Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

So indoctrination is what you support?
2
No investigation was done and people just dismissed the idea without question. Sad how many sheep exist in this nation.
2
@ProMace I support Trump, I am getting my PhD in physical chemistry this summer. My friend supports Trump who has a law degree. My other friend does as well and he has a PhD in physics. There are intelligent people on both sides of the aisle.
1
@223Drone how so?
1
@lemon93 one, science does not prove anything. Next, the mask was virtue signaling. It was never about the virus. Noticed how after a bad week for Biden the CDC is now reversing their stance on mask? Or how Biden signs a 100 day mask mandate and on that same day he does a photoshoot with his grandkids with no mask and no social distancing. Why? In fact, the reality that many on the left fell for covid BS as a whole, and now their heads are exploding over the new CDC guidance on masks makes me question their intelligence.
1
@lemon93 you also don't have to believe me. Only have to convince the 5 members on my committee.
1
@223Drone what conspiracy theories? Consider the left pushing the idea that Russia changed the 2016 election that a federal investigation was done. Or the idea that covid was actually dangerous to the point that we had to shut down the entire nation while BLM riots were OK.
1
@223Drone yeah, and there were a lot of irregularities in the 2020 election with the last minute changes in law without going through state congress and massive mail in voting along with no one has ever received over 70 million votes in a presidential election. Now not only were their two, but one received over 80 million? "covid isn't serious despite the overwhelming scientific evidence that says otherwise" Actually the scientific evidence showed it was not that dangerous and the covid restrictions have done a lot more harm. I can go in great detail if you want. "You also ignore the fact that it has been proven many times that the overwhelming majority of BLM protests were in fact peaceful." Doesn't matter, still a lot of violence. Most murderers out there are overwhelming peaceful during their lives, so should we let them walk? As for no evidence, I can go into great detail on covid using my scientific background along with my MBA background showing how wrong you are on that and the whole thing was a scam and a mess where someone like Fauci will be discredited in the medical community as a result.
1
@223Drone there were last minute changes such as voting laws in PA that were created without going through congress. And there were irregularities such as a large amount of mail in voters and an unusual turnout rate. I have evidence. Deaths are overstated. Here, 40% of covid deaths are nursing home patients. Prior to covid a UCSF report said that 50% of new nursing home patients die within 6 months and the average lifespan for them is a year. Thus, of those 40% who died statically most would be dead during this time frame to begin with. So here we are ruining the lives of millions of people to prevent people from dying from the virus when they would be dead in the same timeframe to begin with. People dying with covid are of high risk of death to begin with. What we are basically doing is the same as someone on a diet eating a salad but also have large amounts of cheese, ham and dressing on it while drinking soda. It does nothing. That person will not lose weight. The covid restrictions done nothing. People dying with it are at high risk of death to begin with and if covid does not do it something else will in the same timeframe. " Not to mention your claims that restrictions do more harm than good has been proven false many times already because studies have already shown that prevention measure do in fact work." What studies? How am I wrong on BLM protests? So if someone who murders on person in their life but is peaceful the rest of the time should not be thrown in prison? Fauci is going to be discredited. Many doctors disagree with him. You have not shown to understand science.. You just claimed that covid is dangerous but provide no evidence for it. If covid was that dangerous why did many leaders who pushed these covid restrictions such as Biden, Lightfoot, Newsom, deBlasio, etc. violated them? Because they know covid is not that dangerous. That is why Biden had no problem pulling down his mask can coughing in his hand and doing photoshoots without masks with his grandkids after signing a 100 day mask mandate. Things you choose to ignore.
1
@223Drone Fauci is not well respected. He has been called out many times and a petention has been signed by many doctors to fire him. It is not unusual for a so call "expert" in the medical or science field to go rogue, they are always written poorly after death. Same will happen with Fauci.
1
@223Drone remember, a virus so deadly, so dangerous, that Newsom can hang out with friends at a nice restaurant, and Biden does not have to wear a mask along with his grandkids even though he is 78 years old. Or Lightfoot can get a haircut which has no social distancing. Or it is OK to have a large gathering for a George Floyd memorial.
1
@223Drone Fauci is not well respected, that is why there is a petition signed by many doctors wanting him to be fired. The issue with Fauci is that he was such a failure as an actual doctor that he not only went into administration, he went into administration in government. In my field of science it is said that those who failed as scientists, especially in academics, become administrators. They cannot make it in the field they worked at so they have to get a paycheck somehow. And many feel that just because they are a doctor in their field, they can be an administrator in their field which is not always the case. That is why there are so many shortcomings in government and academics. Also, you hardly hear of these professionals going rogue on Fauci because unlike Fauci they are not media whores, they do actual work in the field where all Fauci does is run his mouth, change his position almost every day and makes wrong predictions.
1
@223Drone here is why my scientific mind will come to use. You say "nearly 600K covid deaths" where you are doing a huge sin in science, giving a number with zero context. When you do that that number has no meaning. So here, I will put that number into context. One, the average age of those deaths is in the 80s. Almost all who died were at high risk of death to begin with. As I told you with nursing home patient deaths, 40% of covid related deaths are nursing home patients. According to a UCSF report written before covid, 50% of new nursing home patients die within 6 months and the average lifespan is a year. So of those 40% who died with covid who are nursing home patients, chances are most would have been dead anyway during the same time frame. Next, nearly 80% of covid deaths or those who had to be placed in ventilators were obese. Again, people of high risk of death to begin with. Deaths of covid are overstated because of two reasons. One, hospitals are given money for every covid patient they received, so even if a patient had covid, but in reality is was other variables leading to their death, it was still listed as a covid death. That is corruption. Another reason for covid deaths being overstated is that we are looking so deeply for it that psychologically we overblow it and also many water down the standard of what a covid death is. Compare it to school shootings. They are actually rare. So when one happens everyone makes a big deal about it that we start to over dramatize the issue as if it is a major issue as opposed to a tragic outlier. It leads to problems like we saw after Parkland. What happened was that some people at the time tried to make school shootings appear to be a major concern that they were throwing out a stat that said there was, at the time, on average a school shooting every other day. However, in the details they were equating what happened in Parkland to a kid, at night, committing suicide on school grounds with a gun. They are not the same though. As with covid, someone in their 90s with a long list of health problems dying with covid, someone dying of gun shot and is infected with covid, and some relatively healthy person in their 20s dying with covid are not the same thing. The first one is simply them being old and at high risk, the second one is not covid related, and the last one is a tragic outlier that is rare. But people like you list them all as covid deaths and believe it. That is being anti science. Ignoring other variables involved is anti science. As for India, their recovery rate is high and their death rate is low. Cases are not a problem if people are living.
1
@223Drone so tell me, how can I, who look at a situation like covid and the multiple variables involved in it, denies science? You do when all you do is throw one number at me with zero context. Again, throwing out a number with zero context is anti science.
1
That is dangerous as that can be vague. Define "misinformation" as that can be applied to almost all politicians.
1
You can as long as there is a balance. You need both sides. At times you need the individual mindset.
1
Nothing at the federal level is determined by the majority of the people and for good reasons.
1
@A_Lefty_Gamer how so?
1
@LittleAl016 there was never a deep investigation
1
@LittleAl016 no there wasn't. That is why an audit is being done now.
1
@LittleAl016 so transparency is wrong? We should just trust what the media and powers to be say?
1
@LittleAl016 on you base your feelings on what?
1
@LittleAl016 if the election was so secure you should be open to any audit.
1
@LittleAl016 so you are just going to blindly follow one organization's report without question? Also, prior elections sure, there was no fraud. This past election was very unique with many irregularities. And the fact that after the results came so many quickly dismissed any idea of fraud, especially after 4 years of pushing the idea of Russia tampering with the 2016 election, is a huge red flag. Also, many governors who certified the votes were democrats and others simply saw how far the democrats were going to go to "win" and simply wanted to move on. Also, with that many states like GA are now using this situation as a way to pass more voting laws and they are doing so via congress. That opposed to PA doing so without congress and just having the governor do it which violated their state constitution. Also, so you feel the Brennan Center is legit but an organization like Cyber Ninjas is not? Why? And as we have seen the past year certain groups like the CDC have questionable credibility anymore.
1
@223Drone if the audit is so bogus why is the AZ senate looking to expand it?
1
@LittleAl016 there were many irregularities. That is clear. The fact that the most votes anyone has ever received in an election was around 69 million. But not only did two receive over 70 million, old dementia Joe received over 80 million? Or how laws were changed at the last minute without legislation. Or how there was a massive push for mail in ballots. This was unique. "But Trump was so uniquely bad, that more people did end up voting" How was he bad? The economy was doing great along with the nation. It took the democrats overblowing the virus to stop the nation in an effort to beat Trump as they literally had nothing on him. "And you and I both know that Republicans fare poorly whenever voter turnout is high. " Not really. Also, how was the right to vote was expanded? I told you why they certified the election. It was to protect their states in making it look like they cannot handle an election. It is also to get the ball rolling because unlike Democrats, Republicans can move on and find better ways to progress as opposed to cheating and lying . Again, if the election was so secured, why did the media and democrats push so hard to prevent any investigation? If there is nothing to hide, have it. AZ senate is looking to expand the audit now. As for the popular vote, nothing at the federal level is ever determined by the popular vote of the people. And no, Russia did not have a role in the 2016 election. An actual investigation was done there in which Trump did not try to prevent at all. He knew there was nothing to hide. Being for profit or non profit does not matter. And in hacking, many parts of the election was via machines so there is a point there. And again, the AZ senate is expanding the audit. If the audit is so poor right now why would the Senate expand it? "Just like you haven't given a single reason why I should believe Anti-Maskers and Anti-Vaxxers over actual science." Considering how I deeply explained the science to you on that issue and you simply ran away from that argument it is safe to say you just plug you ears and go "la la la" and live in a false reality.
1
@223Drone so if there is no fraud you should be open to an investigation like Trump was in the 2016 election and Russia. Are you scared that something might come up?
1
@223Drone you see, I simply want transparency. I do not care about the results. People like you seem scared something might turn up.
1
@223Drone with Russia a federal investigation as done showing nothing. So what will be wrong with an investigation with the 2020 election? I mean, what are you afraid of? I was open to an investigation of the 2016 election as one, I knew it will amount to nothing but also two, our elections should be transparent. So what are you scared of?
1
@223Drone how is the audit suppressing the vote base? I want free and fair elections, that is why I am open to any investigation of any elections. You clearly are not. As long as your side wins is all you care about. I want an investigation no matter what the result. That should be apolitical but apparently you are scared of losing.
1
@223Drone there have not been several audits as detailed as what is going on now in AZ. Again, if there is no voter fraud, what are you scared of? And why are you against free and fair elections? What voter suppression laws? And the FBI? What about a third party source? A third party source investigated the 2016 election and showed nothing. I feel the election was stolen. Again, the most votes anyone has ever received in a presidential election was Obama in 2008 which was under 70 million. You expect me to believe that Biden received over 80 million? The guy can hardly speak, how can he motivate so many to vote for him? After an audit if nothing comes up I will be fine and move on. The fact that people like you are so dismissive of any possibility of fraud is a huge red flag as well.
1
@223Drone there were not voter audits. And if the AZ audit is so bogus, why is it being extended? You are scared and you are opposed to free and fair elections. What is wrong with transparency especially after an election during weird times and many irregularities? Face it, you can't accept that your side might have cheated. Also, there was no evidence of Russian interference.
1
@223Drone to start, the fact you feel that there was Russia interference in the 2016 election even though there was a deep investigation by many parties and no evidence was found shows how much of a bias hack you are. There was no deep investigation in the 2020 election. I pointed out many irregularities and last minute changes in laws. In PA they changed voting laws without congress, that is a well known fact. The reality is that you are scared that an investigation will turn something up, and you do not support a free and fair election but instead want to win at all cost. I have said it before and I will say it again. To me it isn't' about who wins or lose as in the day I will move on with my life. To me it is about if the system is fair and transparent. That should be a 100% apolitical idea. However, you are so big on winning because your side depends so much on the government you want your side to win at all cost. That is why when Trump won in 2016 many on the left cried and started burning down private businesses. Trump supporters just go about their day. I am. If you want elections where people can cheat their way into victory such as career, corrupt politicians like Biden and Harris, then so be it. I don't. Again, you oppose free and fair elections. If you support them why are you opposed to a deep investigation on such a weird election of 2020? You clearly supported one of 2016 when times were way more normal.
1