Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

  1.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  oil companies have not drilled because there are so many expensive restrictions placed on them if they do. You can thank Biden for that.
    2
  2. Could not find any story reporting this.
    2
  3.  @kurisu7885  here, I can do the same thing. A verified source told me Mike cheated in grad school which is why he really got kicked out. Text messages confirmed that he also sold drugs to kids. Along with that, Mike did ads against abortion. Do I have to present any of that? According to Mike and his fans, including you, I don't. Just have to take my word for it.
    2
  4. This story has been debunked. Is Mike going to give an apology?
    2
  5. Looked it up, I so little evidence of this even being true. And when did she attack minorities?
    1
  6. Googled this story, can't find it anywhere.
    1
  7.  @223Drone  well, traffic accidents do and you support that.
    1
  8. For what? For lying? This story has been debunked. The people creating this lie have zero pieces of evidence.
    1
  9. not true. To start, define what a "red state" is. Next, CA has the highest poverty rate when you factor in cost of living. Use of porn? Where does the porn industry lie? What level of violence? And racism? Democrats are some of the most racist people out there.
    1
  10.  @223Drone  ok, and I googled it and found nothing else. It it was true there would clearly be other sources. Also, you are the one to talk about sources as you never give any.
    1
  11.  @kurisu7885  I am not finding sources. Besides, look at his video. They say there is an ad, so where is it? They say there are texts, ok, where are they? They say a client connected to the Koch brothers was involved, ok, who? And they claimed someone said she got an abortion. Ok, who? They said it was a "verified source", again, who?
    1
  12.  @223Drone  here, I have a verified source that you kidnap little kids. I have text messages showing you drug them. And you also posted ads more NAMBLA. See how easy it is to make claims without evidence? You should, you do it all the time.
    1
  13.  @223Drone  so why did you kidnap kids and advertise them on NAMBLA? I have sources saying you did.
    1
  14.  @223Drone  ok child kidnapper. Again, I have verifiable sources showing you kidnap children, drug them and advertise them to NAMBLA.
    1
  15.  @223Drone  I watched the video. I gave quotes from it. Sorry, but a group saying they have an ad, but never shows it, they have texts, but never shows them, saying they have a verifiable source but never states who it, etc. is not evidence to me. But what is evidence to me are the verifiable sources I have stating you kidnap children, drug them and advertise them to NAMBLA.
    1
  16.  @223Drone  uh, child kidnapper, Mike cites the article entitled "Fire Boebert". And again, child kidnapper, I did google it. Outside of some youtube videos I see no articles. Especially no articles on major news sources where if this story was true they will appear.
    1
  17.  @kurisu7885  ok, what articles? And are they of major news source? Please give.
    1
  18.  @223Drone  so you just disappear? I guess of one of the kids you tried to kidnap ran away.
    1
  19.  @melgibson7313  no, more of you guys hate a certain politician so much that you will believe anything negative about them. You say I am told what to think but here you are believing a story from a very bias source that 1. Claimed there is an ad but does not show it 2. claims there are texts but does not show them 3. claims there was a client she saw that was connected to the Koch brothers but does not say who 4. Claimed to have a verifiable source but does not say who Anyone can make claims, now where is the evidence. I am the one questioning things, you are the one blindly believing a story with zero evidence.
    1
  20.  @melgibson7313  here, I have a verifiable source that you planned 9/11. I have text messages stating that. So by your logic it must be true.
    1
  21.  @223Drone  it is not a logical fallacy. I am making a claim about you. I saw the sources Mike provided. It is very simple 1. Where is the 2. Where are texts 3. who was the client 4. Who is the verifiable source. How is a child kidnapper, that I found out about you via text messaging and a verifiable source, like you find it so difficult to understand?
    1
  22.  @melgibson7313  I bet if this bias organization were to tell you that Boebert started the Chicago fire you will blindly believe it as well. So tell me, when I am the one asking questions on where is the ad? Where are the texts, etc.? How is it that I am not thinking for myself? Where is this so call evidence? Where are the facts? Please tell me. You claim I am gullible but here you are believing a story with zero evidence. When the evidence comes our, if it exists, then I will believe it. Until, I can't buy into a story with no evidence. Apparently you can.
    1
  23.  @223Drone  again, what evidence? Where are the ads? Where are the texts? Just like I can claim you are a child kidnapper and claim I have verifiable sources, that is what is in this video. The organization made claims but provided no evidence. I watched the video. They claimed there is a sugerdaddy ad, ok, where? They claimed there were texts, ok, where? They claimed she met up with a client who is connected to the Koch Brothers. OK, who? There is a reason why no major news organization is reporting this. There is no evidence and reporting it can lead to a major lawsuit.
    1
  24.  @223Drone  so please, tell me, where is the evidence? Where is the ad? Where are the texts, etc. Until you provide that you have absolutely nothing. And don't say "watch the video", I did and none of those pieces of evidence were provided. Or maybe they were and I overlooked it. So in that case, just tell me where they are at? Should be a simple task. Until you do you have nothing.
    1
  25.  @melgibson7313  where is the proof?
    1
  26.  @223Drone  so as usual you have nothing
    1
  27.  @223Drone  I watched the video. Again, where is the ad? Where are the text? Where is the verifiable source and client? Just saying they exist does not make it true. I bet you believe in big foot because some people say they saw it without giving tangible evidence to see. So how am I ignorant?
    1
  28.  @223Drone  I am going to report you to the cops because a verifiable source told me you kidnapped dies, and text show you give them drugs. And there are ads to NAMBLA of them you created. Enjoy prison with the such strong evidence I have on you.
    1
  29.  @223Drone  BTW, I googled it again, Boebert is looking to sue that organization now. In Newsweek "In response to Newsweek's request for comment, a spokesperson for Boebert called the accusations against her "totally false" and said the congresswoman "is consulting her attorneys on next steps."" Should be interesting. I watched the video, I read the article.
    1
  30.  @223Drone  hmmm, for some reason the comment where I quoted the article got deleted. I guess I will try again ".....Lauren Boebert was an unlicensed, paid escort and met clients through SugarDaddy....." That site would be her advertising. "Text messages show she was bankrupt and the time......." What text messages? ".......A wealthy male client in Aspen, Colorado......." Ok, who? I did read the article.
    1
  31.  @223Drone  btw, I wrote two comments quoting the article. One got deleted. I will see if the second one does. But Boebert is suing that group. If the accusations against her are true why would she press charges?
    1
  32.  @223Drone  I did watch the video. I read the same article he cited and even quoted it. So now answer my questions. Where is the ad? Where are the texts? Who is the client? Who is the verifiable source?
    1
  33.  @223Drone  "Again Mike didn't cite an ad" You are dense. i am talking about the authors of the article Mike cited. Mike cited an article. In the article the group stated she was on sugar daddies, meaning she posted an ad. So where is this ad this group claims to exist?
    1
  34.  @223Drone  on larger news networks there is an article of her pressing charges. And they show up a day after the fact. When this story so call "broke" no major news network reported it making googling it hard at that time.
    1
  35.  @223Drone  I literally quoted the article.
    1
  36.  @223Drone  I did. We will see how the legal system plays out. She is looking to press charges.
    1
  37.  @223Drone  I expect you will be hiding when all of this is shown to be false.
    1
  38.  @223Drone  a WashingtonPost article, while ripping on Lauren, debunked this article. This video, as predicted, did not age well.
    1
  39. I googled this, I don't find this story anywhere.
    1
  40.  Sean Arel  I googled again, only found youtube videos with many saying "allegedly". Learn how to research.
    1
  41.  @223Drone  I did do research. Plenty of videos saying allegedly, zero news articles on it. Now prove me wrong. Of course you won't.
    1
  42.  Sean Arel  the middle class was doing great under Trump. Now under Biden we have record inflation and people are suffering.
    1
  43.  @223Drone  Mike's "source" was from a very bias institution looking for something and providing no evidence for their claim. Again, if this happened why are there no articles in it? I will wait. If I am factually wrong you should be able to find some liberal news sources giving articles on this claim. As usual, with you, I will wait.
    1
  44.  @223Drone  the article Mike cited is called "Fire Boebert". If you can't see it being bias then I can't help you. But please, prove me wrong. As usual you will provide zero sources.
    1
  45.  @223Drone  I watched the video. Where is the evidence? Where is her ad on Sugardaddy? Who was the wealthy client that hired her? Where are the text messages? I mean, if they exist they should be easy to release. Who is the verify source? None of that is released. Funny part is I don't even like Boebert, I just hate the lies from the far left they continue to push. You know, like Jan. 6th, claims on Rittenhouse, etc.
    1
  46.  @223Drone  I watched the video, here 1. The "source' claim there was a sugerdaddy ad but provided on such ad for evidence 2. They claimed there were text but provided no such sources 3. They claimed there was a client connected to the Koch brothers, but provided no name of that client 4. They claimed a "verified source" provided evidence of her getting an abortion, but did not provide who the source was The sources Mike provided are null. Anyone can claim to have an ad, texts, verify sources, etc. while provided none of it.
    1
  47.  @223Drone  here, I have a verify source that Mike cheated in graduated school. Texts I received prove that which is why he dropped out. Mike also sold drugs and advertised on the dark web. All sources I have to go against Mike. By your standard that I all I need. No need to release them, just need to say I have them.
    1
  48.  @223Drone  I did watch it. Where is the ad? Who was the verifiable source? Where are the texts? Who was the client connected to the Koch brothers?
    1
  49.  @223Drone  hey, I heard about you. I have a verifiable source that you kidnap kids. I seen ads of you advertising them to NAMBLA. I have have seen texts of you making deals with drug dealers to drug kids. No need to give any of them, just have to take my word for it just like we have to take the word of Muckrakers PAC. You know, them claiming to have all this evidence but do not show any of it.
    1
  50.  @223Drone  ok kidnapper. Again, I have verifiable sources stating you kidnap kids, drug them and advertise them to NAMBLA. Texts and everything.
    1
  51.  @margotpreston  what?
    1