Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Far-Right Says Evil Bill Nye Is Calling For Their Deaths" video.
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"neither has 90% of the Republican party or the president but they seem to not be questioned abut their lol scientific, "facts.""
Democrats do not have any formal scientific work as well, so what's your point?
"sorry again i'll take bill nigh any day of the week. "
What about me? I am a moderate and I have actual formal studies in science. I have actual papers published in peer reviewed journals. But again, why are you not calling out democrats?
"source? please oh please tell me source, I'm loving such all out crap."
I called you out for a source. However, Scott Pruitt said climate change is happening. The right wing commentators that are big now, such as Ben Shapiro, said it is happening. They know it is happening as it has been happening for over 4 billion years.
"yeah aside from how many scientists claiming it's real and oh surprise the democrats agreeing with the actual scientists?
"
Again, Democrats have no scientific background as well. You are clearly missing the point. However, you will be hard pressed to find scientists saying it is an actual threat, which republicans agree with.
"yeah i also remember him saying the scientists are telling us this,
let's listen, which sounds like actual fucking advice and good sense to
me?"
I have yet to hear Bernie Sanders list any of theses scientists or being any on stage or on the air with him. Anyone can say "listen to scientists". Ok, who? List them?
On the chromosome issue, the Snopes article allowed the excuse of saying that Bill Nye simply "evolved" on his knowledge and ideas. That is a lame excuse. The reality is that he is a mechanical engineer, not a practicing scientist. He is not an biologist. He has little understanding of biology nor has never done any formal research in it. I see nothing that suggests he "evolved" there. Snopes did not debunk anything. What was being shown is that Bill Nye just repeats what is said to him.
On Bill Nye supporting arresting people, it is clear. He supports arresting people who disagree with him on climate change. I have saw the full clip. It is clear. There is no way you can dance around that.
The rest of your comment after that is incoherent. You went on about religion, pragerU and Dennis Miller. What are you trying to do?
Bill Nye is wrong here. He is appealing to an ultra liberal crowd.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ncc 0990, that is not how insurance works. Insurance is a two party agreement between the company and consumer. The consumer is willing to pay a fee to a company and if something unplanned that is extreme and expensive happens then the company will pay for it. And if not in the end the person buying the insurance ends up paying something for nothing, and the company earns revenue. If you, as a consumer, participates in risky behavior, however, then the company can drop you.
Take care insurance for example. If you have multiple accidents that are your fault then your rate will go up or you company will drop you. But in the end car insurance pays for unplanned accidents that are expensive, such as if someone totals your car. But won't pay for oil changes.
The problem we have is because of the payroll tax businesses use insurance as a form of payment it essentially healthcare insurance has become healthcare. That is the problem. But in the end insurance is not you paying or other people's care, or at least it should not be.
You, as well, do not understand insurance. You do not plan to use insurance as if you do then something extreme that is expensive happened to you. Please, to fully understand the issue at hand, learn what insurance is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Yeah that means very little when you also realize technically more people believe in the devil then evolution in America, "
I see no evidence of that.
"flat eathism not only still exists but is widespread and popular,"
I would not call it popular and overall, is a non-issue as only radicals bring it up.
"lol anti-intellectualism attracts far more becasue it's less hard to
understand and goes off mostly pure emotion, particularity hate,
arrogance and spite..."
You are looking at extreme groups that are really the minority of the country.
"Crowder is again full of shit, easily debunked by anyone who pays a mind to"
Ok, debunk him. How is he wrong?
"lol good for you, any reason other than, "gender issues trigger me?"
cause that's basically all Steven has when you boil it down..."
Let us look at this rant that Nye made. The ultra left claims that republicans and the political right are "anti-science", but their only example is how they disagree on climate change. On climate change you will be hard pressed to find scientists who feel it is a major threat. On the right, though, they feel climate change is happening. Even Steven Crowder said it is and that man is playing a role. They just feel it is a not a threat and that the government is not the source in dealing with it.
However, in this rant by Bill Nye he pushes for more investment in science. Both sides agree in that. As Neil deGrasse Tyson, no republican wants to die poor. That is why they support investment in science as it is how we progress and become wealthier as a nation. Thing is that they do not want to invest heavily in climate change policies such as carbon taxes or forcing "green" energy that are not efficient. Bill Nye, however, takes the climate change issue and uses it to smear republicans by claiming they are anti-science. He does not give other examples in that. What he basically does is the equivalent in saying that I hate baseball because I hate the New York Yankees. I love baseball, I just hate the Yankees. Republicans support investment in science, just not heavily in climate change. Also, Bill Nye never discusses the actual issue of climate change.
I do not need to go to the gender issue, I can stick to the issue addressed in this video.
1
-
1