Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

@LittleAl016 if you care about the person why not lock them in a rubber room so you can't be harmed at all?
2
@missmusnt then protect your loved ones. In the end, the only person who can protect you is you. Secondary are those around you. You can't force people to cater to your wants .
2
It is disturbing that so many are not concerned by the major push by the government to vaccinated. This went from 2 weeks to now going door to door and potentially censoring social media.
1
Ok, so that leads to the government forcing you to take something that kills off the weak for population control. Would you support that?
1
@LittleAl016 so you would support if government were to force a drug in people for population control.
1
@dragon111409 with road signs, etc., they do not radically stop society. They are a median ground. Also, they are local laws. But on road signs, what will end basically all traffic related deaths will be to ban driving. But if you do not want to go that far, limit speeds to 15 mph. Ok, but what will happen to productivity? It will go down to a great point that it is doing more harm. Thus, a median is created. As for schools, again, locally ran. Also, those vaccines have been around for decades and are not politicized or being pushed to this degree. And back to traffic laws. Even with laws, you still need to be a defensive driver. Do you just drive down the road with no care or awareness? If so, tell me where you live so I can be more aware myself if I drive there. There are still bad drivers. There are still drivers who break the law and speed. Thus, you , as a driver, need to be aware to prevent an accident.
1
@dragon111409 ok, you bring up about not getting to choose people you never met. It is the same as driving. The second I drive my car on the road I am placing others in danger that can potentially kill them. The only way to prevent that is to ban driving. So the comparison is spot on. Life is full of dangers. We try to alleviate them, but in doing that we do not cause more harm. With covid, the lockdowns caused more harm than the virus. With the vaccine, mandating vaccine leads down to a much more dangerous path. Sure, it can be "this vaccine will make the society safer". But now you set the standard of government can mandate anything be put in your arm no matter what. Compare it to gun control. Why do gun control advocates push to ban the AR 15 so much even though most gun violence is from hand guns and the mini Ruger 14 exist which is essentially the exact same gun as the AR 15? It is because the AR 15 is black and scary, and if they can ban that gun, now the legal doorways are open to ban other guns. Same as with banning the 100 round drum. Many were saying "why do you need a 100 round drum". Well, if you ban that now the legal doorways are open to ban other magazines, and we see just that. Same with this vaccine. If you make it mandatory now the legal doorways are open to make it mandatory to take other shots that could be deadly to many.
1
@dragon111409 I am not issue hopping. The point I am making is setting a standard with government and keeping it. If you allow government to mandate that they can stick a needle in my arm and inject anything, that is dangerous. Those are legal doorways I do not want to open. So stay on issue, masks. So many were like "just wear a mask, it is not a big deal". But the issue was how is government going to go? When will they start making us wear other pieces of flair? "We are talking about a 1 time vaccine mandate to litterally save lives." Yeah, just like this was supposed to last only 2 weeks. You say it is only one time, but eventually it leads to more. Also, end the end, it is one me to decide my life. Why doesn't government ban fast food? Me eating it is a danger to my life. Why doesn't the government ban football? "you wouldn't live in a house wired by a random guy who never touched a wire before. You wouldn't walk across an interstate in like California , You wouldn't use a gun with a known faulty barrel that could explode. " Yeah, my personal choice, not the governments. If I want to walk across the interstate that is my choice, no government involved. "There are precedents for these laws in america." ' And there are standards in how we create those laws and what laws can be created.
1
@dragon111409 yelling fire in a theater is actually legal so you know. Also, what you are referring to is a call to action. " There is an Argument to be made from a legal stand point that If you refuse to wear a mask or get vaccinated and you get someone sick and especially if they die it could be litigated as assault or even manslaughter " When one goes out in public they accept some level of risk. What if I am sick in general? Should I stay home? So if someone is sick as a whole and they leave their home should they be charged for manslaughter? How far do you want to go with this? " Well no one said you had to be part of society go live in the woods in a cabin or something. " Same is with you.
1
@dragon111409 covid is not that dangerous. That is the overall issue. Is there some danger? Sure. But not to the point to justify what we did. And really not to the point to set dangerous standards with government. You say it is one vaccine, but it never stops there. Just like the federal income tax, when first implemented was supposed to be temporary. It expanded to the mess we have now. Same with gun laws how a 100 round drum was ban. Who needs it? Well, it expanded to where in some places 10 round magazines are banned. Also, you can kill others by running in traffic. Or what about the psychological effects of someone hitting someone else with their car? There is that. " The unvaccinated will be horrifically crippled and or die" Chances are they won't. Be even at that that is on them. If you are vaccinated why should you care? "You can't make the choice to drive wrecklessly and murder pedestrians with you car without consequences , you can't drive drunk without consequences ," Yeah, but those laws were created with a standard and via a middle ground. Banning driving will eliminate all traffic related deaths. But banning driving causes way more damage to society. Also, again, there are still dangerous drivers out there, so you need to be a defensive driver. In the end it is on you to protect yourself. I own 4 guns for a reason. One is that if someone breaks into my apartment I know the cops will not be there in time. " If you chose not to be vaccinated you should expect to be restricted." Why stop there? How about if you choose to smoke or eat junk food you should be restricted? Why? The whole goal at the beginning was to reduce hospitalizations. Obese people have bad health. Over 70% of those placed on ventilators for covid were obese. So why not punish obese people? That is the path you are looking to go down.
1
@dragon111409 that is not the middle ground. Restricting movement is restricting freedom. Also, tampering into someone's health history is a huge overreach. Again, why stop at vaccines? Why not obese people? One of the goals at the beginning was to reduce hospitalizations. Over 70% placed on ventilators with covid were obese. Polio vaccines have been around longer. Also, we never shut down for polio. Covid is not that dangerous. I have seen the effects of someone getting injured in football. Why not ban football?
1
They care about them. The whole point was to treat people as equals. The left took it to the extreme.
1
It is a divide and conquer strategy on both sides. That is why Trump won, he attacked both sides. Trump is reforming the republican party to actually serve the people. On the democrat side they have their person in Tulsi Gabbard, but the democrats have gone way too extreme.
1
@faerefolke yeah, instead democrats are wanting to force things in your body. How is that any different?
1
@mithramusic5909 what was wrong with the Trump's tax cuts? The economy was booming under Trump. Now, under Biden, we are seeing high inflation. And what is wrong with skepticism of science? That is science. If you worked in science you would know so much is not known.
1
@mithramusic5909 the tax cuts improved the economy and thus, the lives of Americans. And you say "studies", what studies? And I agree that misinformation on science is a problem. Read the BMJ response to the editor entitled "Covid-19: Science, Conflicts and the Elephant in the Room" They say "Hijacking of science by vested interests has resulted in immeasurable harms to society. Lockdowns, meant to save lives but being pushed by narratives that have little basis in science, have themselves caused loss of life, livelihoods, dignity, and humanity. We need to ask how we have got to this sorry state." You say "I shouldn't have to explain this". Well, I am a scientist myself, thus I know science very well. I know it is complex. This entire time science was politicized to be used as weapon
1
@mithramusic5909 as far as both sides not being the same, there is some truth there. However, in the end, there is a push to divide us. I feel it exists mainly on the left. But the right plays along as well to a degree. Think about the recent covid lockdowns. While millions were suffering many lockdown supporters like Pelosi was bragging about her ice cream collection. They were locking us down and rubbing it in our face.
1
@mithramusic5909 the economy was doing well for the majority. That is why so many elites saw Trump as a threat. So many were no longer relying on the elites to live. What misinformation on Trump? There has been a lot of misinformation on the left about the virus causing more harm than the virus would have. I can go into details if you want. But you stay home while Pelosi enjoyed her ice cream. Yes, the division is mainly from the left. Want me to go into details? I can
1
@mithramusic5909 it was doing well for the majority. Right now, under Biden, inflation is going up. Under Trump unemployment was low, worker participation rate was high and inflation was low. But hey, Trump is gone and inflation went up again last month.
1