic. This whole thing is political. Who is banning contraceptives? No one. This is purely a political game from the left because democrats are in trouble as we approach the midterms. The nation is a mess and democrats are about to lose a lot of seats in Congress and can't defend who is already one of the worse presidents of all time. So they have to play this political game.
    1
  33.  @salomaogomes7311  define "decent human beings". At one point slaver owners were saw as decent human beings.
    1
  34.  @cooldrop02  law makers can't just make laws without limits. That is how Jim Crow laws were created, there were no limits in place (well there were, they just weren't enforced) to say what type of laws can and cannot be created. There is no right to birth control, thus it becomes a state issue, just like drinking alcohol are state laws. That is the standard. We stick to it. I bet you would hate it if the federal government created a national ban on birth control. But that is the standard you want to set, allowing the federal government to have that power and you having little to no say in it.
    1
  35.  @cooldrop02  you are saying create laws without limits when you say "The standard is that lawmakers make the laws. " There are limits. Without them you get laws like Jim Crow laws. "I'm glad that you admit that they were actively going against the Constitution when they were ruling on the legality of Jim Crow in the Supreme court" At that time the SC was wrong. They eventually got it right. No system is perfect, but the SC did rule correctly in saying Jim Crow laws are unconstitutional. Just like now the SC got the Roe v Wade ruling correct. Again, no system is perfect, but can you think of a better one?
    1
  36.  @melgibson7313  have you read the Constitution? As of this point I doubt you have.
    1
  37.  @cooldrop02  also, you talk about lifetime appoints of SC justices, a reason for that is that they have to make unpopular decisions at times that can ruin them in society if they were to leave the bench. Take Brown v Board and how many hated that ruling. Now imagine the justices ruling on that and then having to find a career after time on the bench. It would be tough. Lifetime appointments is to eliminate a situation in what you see in politics where someone gets a seat in the cabinet, make some changes in policy, and then later get a job for some big company their policy changes helped.
    1
  38.  @cooldrop02  the SC is not supposed to have the average man's interest in mind. In fact, them thinking that way is why Jim Crow stuck around for so long. The average man supported Jim Crow laws, and the SC allowed them to exist. The SC is supposed to make choices that are Constitutional no matter how unpopular they are. The SC should have ruled Jim Crow laws unconstitutional from the very beginning. It would have been a very unpopular decision but the correct one. That is why we do not vote for SC justices and why they have lifetime appointments. " saying that the standard is that lawmakers are there to make laws is not saying that they can make a law without limits." Yes it does as you have to bring up that there are limits. In fact, Congress should know the limits so they are not wasting time making laws that will get squashed in the SC. That is with this law, it is clearly unconstitutional which is why many members of Congress did not even read it. It is a waste of time and purely a political stunt by the left to blow smoke to mask the fact that under them and Biden things are terrible.
    1
  39.  @cooldrop02  the SC is there to rule if a law is Constitutional. Doesn't matter how the average man feels. At one point the average man felt slavery was OK, the Constitution changed that. The average man supported Jim Crow laws, that is why they existed for so long and it took the SC to change them.
    1
  40.  @cooldrop02  when the Constitution was written black individuals were treated as 3/5 of a person. Was that in their interest? Or at one point banned alcohol.
    1
  41.  @melgibson7313  typical non response from you.
    1
  42.  @cooldrop02  ok, what are you saying? I agree with what you are saying? i am saying that the Constitution is not about having the average man in mind. If the average man wanted a federal ban on speech the 1st amendment will stop that.
    1
  43.  @melgibson7313  no, it is that you are not responding to my comments with a rebuttal, just insults. It shows that I have the upper hand at this point.
    1
  44.  @cooldrop02  as I said, say the average man does not like racist speech and pushed to pass laws to silence racists. The Constitution does not allow that. "It's like you assume that the people who will read these messages will not have a high school diploma" My point on Jim Crow was that the average man was fine with them, but the Constitution said. And again, say the average man hated racist speech and the average man pushed to pass laws to ban it. The Constitution will not allow that going against the average man.
    1
  45.  @223Drone  you want a national ban on contraceptives I see.
    1
  46.  @melgibson7313  lie about what?
    1
  47.  @223Drone  you openly defend a federal ban on contraceptives. Why?
    1
  48.  @223Drone  answer my question, why do you support a federal ban on contraceptives?
    1
  49. There is no right to contraceptive. Why does the left keep making up rights?
    1