General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

whyamimrpink78
The Humanist Report
comments

Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "" video.

I pick Rittenhouse being not guilty.
4
@regulatedfreestylevideos basically everyone.
3
@MisterInevitable what he did was self defense. He went there to help protect businesses as he has family there and works there. So he had every right to be there. What was great was that the evidence showed it was self defense, and one is innocent until proven guilty which the prosecutor could not prove guilt. It gave hope in the justice system. You should be happy as well.
3
@LittleAl016 an innocent individual walking free shows the court system has some hope.
2
@antihero917 not saying you are defending Rosenbaum. What I am saying is that Kyle was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Why? All Rosenbaum had to do was not chase after Kyle. Also, what business did Rosenbaum and other rioters had being there? Also, as I said with the cops, if they are not going to do their job the citizens will.
2
Yep, I pick Rittenhouse being found not guilty as one of the best moments in 2021. It shows there is still hope on the court system.
2
@LittleAl016 why? What laws did he break?
1
@antihero917 I don't agree with him drawing attention to himself. But you say wrong place wrong time? What about the people who attacked him? What business did they have being there? It goes both ways bud.
1
@antihero917 1. OK 2. What? 3. Define an "assault rifle". And a reason why Rittenhouse acted like he did was because the cops were doing nothing. In the end cops are paid for by the local community. If they do nothing the local community will. Just like if someone breaks into my apartment I can defend myself as opposed to waiting for cops. Also, people like Rosenbaum really had no business being there as well. It goes both ways. And running through the streets with a gun is not illegal. How about don't be stupid and chase him down.
1
@antihero917 Rosenbaum died doing what he loves best, chasing down a minor to get his hands on him. If Rosenbaum did not go after Kyle he would still be alive. It is that simple.
1
@antihero917 If Rosenbaum and Grosskruetz did not show up they would still be alive as well. Or if they did not attack Kyle they will still be alive. The situation could have been avoided if there were no rioters like Rosenbaum and Grosskruetz. You are giving them a pass for some reason but is also blaming Kyle. If the cops are not going to act out then citizens will. In the end all cops are are citizens that are hired by the local community to protect and serve. If they don't then citizens will. In that case the cops were allowing the riots to go on thus private citizens pushed back. I also never said Kyle was a hero. But the idea he was in the wrong place at the wrong time but Rosenbaum and Grosskruetz weren't, or that Kyle was running through the streets when the reason was because he was being chased is showing a double standard. If the rioters were not there Kyle would not be there.
1
@antihero917 I am celebrating his acquittal because it was correct. Despite the politicization of it, the media and many politicians labeling him as a racist he was found not guilty. To me it showed how asinine the left is in jumping to conclusions as opposed to waiting for all the evidence to come out. They immediately labeled him as a racist, including Biden. But after all the evidence came out it was clear he was not. What the Rittenhouse verdict showed was how the left just jumps to conclusion and keeps dividing our nation. But with the courts our nation still has a chances to be strong.
1
@lordandmaster14 how do I support murdering people?
1
@antihero917 what white power hand signs? You are really reaching here. You mean the same "OK' symbol Biden flashed at one point, or many others have flashed at one point?
1
@antihero917 this is why so many are sick of the left. When you push them people on the left cry "racism" on issues that are not race related.
1
@antihero917 what nazi salutes? I have seen the videos. I see it more of him mocking the left for making everything about race and racism these days. I find Derek Chauvin's conviction questionable as it was political. His situation was not as clear as Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse was clearly innocent. Chauvin's situation was not as clear. However, the constant riots, and Maxine Waters, from CA, being in CA after curfew telling people to get more confrontational if they did not get verdict they wanted makes his situation more complex. Waters had no business being there. She is from CA. If riots were to occur in MN she would be safe in her gated community in CA.
1
@antihero917 you calling me a racist shows you know nothing about me. I was called a racist before and the person who said it to me I put them in their place as there are times I am in a situation where I am the minority as a white person. As there are more black individuals in a given area where I am at. Even now where I just moved to, there are many black individuals. I was at a bar the other day, only white guy at the bar. How did I act? Normal. I just talked to them normally. You making something about race on a non race issue makes you the racist.
1
@antihero917 it is not a racist hand signal. The left has gone insane where everything is racist to them. Why? Because they are racist. Also, when Rittenhouse was found not guilty how did black people act where I live at? They went on with life. Rittenhouse is not a racist, you are.
1
@antihero917 the left voted in Biden, a literal racist.
1
@antihero917 I told you about the Chauvin verdict. My issue with that is how the mob seem to influence the decision. As in if he was found not guilty the mob was going to riot even more. That is not how the system should work. Add in the fact that Maxine Waters acted the way she did made it worse.
1
@LittleAl016 then how did he receive over 80 million votes, supposedly?
1
@antihero917 also, with heroes. The left is making statues of George Floyd, a drug addict felon. Really? That as low as you guys can go?
1
@LittleAl016 and Trump received 74 million votes how?
1
@LittleAl016 so you admit there was voter fraud?
1
@antihero917 the Chauvin situation was more complex. There is question on what he did was actually illegal. Was the knee on the neck proper police protocol or not? If so then we can debate if it should be. Next, there is evidence Floyd was high and in bad health were any stressful situation would lead to his death. And even if Chauvin was guilty, where is the evidence it was race base? There were 3 other black individuals with Floyd, none were harm. So there is that. I suggest you look up Tony Timpa, a white individual who died in a similar way.
1
@LittleAl016 so you are admitting voting fraud exists. Thus, if I were to say the democrats stole the election you can't simply say there is no voting fraud.
1
@LittleAl016 but you are also the same person who said Trump is a fascist, but when I pushed you to explain how you ran away.
1
@antihero917 a racist person like you make everything to be about race. Again, on Chauvin, even if he was guilty in killing Floyd does not mean it was an act of racism.
1
That is all Sam has going for him. Look at his view count, very low. People refuse to debate him because all he does is talk down to people.
1
@maxsmart9116 well, people stopped responding as I was owning them. Just like I own people here. I see leftists have a hard time being challenged and just stick their head in the sand.
1
@maxsmart9116 how can you take Sam serious when he admitted he did not watch the Rittenhouse trial but proceeds to have a strong opinion about it?
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos that is how it works. I come here with well laid out arguments and people just resort to name calling or moving goal posts. I was in a long discussion with someone over a few days about immigration and kids getting natural born citizenship. They drifted the conversation from illegal immigration to immigration as a whole as if I oppose any form of immigration. They were moving the goal posts but I silenced them when I said I support immigration but feel we need to have standards. The person I was debating was pushing the narrative that I opposed all forms of immigration which I don't. Point being, people here can't take me on.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos well, you are bias. I own people all the time here. In fact, you and I can have a discussion on a topic if you want. If I know a good amount about it we can proceed. If I don't I am willing to admit ignorance. For example, topics related to foreign nations I typically know little about and admit it and don't get involved. But other topics I feel confident on. So if you want you and I can have a discussion.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos the reason is because all I hear from "progressives" are how popular their ideas are. But yet, channels that push such ideas have low views. It goes to show people do not want to listen to someone like Sam. And Sam doing what he did to Crowder was Sam trying to punch up and get clicks. Afterwards Sam talked about it for weeks where Crowder moved on. Why? Because Sam has no content, he has poor ideas, he is boring to listen to, and thus get no views.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos Sam and other leftists talking down to people does not get many views. It is why so many are annoyed with leftists. They feel they are better than others with a smug attitude. However, when Sam admits to not watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial and then proceeds to have an opinion about it shows how terrible he is all around.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos "with the countless studies of American peoples favorable opinions on medicare for all, paid maternity leave, raising the minimum wage, breaking up big banks, a wealth tax on the super rich, slashing prescription drug prices, etc" One, what studies? Please provide them. As I have seen many times, many people will say "studies say this" but provide nothing. Next, what you are presenting is very vague. On the surface someone may support those ideas, but when you go into details many oppose. That is why when universal healthcare in CO was on the ballot more information was given and the voters voted against it. I assume you might be citing polls, but the problem with polls is that they are vague question on complex issues being asked to people who are not experts. For example, you may poll people if they support raising the min. wage. Ok, maybe on the surface the majority do. But when you start giving a value such as should it be $10/hr, $15/hr, $20/hr, support begins to drop the higher it gets. To add, say a poll supports people raising the min. wage with inflation. This is where people not being experts come in. What method of inflation? CPI, PCE, GDP deflator, Boskin Commission adjusted CPI? And what about the flaws of inflation such as new technology bias or replacement bias? For example, take cars. Cars, on pure sticker price are more expensive compared to many cars in the 60s and 70s. However, cars today last longer, get better gas mileage, are safe all which saves money in the long run. Or consider how we have smart phones that have more computing power than want put a man on the moon and the access to many resources that saves money such as coupons, or online purchasing. This is why "progressive" ideas fall apart. They are grossly oversimplified solutions to complex issues. And when progressives start to push them they fall apart when challenged.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos "are you arguing that the studies are wrong?" If such "studies" exist then I say one of two things. One, they are wrong or two, they don't say what you think they say.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos "so you don’t believe Americans are majority supportive of all the things I listed ?" I am saying it is more complex than what you make it out to be. You say "raising the minimum wage". Ok, to what? How much? How? And the people supporting the idea how much do they understand about the min. wage and economics? Again, you are asking vague questions on complex issues to non experts. When you start going into more details people change their minds. Take medicare for all. If you ask people everyone should have access to healthcare many will say yes. Now if you ask if the federal government should overtake our healthcare system overhauling a system that is nearly 20% of our economy when the federal government has shown to fail in many ways, many will say no. But both questions are essentially the same.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos "if you need a dumb flashy anecdote instead of actual data just go watch Bernie sanders Fox News town hall" You mean the one where he said that anyone can write a best selling book? " it’s okay to say you just don’t know. go do some research we can resume later" Usual response I get here. You said studies existed. I gave you an example in CO when the voters there voted against universal healthcare in that state. When put up to a vote the people said no. Also, you said studies exist, so you should have no problem providing them. You can't. Why?
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos where are these studies? At this point the onus is on you to present them. Where should I look up? Fox News? The Daily Wire? This is a problem I have with people here. Someone like you will say "studies" but then present none. If so many studies exist you should be able to provide some. Telling me to do my own research means I can look at anything. It is no different then when Sam Seder, in a debate with Charlie Kirk, told people to "google it" when it came to wages and inflation. Ok, google what? What method of inflation? There are many. What sector when it comes to wages? There are many. \ "the remark about people’s opinions being null if they don’t have a deep economics knowledge is bad" Not saying it is null, saying you should be skeptical. Should we going down the route of uninformed people want? "are you under the impression everyone viewing YouTube has an economics degree? are those stats more believable than polling data?" Nope. And on polling data, I told you why they are unreliable. They are vague questions on complex issues being asked no non experts. And how you phrase the question matters. As I told you, if you were to ask people if everyone deserves access to healthcare in the US many, including me, will say yes. Now if you expand that and ask if the federal government should overtake our healthcare system, which is 20% of our economy, taking away people's insurance, raising taxes, etc., the support will drop. Same with the min. wage. If you ask people it should be raised many will say yes. Now if you say it should be raised to $20/hr many will say no as they will say that is too high. You say progressive policies are popular when little exists to suggest that.
1
@lordandmaster14 I never called Sam.
1
@lordandmaster14 when did I call him?
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos so not actual studies then, just polls. We need to make that clear. You said studies, now you are citing polls from news sources. I told you the flaws in polls. Vague questions on complex issues being asked to non experts. I stand behind my measure. Sam has low views people people don't support him. That is the reality. But if you want to ignore youtube views and talk policies we can. I just explained to you how polling data is highly unreliable. Again, vague question on complex issues being asked to non experts. And how you phrase the question matters. As I said with the min. wage. If you just ask should it be raised many will say yes. But if you ask should it be raised to $20/hr, many will say no. When you start adding details people's positions change. As with Medicare for all. In CO, a left leaning state, they voted against universal healthcare when placed on the ballot as people learned more about it.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos as I said, polling data is highly unreliable. Vague questions on complex issues asked to non experts. If progressive policies are so popular why don't you see more of them being passed at the local level?
1
@lordandmaster14 2019 what?
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos peered review papers and books that many universities accept written by experts.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos directly, no. What they do say is that these issues are complex. Polling data is unreliable as, again, they are vague questions on complex issues being asked to non experts. There is a reason why experts in those fields keep publishing papers and books on those topics. You coming to a conclusion based on a simple poll that experts dedicate their life to researching shows the disconnect on your end. You are saying instead of analyzing all the research done by the experts we should just go off of polling data of vague questions being answered by non experts. That is a dangerous standard.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos ok, what studies? You are shifting from polls to studies but are not referencing any studies.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos on policies that are placed on ballots, at times there is a lot of information presented before voting time. Also, another flaw of polls is how much people actually value such policy. For example, someone may support a min. wage increase, or medicare for all. But how much they value that may be low. They may value something like lower taxes, or a particular candidate more. So there is that. For example, with me. I strongly support no minimum wage. However, I support state rights to develop a min. wage even more. So if I were to decide on a vote of A: Do you support a federal mandate to end all min. wage or B: Do you support allowing states to decide to establish a min. wage I will pick B 100%. Why? Because I support state rights over federal control. It is the same with other people. One may support medicare for all or an increase in the min. wage. But on the list of issues that may be near the bottom of their list overall.
1
@regulatedfreestylevideos " better yet how are you currently assesing the popularity of policies?" The fact that in many local elections many of those policies are not being passed.
1
@MisterInevitable who are these people?
1
@MisterInevitable not saying it does not happen. You saying I have to do my own research is disheartening because you are making the claim, you should have the evidence. To me the Rittenhouse situation, for how political it was and he was found not guilty is a good sign. Compare that to the Chauvin situation that was also very political and the entire book was thrown at him despite the doubt that existed.
1
@MisterInevitable I will have to look into farther before I make a conclusion.
1
How was he terrified? People refuse to debate Sam as all he does is talk down to people. He has this smug "I am better than you" attitude in his debates and afterwards all he does is mock the person he debated. No respect.
1
1. Sam Seder is someone people do not want to debate because he is disrespectful and talks down on people. Plus, with his "uh, um" it takes forever to get something out of him. 2. Cori Bush protesting was a joke overall with her using many corporate goods at that time 3. On Derek Chauvin there are questions on how much the jury was scared of more riots happening and their lives being threatened. Maxine Waters telling people to get more confrontational was insane 4. What did "striketober" do? Nothing. 5. So Mike is OK with the bathroom protesters but when people on the right protest other members of congress that is wrong? 6. Eh, I agree with the Alex Jones situation, he was wrong in what he said about Sandy Hook
1