Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Rich Goon Criticizes Dems In Dumbest Way Possible" video.

  1. This guy is correct. The political left is extreme right now. They want to tax from the rich and give to those who hardly work. And they do so on the message of "fair" and "decency". Also, the polls have not been reliable. They are opinions, and just because the majority wants something does not mean we should to it. If polls said that slavery should be legal, should we do it? Even at that, 60% support medicare for all, but 80% in Colorado said no. Fact is that the economy is doing well. If Democrats tried to push their policies to win elections people will question them and vote against them.
    4
  2. Coffe H., there is way too much to cover here. If you can pick one topic or issue Kyle said I can easily debunk it. But I can't cover all. I do have responsibilities.
    3
  3. I saw that Amy Vilela lost. Way to go Justice Democrats. You sure are making changes.
    2
  4. Kyle is not too bright when it comes to economics. All of his talking points can easily be debunked. That is why politicians hardly talk about them.
    2
  5. Anthony, you have to work for your money. Even if they lower taxes if you don't work you don't have money. The democrats just want to give you money no matter what. There lies the difference.
    2
  6. Raizhen010, I am not a republican. I am a moderate. Justice Democrats are radicals and them losing is great as it shows that no one is buying the ultra leftist BS pushed by TYT and Kyle and that the Bernie wave went nowhere. It shows that there is strong hope for this country as radicals are losing. So far you have the chance to win one election. That's it, one. I will give credit when a JD win. So far I see only one winning, that's it. Ro Khanna does not count. He was in congress prior to JD forming and now all of a sudden he is a JD. He is the establishment.
    1
  7. Raizhen010, I have not ignored that some JD won the primaries. I broke down how none of them, except one, are going to win. Going up against an incumbent who had over 60% of the votes last time is not a good sign for some of those Justice Democrats.
    1
  8. Raizhen010, there has always been corruption in politics. You cannot end that. Also, a lot of it is legal as it is supporting a politician. When people donated money to Bernie, or when TYT gave him free air time, that is no different than the NRA donating to the campaign of a politician they. Same with planned parenthood. That is legal as there is no quid pro quo. What you have to do is limit the powers of the government. You want to give more powers to the federal government and expect it not to be bought out by electing the "right" people. That has never worked. Universal background checks exist already. You are pushing for gun confiscation by trying to add more laws on already existing laws. I think the ACA should be eliminated and I feel a free market system can alleviate the pre-existing conditions problem. I never said I wanted everything privatized.
    1
  9. Raizhen010, I do not oppose the majority. Even if I did we do not run our country on mob rule. Again, money has always existed in politics. The Founding Fathers knew that which is why the pushed to limit government. The pre-existing conditions problem can be solved through the free market. Also, people voted in Republicans to repeal Obamacare. I am glad they are doing their job. The political pendulum always swings back and forth. I remembered in 2009 when everyone thought the Republicans were dead. They came back. I know and understand that. As long as we elect moderate democrats and moderate republicans we will be fine. We need to avoid radicals like Justice Democrats.
    1
  10. Raizhen010, I agree insurance companies are a problem. Why? Because we do not have a free market system in healthcare. If you read my comment I said a free market system will alleviate the pre-existing conditions problem. Again, we do not run the country on mob rule. If the majority wanted slavery would you think we should allow it?
    1
  11. Also, the majority do not want Justice Democrats as they are losing these elections.
    1
  12. There is a difference between wealth and income. The top 10% earned only 40% of the total income but paid around 70% of federal income taxes.
    1
  13. Kyle, my own research
    1
  14. anticorncob6, i don't
    1
  15. Kyle, also kyle does not have an economics degree
    1
  16. T A Ship, does it matter?
    1
  17. T A Ship, "trickle down economics" is not an economic term. Also, I did not criticize Kyle for not having an econ degree. Someone asked if I have done my own research or if I have a degree in this field. My assumption was economics. I said I did my own research, but do not have a degree in econ. I pointed out how Kyle doesn't either so if they were to dismiss me for not having a degree I can do the same for Kyle. That was my point in bringing that up.
    1
  18. GravianS, I hardly ever run away unless the replies are incredibly asinine and not worth my time. Pick any point that Kyle said in this video and i will debunk it.
    1
  19. Midterms always see lower turnout.
    1
  20. Dead Sirius, in the 20s the Fed did not raise interest rates leading to the crash. Guess what the Fed did today? And guess what they plan on doing two more times this year?
    1
  21. The government cannot erase public debt tomorrow.
    1
  22. It is true when you look at federal income taxes.
    1
  23. The argument is that the democrat plan will hurt the majority with a poor economy.
    1
  24. Ken, they paid quite a bit. Jeff Bezos only earns $80,000 a year.
    1
  25. GravianS, I told the truth. You have one person saying that Bezos has billions when in reality he is worth billions. Income is different than wealth. Bezos is worth billions because he has large shares of Amazon. For income he earns around $80,000 a year. That is more of the truth than the other person posted.
    1
  26. GravianS, yes, income is a subset of wealth. But for many it is a small subset. Even for home owners where 60% of their wealth is tied to their home. You can't point to someone like Bezos and claim he has millions when in reality he doesn't. He has that much in wealth but not income.
    1
  27. So I have a 20 point IQ when I am a PhD student in physical chemistry? Jeff Bezos is worth that much because he is the major share holder of Amazon, a very successful company that is valued high. You could make me worth millions by giving me the Hope diamond. It is valued at $350 million. I would still only have $1000 to my name. So my income level does not change, only my net worth simply by giving me one small item that is valued high. To strip away Bezos worth you literally have to shut down most of Amazon. Bezos has earned it. He started his company in a garage.
    1
  28. GravianS, your understanding of this topic is very poor. Mark Zuckerburg paid himself $1 at one point but was still worth millions due to his ownership in Facebook. Warren Buffet pays himself $100,000 a year but he is worth billions. How is that possible? He is the major shareholder of his company. Please try to understand the difference between wealth and income.
    1
  29. Consumer confidence is high. That is why interest rates are going up to slow down spending.
    1
  30. What?
    1
  31. StrikeWing17971, I agree, but we are far from the max. The finite world you are talking about is when everything is 100% automated which we will never see in our lifetimes. Even at that then we run into the problem of over population where we need to start considering populating other planets/moons. So there will always be room for growth.
    1
  32. StrikeWing17971, there are plenty of jobs out there. That is why the unemployment rate is going down below the natural rate and why initial claims are dropping along with worker participation going up.
    1
  33. StrikeWing17971, poor communities have lower cost of living. Also, people are not moving there.
    1
  34. StrikeWing17971, people are not moving there. That is the point
    1
  35. StrikeWing, they are dying areas. Giving money to them will not help them as no one with skills are moving there. Giving them money is not going to give those people healthcare or jobs. Businesses are not investing there.
    1
  36. Economic mobility is not a myth. There are several factors involved, but it is not a myth.
    1
  37. w9j15g, business who pay close to the min. wage that do not rely on part time high school employees because the min. wage is too high. It has priced them out of the market. To be fair Walmart only hires those who are 18 and older for legal reasons (such as selling and handling alcohol), but as a whole the min. wage increase prices teens out of the market. Taxing the rich more does not generate more revenue. They just pass it on to the middle class. The rich are rich for a reason, they are smart with money. Taxing them more is not going to keep them from being rich.
    1
  38. Michio, "fair" would be a flat tax. It isn't about the rich benefiting more from society. They simply worked harder. In reality they actually offered more to society to get where they are at.
    1
  39. They can't pay employees more for one simple reason, they can't afford it.
    1
  40. The top 10% earned 40% of the income but paid around 70% of the federal income tax.
    1