Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Michael Moore: Dems Need To Be A Party For Workers" video.
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"When was Moore a politician? "
He is a political activist that leans left. Essentially the same as Kyle and Rush Limbaugh. They are involved in politics.
"But what exactly do you want him do do? "
He complains about other people struggling while owning 9 homes. Why does he own 9 homes? If he is a landlord and runs low income housing then fine. Or if he has those homes to be a place for some sort of healthcare, like therapy for example for the mentally ill, that is fine. Does he? I can't say for sure. But nothing I read shows that he actually does. That instead he owns 9 homes. I don't expect him to help out everyone, but with his wealth and income he can help out some. He can try to help the people of Flint.
"Bernie is affluent through decades in politics which is a fairly high
paying job. How does him selling a book take away from the policies he
has been fighting for for decades? "
Because again, it is all talk. What has he done to help people? You may say that he does by being a politician. Ok, then why did he wait until now to run for president? Why didn't he do it after Bush?
I will agree that being a politician is a way to help out society, but most have done other work before that. What has Bernie done? He could not even pay his bills. That is an issue. He mooched off of others.
"Where is your grief with way richer republican and democratic politicians then?"
Because they are not demanding to take more of my money and saying they are doing it for my benefit. At the very least, with the fact that Bernie could not run his finances when he was my age, I am very suspicious. Bernie could not pay his bills. I do. But yet he feels that by raising my taxes he can benefit me?
" But what people like Bernie is fighting for is systemic change where
the the people are given more leverage and the rich guy can“t skew
policies to his own advantage. "
I agree, however that is because of big government in which Bernie wants to make bigger. Also, Bernie and Moore did not get rich with grit. Bernie became a politician when he could not find a job elsewhere. Moore sued the company he worked for and made movies of him walking around with a camera and profiting off of other people's struggle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"The company I worked for before I retired and what they are doing on healthcare while making strong profits is not rare in today's America."
A lot of companies give out healthcare. Those that don't do so for one simple reason, they can't afford to. I bet your company could not afford to either. You complain about your boss but in reality if you were to cut the pay of a boss down to zero it would not do anything to raise worker's salaries. Take, for example, Walmart. If you were to take the salaries of the top 6 executives of Walmart and spread it to the 525,000 lowest paid workers of Walmart those workers will earn an extra $147 a year. That's it.
"Anyway if you look at the polls more than 50% of the people in America want Medicare for all or a single payer plan"
Polls are very deceptive and vague. While they may support it, if you ask them about taxes the majority do not want higher taxes. In Colorado, a left leaning state that voted for Bernie in the primaries, 80% said no to universal healthcare. In every state it has been tried it fail with no uproar. Republicans ran on the idea of repealing Obamacare and won. You look at polls when every other indicator shows differently. You keep looking at polls that are wrong.
".you say people in other countries enjoy their healthcare system...and they may do. But Sanders isn't willing to look at the short comings...because the debate is about a better system with fewer short comings not a 100% perfect model nothing man made is perfect but the Universal system is much better for everyone and thats the point not that it could still have a few short comings"
Read the book "The Business of Health". There they break down the numbers in healthcare and show other countries are not better. You say they are but give zero evidence of the fact. Just saying they are better does not make it true. Bernie does not give any numbers either on healthcare. He just says in other countries they do it better. And when pushed with actual facts and pricing he goes to a subjective poll. That is all he has. Meanwhile, in the US we are moving away from a system like that with Republicans winning and states saying no where in Colorado 80% said no. If people wanted universal healthcare a state would have passed it by now.
"And yes when you met many people from different countries that all have the same type of system and they all use that system and its been around for 50..40..30..years and they all speak highly of that system...a word to the wise,take heed on that message,because its working."
I like the US system. Everyone I met in the US like it. So by your low standards the US system is great.
"And when small businesses or even larger ones don't offer decent healthcare benefits its much harder to keep good help because this issue is very important to families/workers. "
EXACTLY, that is how the free market works. Businesses want to pay more. You contradicted yourself when you talk about greedy companies. Businesses want to pay more but don't for one simple reason, they can't afford it.
"My point isn't about hurting the small business owner but a healthcare system change will help them."
It won't as they would not be able to afford the higher taxes. Bernie wants to expand the payroll tax which is a wage killer.
"listen to Mark Blyth on this subject."
I listened to him. He is not an economists and went on a rant about Friedman that made zero sense. But as a whole, he is not an economist. I don't know why people take what he says in that issue that seriously.
" And as we move away from the small business world into the bigger companies we know record profits are being made the wealth gap "
Income and wealth are not equal. Also, there are large profits for two reasons.
1. Larger companies with more shares
2. They were not willing to invest with Obama. If Bernie were in office they would not invest at all.
" wages are pretty stagnant for many years."
Wage stagnation is a myth. If you use the PCE of GDP deflator method of inflation wages have been going up. Also, inflation tends to over exaggerate the rate, this is called the "Boskin rule". As a whole wage stagnation is a myth.
1
-
"The company I retired from could very well pay a lot more towards the healthcare plan"
Great, that is your one anecdotal evidence. Maybe you should have found a new job.
" Again its common today to see well to do companies not offering healthcare or offering horrible plans."
Because they can't afford it. Also, the number one problem I have is that our healthcare situation is so that people rely on their employers for healthcare to begin with. I am in favor of ending that by removing the payroll tax.
"And to say people are happy with the healthcare system in America..no disrespect, is just plain crazy. "
But it exists and as recent elections shown the are the majority.
"Town Hall meetings and healthcare rallies were popping up all across the country with citizens very upset with our system"
But yet 80% of voters in Colorado said no. And nothing is getting passed in other states.
" Thats why even in red states when Sanders did town meetings on this issue even the people who support the GOP applauded him"
What evidence is there that they supported the GOP?
" And lets not forget we pay more in healthcare costs than countries like Canada we pay twice sometimes three times as much in our system...how is that better or even just as bad??"
My boss pays more for rent than I do in our apartments. Does that mean my apartment is better? Saying we pay more is not an argument. There is a lot more to it. A car that cost more is typically better than one that cost less.
"And you say business want to pay more...well in reality they rather work on the shoe string level and take their chances then offer strong wages and good benefits."
If an employer does not pay an employee well they will not get the good employees.
" Companies in a capitalist system only think of the bottom line..the greatest profits,"
And you do as well. You think about your profits as well which is why you want universal healthcare and a higher wage.
"As for payroll tax or paying more in taxes in general does not kill workers if these taxes are used to help citizens when it comes to healthcare or higher education..so forth,its a strong investment into the country"
The payroll tax taxes payroll. If a company were to give someone a raise they would have to pay a higher payroll tax. That is why businesses pay with benefits to begin with. You not only want to raise the payroll tax but you want to allow the government to give healthcare benefits as well. That is reducing wages for workers in numerous ways.
1. No more benefits
2. Higher taxes
3. Higher taxes on employer if they were to give out a higher wage, so they won't give our raises.
"If wages kept up with production we would be at much higher levels in 2018"
Very deceptive. To start, from very basic stats hourly earnings have kept up with productivity. Unit labor cost is positive meaning hourly compensation is outpacing productivity. Also, you have to factor in that productivity is up due to technology, and more productivity means better goods and services that are cheaper. For example, cars today get better mileage, last longer and are safe, all of which save money in the long run. That is essentially a wage increase.
" In the end we both see these issues through different lenses we could dance this dance in circles from now to the end of time we are both fairly well versed in our teachings and beliefs"
I question that as you cited Blyth as if he is a legit economist. You also brought up the myth of wage stagnation and failed to realize the numerous variables involved.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1