Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Justice Dem Taking On Feinstein Raises $250k In ONE WEEK" video.

  1. They might take a seat or two, but it won't be much. And when they do people will see how crazy they are and vote against them, or they become corrupt themselves.
    5
  2. So much for money out of politics.
    3
  3. Michael Coville, this shows the inconsistency from people like Kyle. As Ben Shapiro pointed out with Cenk, they are against money in politics unless it benefits them.
    1
  4. Chiefs Lightning, billionaires are people as well, and corporations are ran by people.
    1
  5. "If it's small donations from regular folk. No problem." Doesn't matter. "Does anyone legitimately know if there is a max limit on individual/business donations?" There is which is why there are super pacs. But as a whole the "money out of politics" argument is dumb by the left. It is illegal if there is quid pro quo. Besides that it is simply a way to show support for a candidate. No different than some people posting signs, going door to door, giving out flyers, or dedicating an entire show to a particular party and/or candidate like Kyle is doing with Justice Democrats. In fact, those things are not limited. Kyle can talk about nothing but JD in every episode if he wants.
    1
  6. "A corporation giving millions to one candidate is different from 3000 people donating an average of $85" No difference. " The fact that companies are “run by people” is irrelevant." It is relevant. " You want to know why nobody take libertarians seriously? " I am not a libertarian. But do you want to know why JD won't win? Your comment is why.
    1
  7. "Count Deku he honestly believes that rich are good guys which he is admitting that Hillary is also a good person because she is also rich." Doesn't matter to me if someone is rich or not. You can be good if you are rich or poor. You can be bad if you are rich or poor.
    1
  8. "Don't be silly mate... small donations are fine as it creates no conflict of interest to a singular entity." Really? So you won't donate to a candidate unless you agreed with their politics or felt you can gain something? Also, what is the difference between donating money or donating time? "When you allow big money, you create a dynamic for legislative manipulation. Theres a reason crony capitalism is such a big problem. " It become crony capitalism when government has power it can sell. For me I want to limit the powers of the government, especially the federal government so it has nothing to sell thus it can't be bought. "By letting big money entities" Define "big money". Where does it start? And why?
    1
  9. " the difference is pretty big dipshit. When you take money from corporations you represent them" So? Aren't corporations made up of people? Don't corporations provide?
    1
  10. " So you want our politicians to take money from Goldman Sachs and the NRA?" I really don't care. I am more concerned about if they have power or not. If they are limited in power than they can't be bought. At the local level I am more concerned about their policies. So I don't care who they get money from as I don't see it as being automatically bad.
    1
  11. "These are SMALL DOLLAR individual donations. That's what we've been suggesting all along, have you not payed attention to what Kyle has said all these years?" I have been listening to Kyle for years. He complains about corruption in federal politics but then wants that same government to control our healthcare and more of our tax dollars with higher taxes. To me that is similar to complaining about an abusive spouse but then deciding to have kids with them or giving them more alcohol as opposed to leaving the spouse.
    1
  12. "For the bottom lines of their top shareholders" And for the people. Several people buy from corporations. They do make our lives easier in many ways. " And, in reality, they take away seeing as dozens of the top companies pay literal negative taxes." Which I agree is a problem which Trump is wanting to fix with his simplified tax code.
    1
  13. dipojones, it is money in politics.
    1
  14. Robert Neville, what is "get money out of politics". Here is money being sent to a politician.
    1
  15. Oh, "big" money, which is completely arbitrary. What is "big" money to you? And why?
    1
  16. "“Money in politics” refers to money being used to manipulate a politicians decisions on voting." So when Bernie Sanders promises free stuff to people and his supporters give him money and TYT gives him free air time, that is OK? " Cory Booker takes money from pharmaceutical companies and then votes against a drug bill that would save people who are desperate for affordable medicine thousands" Do you have proof of this? Again, you need quid pro quo. As with your other examples, do you have proof? Ever thought they always support those policies and donors wanted them in office? I don't support corruption which is why I support smaller more local government and limited federal government. When the government has limited power it can't be bought, period. You leftist want these politicians to have all this power but then complain when they abuse it. You can't have it both ways.
    1
  17. Count Deku, you support mob rule. You are fine with "small" money in politics as to you they are "the people" and should have power to force rich guys what you want. That is what it comes down to. To me I want to limit the government. You want to give government power to either 1. The majority oppresses the minority 2. The rich buys it Neither is good.
    1
  18. Count Deku, democracy is mob rule. Democracy is 51% telling 49% what to do. "Just because your sorry ass can’t get what you want in government doesn’t mean dick to me." It should. " Would your ideal society allow sharia Christians like Roy Moore to run their own state and make being gay ILLEGAL there? " There are restrictions to what government can do listed in the Constitution. But by your standard if the majority want to make being gay illegal than it should happen.
    1
  19. Count Deku, so if 60% of the country wants to kill gay people would you support it? Also, when put up to a vote 80% of Colorado voters said no to universal healthcare. It seems like the people don't want universal healthcare. As far as government being involved, we already have it with Medicare and Medicaid. But right now you are supporting mob rule.
    1
  20. "uck you. I already explained why there is more that factors into a majority than mindless support." I agree, we should not be running our country based only on what the majority wants. But right now you are contradicting yourself. "Majority support for killing gays will never happen because we live in a civilized society." So? According to you the majority should rule. "Oh, so the best you can do is cite ColoradoCare, which happened over a year ago?" That is very recent.
    1
  21. "I'm well aware that the federal government has power that can be bought. What do you think we've been suggesting? TO GET BIG MONEY OUT OF POLITICS SO IT CAN'T BE FUCKING BOUGHT." So you expect those same government officials to police themselves? Sure, pass a law that gets money out of politics. Meanwhile it still happens. Now what do you do? I guess you should stop it with what? The government? Oh, they are the ones taking the money. "Using tax dollars and having a universal healthcare system isn't by the default government corruption. That's what I was saying. " I agree, but it leads to it. You will have future politicians giving money to certain healthcare providers. Remember when Clinton took millions from Planned Parenthood? That is because she was going to give money back to PP. That is legalized money laundering. Are you OK with PP giving money to Clinton?
    1
  22. Count Deku, you said you support a democracy, which is majority rules. So I gave you an example of the majority wanting to kill gay people. You then moved the goal posts saying we live in a civilized society. To me that would mean being against mob rule. This is why we have a constitution, to place limits on all governments. And at the federal level nothing is ever determined by the simply majority for that reason. "The thing about the American people is that they are very conservative. Any new policy proposal will leave most initially skeptical." Is that bad? So you don't think we should be skeptical? "Obamacare had a minority approval rating for a long time, but now that trump is trying to take it away, people are beginning to understand what it actually does for them and have flipped, and now approve Obamacare more than oppose it." That is not true. People voted for republicans and Trump on the idea of removing Obamacare. "and now this is happening with universal healthcare. For decades this idea was nothing short of a fantasy. But as more counties became successful at implementing it," Successful is subjective and has a lot of variables. Also, none of those countries have 320+ million people or our economic size. "If a majority of Americans want a policy, then it should be implemented," So again, if the majority wants to kill gay people would you want that implemented? Or if the majority wants to ban free speech, would you want that implemented? " A growing 60% means that America is just about ready to move forward with the rest of the world." Again, 80% said now in Colorado. That 60% number is based off a vague question with around 1000 people answering to a poll. That is not an accurate representation of what the people want. But again, you are not consistent with your argument. If 60% wanted to end free speech and wanted people like Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly to no longer have a show according to the law, would you support that?
    1
  23. "How are they crazy?" Their policies are radical.
    1
  24. "I guess you've never heard of Bernie Sanders." I have. He wants the federal government to take over our healthcare system. That is 1/6 of our economy and we are a nation of 320+ million people. That drastic of a change will lead to a major recession. In reality our healthcare system in on par with the rest of the world and in some ways does things very well. He also feels that a federal government that is $20 trillion in debt can manage our money thus he wants to raise everyone taxes. That is insane to me.
    1
  25. Michael Coville, has Bernie Sanders even endorsed JD yet?
    1
  26. Rip Sumrall, the Founding Fathers did something radical, but they were developing a new country. Also, they gave power to the people and limited the powers of the governments, especially the federal government. What they did is the exact opposite of what Bernie Sanders and Justice Democrats want.
    1
  27. Dallas Smith, you may say it saves money (when has a government that is $20 trillion in debt saves money), but with what quality?
    1