Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Ben Shapiro Knows Who The 2020 Democratic Front-Runner Is!" video.

  1. Ben probably knows who Kyle is and doesn't care as Kyle is almost a nobody. Also, in this entire video Kyle did not form a counter argument at all against Shapiro. All he did was mock him. Kyle is triggered by Ben because Ben is a bigger name and much more intelligent than Kyle. Kyle just projects at that point.
    5
  2. Palpameme, Kyle hardly uses facts and logic.
    2
  3. ricky I, Kyle and his fan base will say those economists don't exist. Kyle's problem is that he completely dismisses the other side even though they have strong arguments.
    2
  4. Ruben, Kyle doesn't debate Shapiro because he is scared. Kyle is not even close to the level of intellect that Shapiro is. This is why Kyle just mocks Shapiro and never forms an actual argument against him.
    2
  5. donHooligan, care to give examples?
    2
  6. Ruben, Kyle does not understand the working class. If he did he would not support Bernie Sanders. Kyle is a lost boy in a bubble in his New York studio. And his "populist ideas" don't resonate with the working class and, arguably, won't improve their lives. The working class don't want to see their taxes going up.
    2
  7. Shapiro has two kids.
    2
  8. Bernie is wrong on many things.
    2
  9. The problem with polls is that there hasn't been any debates or attack ads. Looking at polls when no one has campaigned yet is a mistake.
    1
  10. The country has shifted left. As Ann Coulter put it, we elect republicans to remove the federal department of education (that did not exist until the 1970s) and we get No Child Left Behind.
    1
  11. Kyle claims to run with left wing circles when in reality many don't even know who he is. He is a part of the far left that many just laugh at.
    1
  12. The Visitor, Kyle supports Bernie Sanders that pushed a Medicare for all bill that wants to make private healthcare illegal. Don't believe me? Read section 107 of the bill "....it shall be unlawful for a private health insurer to sell health insurance coverage that duplicates the benefits provided under this Act; or an employer to provide benefits for an employee, former employee, or the dependents of an employee or former employer that duplicate the benefits provided under this Act." That sounds really extreme to me.
    1
  13. The Visitor, most of the times links don't work for me. You can look up the bill yourself.
    1
  14. Kyle says the same handful of talking points. He would be an easy person to debate, especially with the research team Shapiro has.
    1
  15. Kel F, Cenk told people to "google it" and started chatting "USA". Cenk lost. On the Southern Strategy Shapiro cited studies. On the tax part it is forcing Cenk to give a number. Cenk talks about raising taxes will improve the economy, so why not a 100% tax rate? Cenk said that is not smart, so than what rate is a good rate? And Cenk is admitting that raising taxes does not always increase revenue nor improves the economy. So even Cenk is admitting that as some point taxes can raised only so much.
    1
  16. Kel F, Shapiro cited a study from the University of Pennsylvania and a study from RealClearPolitics. I listened to his argument. Shapiro also brought up the point how Congress did not switch in the south until 1994. Shapiro listed a reason why republicans started top win in the south and that was due to industry moving down there. My question to you, did you even listen to what he said? Because clearly you didn't. The idea of people admitting to using the southern strategy has been challenged. Look up Matt Christiansen's video where he googled what Cenk asked people to Google. I listened to the portion a lot. He cited how after the Civil Rights Act the democrats went from 21 senators to 20 in the south. On the 0% tax cut rates, what makes that argument poor is that the political right is saying taxes are too high right now. We have the highest corporate tax rate in the world. In some cases people are having 50% of their income taxed. So your argument is poor. The political right is saying taxes are too high now and need to be cut. They don't support a 0% tax rate and many on the right support simplifying the tax code. What Shapiro said is not a strawman. The top 10% earn 40% of the income but pay 70% of federal income taxes. How high is high enough? Social security, medicare and medicaid are running out of money. The solution of the left is to raise taxes. What do you do when it runs out of money again? At what point are the taxes high enough? This is why Shapiro wins these debates. People like you don't even listen to what he says.
    1
  17. Richard Bolitho, to take advantage of those loopholes companies and the rich hire attorneys and accountants. If you lower the tax rate and remove the loopholes than that means instead of spending money on accountants they can spend money elsewhere to create more wealth. Also, the top 10% earn 40% of the income but pay 70% of federal income taxes. That is the truth.
    1
  18. Also, the idea behind the lower capital gains tax is that it gives the incentive for people to hold onto stocks longer. Doing so limits trade alleviate chaos in the stock market.
    1
  19. zeisengreen1913, the rich invest in their company to grow it which creates more wealth for all.
    1
  20. Timin Son, Shapiro has debated many people including members of congress.
    1
  21. Johnny Two Hands, how is what Shapiro says are ridiculous? I see many people making that claim but they can never back it up. Cenk lost at politicon because the facts and logic were not on his side.
    1
  22. Vaas, except he isn't popular and neither is his platform.
    1
  23. Brandon, his platform is not popular. If it was than it would be passed in many states. If people support healthcare for all then why did close to 80% of voters in Colorado voted against universal healthcare? Reality is that the polls that Kyle points to are unreliable.
    1
  24. Fernando, I did not know that. I found the video. I mean, it makes sense. Kyle hardly steps out of his bubble and gets around 30,000 views a video. So I can see why he does not know him.
    1
  25. Vaas, if Bernie ran against Trump Bernie will win 10 states at best. He has way too much dirt.
    1
  26. I don't troll on his channel. I challenge people here with an opposing viewpoint.
    1
  27. Why? Do you want Kyle to be embarrassed?
    1
  28. Johnny Two Hands, except, for the most part, the truth is on Ben's side and hardly on Kyle's side.
    1
  29. Pakman did not beat him, it was more or less a push.
    1
  30. It is arguable that not having children is being selfish. Not having kids is not caring about life beyond your death.
    1
  31. Zidneya, if you have kids you care about their future. That means you will make sacrifices to better their lives. That is a strong argument against the estate tax or inheritance tax. If you don't have kids you only care about yourself and will take actions to only better your situation as after you are dead who cares what you have left. That does not mean people without kids don't care about the future, or people with kids will push to better the lives of their kids. But as a whole that is what it is.
    1
  32. What "imaginary lives"? And what "unborn lives"? Also, I don't have kids either.
    1
  33. You have a kid you can pass your knowledge and work ethics to that kid and many people are judged by their kids.
    1
  34. Zidneya, you can care about others if you have kids, but you have no one to pass on your legacy. Many people are judged by their kids. I am not agreeing with Shapiro 100% here, I am saying that there is an argument to be made for what he said. You just go on this pathetic rant that makes you look asinine.
    1
  35. Many people judge you based on how your kids turn out. That is the difference it makes.
    1
  36. Purple Clouds, I never said that.
    1