Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "The Successful Launch Of Justice Democrats" video.

  1. Darkrai, people are against corruption. It is the whole socialist and SJW platform they are against. Also, corruption exist because of the massive socialist programs the US has. We have been a socialist country since the 30s.
    2
  2. Danny, how did Wolf-PAC go?
    2
  3. Frank, how well have Wolf-PAC done? That has been around over 5 years and has gone no where. Now ultra liberals like TYT and Kyle are doubling down on their ideas even though they continue to lose. This seems like Kyle's idea of becoming a millionaire like Cenk and Ana are.
    2
  4. Kyle is a radical. Anything that isn't full on socialism he is against. " By "their ideas," do you mean ending legalized bribery of politicians? I fail to see how that isn't a major problem that needs to be addressed. " I agree, we should end that. We end that by limiting the power of the federal government, not giving it more power. Why do you want to give that same government the power to run your healthcare and college education? On Wolf Pac, Cenk and Ana are millionaires (well, at least worth millions). Democrats continue to lose and that program has been around for over 5 years with basically no success. People threw their money at it and it went nowhere. But TYT were able to get bigger and richer and hire more people. Think about that.
    2
  5. No word from Bernie yet though.
    1
  6. What legal battles?
    1
  7. What law says that?
    1
  8. Black 13, why is there money in politics? Because they have power to sell. Just like when you give money to someone, typically it is because you are buying something you want. If the federal government has limited powers than it can't be bought since it will have nothing to sell. Limit the power of the federal government and people won't be giving money to politicians.
    1
  9. You can have all the government you want at the state and local level. The more local government is the greater ability the people have to control it. You can also move states if you don't like it and remain a US citizen. So limiting the federal government is a great plan.
    1
  10. TrollGamer, it works well with a lot of our programs. 3/4 of roads are funded at the state and local level. States run and fund K-12 education. States have their own tax laws and driving laws. States do a lot more than what you think. In reality it will work better.
    1
  11. Actually TX has one of the better education system in the US. Also, what state is going to want a dumb population? Think about how much that will hold that state back. Anyway, if you don't live in TX why should you care? You don't vote there nor do you pay taxes. How would you feel if people in TX came to your state and ran it they way they wanted? See what state rights do? You can say TX sucks and make your state smarter as opposed to regressing to the norm established by the federal government. Remember, Bush was governor of TX and also the president.
    1
  12. " And what happens to the people who don't have the money or the means to just up and move?" That is there problem. Why don't they have family and friends in other states? Why can't they just work harder to get out? At that point it is like asking why can't a guy buy a suit for an interview to get a good job? So why not give everyone suits? In reality moving is not hard and people, even poor, do it all the time.
    1
  13. "Texas should not have the right to teach it's students bullshit like creationism." They don't teach that. Look up Dover vs Pennsylvania. A Bush appointed judge ruled on that case for the record.
    1
  14. Never said it was number 1. I said it had one of the best. Being in the top half can account for that.
    1
  15. "That isn't how a civilized society is supposed to treat it's people, especially not the weakest and most disadvantaged" How do you help people? Do you constantly hold their hand or do you allow them to have autonomy?
    1
  16. What should the social safety net be? How do you set it up? How do you account for people abusing it? Do some places even need it? I support social safety nets, but I want them to be managed better. In some cases just giving the money away can work. In others I can see some areas creating a work program for their welfare systems. For example, people who want welfare have to work for the community in some way. In other places charity is enough. It all depends. And before you say republican states won't have it consider this, Indiana has a Medicaid program and Pence was governor of Indiana and before him was Mitch Daniels.
    1
  17. It will be like OWS. Most of the supporters will graduate college, get jobs, start families and realize that socialism does not work.
    1
  18. So,uh, how is Wolf-PAC doing? Wasn't that supposed to be change? I see this whole thing being another Wolf-PAC, a scam to take people's money.
    1
  19. Bruce, he isn't a late bloomer. He is retiring and going out with a bang.
    1
  20. They won
    1
  21. I agree. Clive Barker really had not connections with them. Especially after the most recent one which sucked.
    1
  22. Oh wow, 5 states in 5 years. In 28 years you will maybe get the other 28 states needed.
    1
  23. If the democratic party wants to win again they have to tell crazy feminists, BLM LGBT and other radical groups to literally shut up. That "women's march" was pathetic and are making the left look bad to moderates who are so crucial for any political party to win. As long as you have those radical groups taking over the party, and that includes Bernie, the democrats will continue to lose.
    1
  24. The "independents" he won were college age kids who were just entering politics for the first time. They typically vote left at that young of a age and as they get older realize that socialism does not work.
    1
  25. In this case Kyle and TYT get the money. In reality this is nothing more than a scam to make Kyle worth a million like Cenk and Ana are.
    1