Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "NRA Sues To Block Mild Gun Reform In Florida" video.

  1. StormCrown, there is a lack of cops along with lack of funds. Teachers being armed accounts for that. Same as how I own a gun so I don't have to depend on cops if a criminal breaks into my home.
    3
  2. jBowser 09, you wish ill will on others to push your point. You just gave an example of what he means.
    3
  3. I know the entire amendment and know that it solidifies the right for the people to bear arms
    2
  4. Desphinx, we amended the Constitution to allow women to be equal. As for guns, they were very dangerous then, and there were "assault weapons" during that time. It wasn't just for muskets. Steven Crowder has a video on that. Also, why don't you apply that for the first amendment? Internet did not exist in those days, should we remove that amendment?
    2
  5. StormCrown, people with CCW are taught when the cops show up you drop the gun and go hands up. Your scenario won't happen.
    2
  6. "the 2nd Amendment was indeed for a "well regulated militia" and not for individual gun rights." Ok, so why is this there " the right of the people" So people are not individuals? If so than by your standards "the people" do not have freedom of speech either as it is worded like that in the 1st amendment. The fact is "well regulated" meant well prepared. " Also, the Amendment was never intended to protect the citizens from the government" Again,not true at all and you can see that based on the writings of the founding fathers.
    2
  7. Bradley Smith, the founding fathers just fought a war against a tyrannical government. In establishing a government the saw the need to allow citizens to be armed, thus they created that right and made it number 2 for a reason, it was that important. The 2nd amendment was about preventing tyranny. Your argument on "slave patrols" is weak as many colonies did not have slaves.
    2
  8. Define "senseable"
    2
  9. jBowser 09, I am 30, I understand life pretty well. You made this comment "all big talk till this happens to your child," That is wishing ill will on someone in hopes that they will support your ideas. Also "then again you would be in favor of arming teachers." Is not an argument. So what if they support that? You do know that is already being done in schools in Texas and Ohio. What problems have happened so far?
    2
  10. Desphinx, the DC vs Heller case showed the debate with the 5-4 ruling. There is, at the very least, a debate. I can easily debate Kyle on this issue and show how incredibly ignorant he is on it. This is why Kyle lives in a bubble and never has guests on his shows or debates people, doing so will show how much of a fraud he is.
    2
  11. CutThroatJuggalo, so should unions and planned parenthood be allowed to fund politicians as well?
    1
  12. Desphinx, not true. There are methods to change it and when you look at the rights they were to restrict government. Also, it spread out the powers to limit government. It is not outdated at all.
    1
  13. Desphinx, too add on guns, the 2ns amendment was to prevent tyranny which again, is not an outdated concept.
    1
  14. Bradley Smith, there was the Belton Flintlock and the Girandoni air rifle. The first could shoot 8 bullets in a short amount of time and the second can hold 20 balls and thus require no reloading. I saw you on other comments. You need to learn more about the history of your guns. Even at that, the argument of how guns improved is poor for two reasons. One, you are saying the founding fathers never expected technology to get better when they were very intelligent people. Two, you can apply that idea to the 1st amendment and the internet. Either way, there were guns that shot more than 3 rounds in a short amount of time.
    1
  15. Desphinx, the idea was to limit government which is never outdated.
    1
  16. Luminita Baboianu, they can if needed. What makes you think they can't?
    1
  17. Luminita Baboianu, also, if the federal army were to attack citizens without the governor's consent that is literally attacking that state and thus a civil war is created dividing our army. Learn how our country is designed.
    1
  18. Brock Lindseth, your anecdotal experience is not the norm. I own 4 guns and I know many gun owners and we are fine. So my anecdotal experience counters yours. As for a knee jerk reaction I see the practice of parading kids after they experience a horrific event as being knee jerk.
    1
  19. Brock Lindseth, your Georgia situation was of an illegal gun owner, the gun law did not stop them from bringing it on campus. Thanks for bringing that up to show that gun law did not work except keep guns out of law abiding citizen's hands.
    1
  20. Heavy Metal Collector, you clearly never had CCW training
    1
  21. Bradley Smith 1. Yes, we never had a mass shooting at a school with armed teachers, hmmm..... 2. Yes, there will be no misunderstanding. Cops just don't go into a place shooting. They have to have a clear shot first, if they decide to do that. Most of the time they want to take the person and arrest them. That is why Cruz was arrested and not shot, that is why Holmes was arrested and not shot. Also, those with CCWs know to drop the gun once the cops show up. Teachers know the layout of the school and will be in a position of cover if needed. They are not going to be going around shooting up the place either. 3. Once the cops show up the threat will be taken care by them. And again, teachers will be in a position of cover. 4. No they won't. They will be in a position of cover and no longer have the gun. Again, you need to understand how these situations are handled by police. Why wasn't Cruz shot by the police? By your thought process he should have been.
    1
  22. Brock Lindseth, teachers pay for their own guns and training like I do.
    1
  23. Just a Lurker, as for states with no ccw laws, every agrees to require training to carry a gun on campus.
    1
  24. TylerTheGamer, people with CCW are trained as well and know not to shoot unless they have a clean shot. A similar situation happened in San Bernardino
    1
  25. Just a Lurker, teachers won't be in the open just shooting the place up. They will be hiding around the corner and looking for a clear shot. Also, they will know when the cops come.
    1
  26. Bradley Smith, cops just don't come and shoot a place up. They take cover as well and try to get the person to surrender. You have no idea how cops are trained.
    1
  27. Bradley Smith, we have armed citizens all across the US but yet the situation you are describing does not happen. There is no chaos. When the cops show up the teachers will drop their guns. Also, we already have many schools with armed teachers in them. Learn some facts please.
    1
  28. Just a Lurker, as for the AZ video, that is one incident out of how many? Nothing is ideal, I want to give law abiding citizens a chance.
    1
  29. Brock Lindseth, on that teacher what you see is once again a gun law kept guns out of law abiding citizen's hands. The point of allowing teachers to carry guns is that they obey the law and can protect themselves and students.
    1
  30. Vulcano, again, you ban one gun you open the avenue to ban others. Where does it stop?
    1
  31. Vulcano, there are many guns just as deadly as the AR 15. If that gun is banned and another mass shooting happens what is your next step? What gun do you ban next? That is the point. You open that avenue in banning one gun others will follow.
    1
  32. Vulcano, many weapons are similar to the AR 15, as in almost all of them.
    1
  33. Taknom Wolfan, there are many guns who have 30 round magazines.
    1
  34. Vulcano, banning the AR 15 is a step towards a gun ban. Over 80% of mass shootings did not involve that gun. Also, there are many guns just as dangerous like the Ruger mini 14, exact same gun pretty much.
    1
  35. jBowser 09, to add, we do not govern on polls. Doing so will lead to very dangerous results. If 97% of the country supported slavery would you push for it? If 97% supported isolation with no immigration would you support it? Even at that, take the 66% of the poll I just pointed out. If 66% supported banning free speech would you push for it? We cannot govern on polls, especially ones that are vague.
    1
  36. " And I stand by my comment 97% of people wished we had more stronger rules" What do you base that on? Looking it up I can imagine it is from Quinnipiac poll that said 97% supported background checks. However, that same source said "American voters support stricter gun laws 66 - 31 percent" Not 97%. And that is after a mass shooting, do it months afterwards. So only 66% support stricter gun laws. As for that background checks and 97%, it said "universal" which is vague. One, we already have it. Two, you cannot regulate private sales that strongly unless you create a gun registry. " And it's called putting ones self in another shoes" So unless I experience a horrific event I cannot have an opinion? Does a doctor need to suffer through cancer before they can give medical treatment to someone with cancer? I agree there is an emotional side to an argument, but there are facts and reasoning as well. I feel bad for those who have died and their family members. And I have ideas to alleviate this from happening. However, we cannot ignore the facts when it comes to guns. You are with your appeal to emotion statements and your deceptive presentation of polling data which was done after a mass shooting which skews the results. "We all need to sit a the table and come up with simple rules that make mass murder by guns less." I agree, that means you need to understand the entire issue and not give out meaningless numbers. " Arming teachers is a problem when most are stressed with class sizes and poor level of pay etc.."' Many teachers are armed in many districts in TX and Ohio. Also, it isn't about arming all teachers. There will be rules. My idea is that 1. The teacher is experienced in teaching and has worked in the field for years 2. They take proper training 3. It is voluntary Teachers that are armed in Ohio have the gun locked away in safe that requires fingerprints to open. The safe is hidden. It isn't that they have it on them. No different than how I have a loaded gun in my home. I don't have it on me, it is in my drawer. I have access to it if needed. I agree, we need to sit down and discuss this. But your thought process of how teachers will be armed is wrong. You can easily look at how other districts are doing it already.
    1
  37. Kyle is very ignorant on guns and is a part of the problem. I am all for having a discussion on issues but when someone cannot get basic facts right you cannot begin to go to opinions. Kyle is a part of the problem and needs to stop talking.
    1
  38. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
    1