Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Trump Supporter SHOCKED By Our Broken, Corrupt For-Profit Healthcare System" video.

They are progressive. They understand that Trump is the route for positive change.
6
@mistym0rning prior to the scamdemic wages were going up, worker participation was going up, home ownership was going up. The overall economy was doing great. It took democrat ran states shutting down by overblowing a virus to try to make him look bad. It is not going to work.
4
@mistym0rning think about it, Democrat could never beat him on principle. It was either Russia, Ukraine, pointless impeachment, calling Kavanaugh a rapist, and over exaggerating a virus. If he was so bad surely people can come up with better.
4
@MPostma72 deaths are overstated. Almost all were either old or sick begin with and thus near death overall. For example, 40% were nursing home patients. According to UCSF 50% of new nursing home patients die in 5 months. Also, it is not going strong, cases are drop and the death rate continues to drop as well. So yes, it is overblown.
3
@thepatbackexperience4573 "Our rate relative the population is highest out of any other nation" Not true, we are 10th according to worldometer. You can't just keep giving money away as the dollar will collapse. Also, people do not want to stay home. People are no longer buying the fear mongering of the virus. "I don't see how you can lable our response overblown when nations took very strict lockdown policies " Other nations like Italy, Spain and the UK did worse in deaths. Sweden never shut down. It is also questionable if shut downs even work. CA shut down and never saw cases drop. We are overblowing this because each and every day people less people are caring and are willing to live with it, and this virus is showing not to be that deadly. "Studies indicate that about 30-40% of the population will catch the virus under poor social distancing guidelines" Great, herd immunity. Because of the shutdowns suicide rates are up, antidepressant use is up where we have a shortage. Substance abuse is up. Depression is up. Is it worth it? "The evidence shows that a total lockdown is the best way to go" I don't agree. This virus is being overblown and our reaction is not justified at this point. Millions of people's lives are being harmed because of the lockdowns. Compare it to this. 40,000 die a year in traffic accident. Capping speeds to 15 mph will make that number to be zero. So why don't we do that? Because that will lead to worse outcomes. Same is with this virus. Lockdowns may slow down the spread, same with distancing, but it is leading to worse results overall.
3
@CeezGeez nope. Also, this tweet can be twisted the other way that our lack of a free market healthcare system causes these problems.. It goes both ways.
2
@martinfiedler4317 read my comment to Kira. Basically higher wages, home ownership being up, labor participation growing, overall, a much better economy. It took democrats shutting down the economy by overblowing a virus to try to make him look bad.
2
@MPostma72 huh? There were only 40,000 cases yesterday. Cases are dropping now. And deaths are low as well. And it will disappear at November 4.
2
@thepatbackexperience4573 we are not the highest globally. Per capita we are 10th beating developed nations like Spain, the UK and Italy. So no, we do not have the highest death rates per capita. You can't just throw money out there as it will lead to inflation and devaluing of the dollar. And the evidence is not strong that early lockdowns would work. CA was the first state to lock down and so no reduction in cases. In fact, they are at their peak now. Also, what good is money if you can't go out and spend it? European nations have a different culture thus the stricter lockdowns. However, it did not work is still spread. They are open now because of herd immunity, something we a approaching now and have in many states already. "So far there's no concrete evidence towards her immunity" Yes there is. A Science article mentioned people are developing long term immunity via T-cells. Another Science article from researchers at Penn State suggested that the infection number, early on, was 80 times higher than what was reported. That means in March, in NY alone, there were 5 million infected. Also, just need herd immunity in our large cities. "So far all of the stats show that biting the bullet and doing a stricter lockdown equals less death" No it doesn't. NY and NJ did strict lockdowns and have the highest death rate in the US. FL, AZ, GA and TX don't and their death rates are low. All the lock downs done at this point is ruin the economy and have fools hiding in fear.
2
Not necessarily. Both sides can develop arguments. These issues are complex. One can use this tweet to argue for a free market healthcare system as we do not have one.
1
Kylem how am I wrong?
1
@thepatbackexperience4573 plus, if the economy is lockdown, what good is money? And how can I buy things I need? A complete lockdown is impossible, especially in the US with our culture. College kids are now partying. I walked by one yesterday.
1
Carissa Wu uh, government has been trying to "fix" healthcare for decades, that is why we have problems. We have a heavily regulated system. For example, in the 80s Medicare was was running out of money because healthcare providers will take in patients, give them too much care, and leave them in there too long. So reform was done in that decade to cap how much Medicare is willing to pay and for what. Thus, to make up the difference healthcare providers starting charging more for little things like a band aid. If we asked for more government regulations either prices will go up, or quality and access will drop. That will be especially true if we had M4A. Repealing Obamacare (which a complete repeal of has not happened) is a good route. Forcing people to buy healthcare insurance is not the free market. Also, having healthcare insurance being healthcare is a problem as well. Think about it, why does healthcare insurance pay for basically every form of healthcare? Because for most it is a form of payment by the employers. It would be similar to car insurance paying for oil changes. Healthcare insurance should only pay for unplanned, expensive situations, rest out of pocket. That can be done if people bought their own plans as opposed to relying on employers. That will also solve other problems as well such as forcing insurance companies to compete, having people get the plans they want, and being able to move around on jobs. The "pandemic" is a scam. This virus is not that dangerous. Now it is just being used to make people's lives miserable to try to beat Trump. But with college starting along with K-12 schools, when people start seeing not spread over the next couple of months, things will open up and the economy will quickly get going. And the economy doing great before the "pandemic" does matter. It means that the economy did not fall because of some flaw in the system but instead of government forcing shutdowns. I do watch Kyle's videos. As Stephen Michael Davis said, Kyle only has 6 different arguments and just recycles them.
1
Just like all "progressives" will say is "medicare 4 all". It goes both ways.
1
This does not mean they support a left wing position in healthcare. Sure, the system has flaws, but it does not mean more government is the answer. The reason why we have problems in healthcare is because we do not have a free market system.
1
It cost that much to subsidize other parts of healthcare. For example, Medicare caps how much they are willing to pay. This was after reform passed in the 80s because people felt the elderly need access to care, but medicare was spending way too much. So instead of getting rid of it, law were made to cap how much they were willing to pay. Medicare pays 40% less than private insurance. Thus, healthcare providers make up the difference this way.
1