Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Fight for $15" video.
-
1
-
1
-
XellosTheDragon No, what Sharon was saying is that everything should go up in price, including labor because "inflation". Some goods have dropped in price and the same is with labor. Some goods have remained the same in price and some have gone up like in labor.
Before the tractor we had people working on the farms. The tractor came and those working on the farms ended up getting a value of $0. With Netflix and Red Box we have seen Blockbuster employees go to a value of $0. In my hometown there was a battery plant and in the 90s it employed over 800 people. So many appliances used batteries as in walkmens, RC cars, cordless phones and so on. Now with Ipads, cell phones, laptops and so one having batteries on boards that recharge, the demand for batteries dropped. That company started to close down factories and when it closed down the one in my town it only employed around 200 people. That means the value of those workers is no $0.
To think that the value of the person running the cash register or flipping burgers at a restaurant has gone up is ludicrous. It hasn't. If you look at technology and the trend in the economy inflation should not be happening and if it is it shouldn't be happening much at all. The reason why food is expensive at the grocery store is because of a policy such as the min. wage. The min. wage went up, a low wage employer such as the grocery store need to pay the employees more now by law, thus they increased prices.
We are producing more food than ever due to technology, we even throw away food. The price of food should be dropping. But the min. wage, which is outpacing productivity, is causing them to go up.
And to think that a min. wage was needed so you can't starve is not true. You are mandating how much is being paid per hour, but not per week.
Your grasp of economics has dropped to a new low.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mike Stavenes I am in my upper 20s. I have worked a min. wage job for years and it wasn't hard work. You have little responsibilities, it requires little skills, the hours are flexible, and overall the work is easy. So yes, those on min. wage don't work hard.
"Maybe if they did that same job with more efficiency, that the boss
would reward them by paying them more, out of the kindness of his heart?"
The boss does out of an investment to keep their more productive employees from going to another job.
"How hard people work has nothing to do with how much money they make"
Yes it does, along with skill set and demand.
"If they want to keep more of the money they make from the labors of
their employees...they pay them less, and demand more...which is exactly
what you see happening in the US economy."
Except less than 5% of workers earn at or below the min. wage, around 50% of workers earning a min. wage get a raise within a year, and the average hourly earnings in the US is around $24/hr.
"And you really have to stop using the bullshit about a lack of goods"
Goods are limited. Where are the goods going to come from?
Your idea of money is flawed. If the money isn't there then the price of goods will drop. A company just holding onto goods gives them nothing. In smaller more local areas goods are cheaper for a reason.
The US moved factories overseas for 2 reasons, expensive regulations and overall the evolution of the economy. Saying the economy is consumer based if flawed, you can't consume what you don't produce. If people had the more money but the amount of goods are the same guess what happens? Prices go up.
Businesses simply can't afford higher wages. If Walmart and McDonalds CEOs were to take in $0 and pass it on to the workers their employees would earn an extra $0.001 per hour. The money simply isn't there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1