Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "BREAKING: Who Will Kyle Be Debating At Politicon?" video.

  1. Mousey, that is correct. Kyle is a child. Also, he is poor in debates because he does not know the issues well enough to go beyond talking points. His anger is simply his ignorance showing.
    7
  2. Troy Barnes, correct. Also, Ann has published 12 books and Kyle has accomplished what? Coulter has a lot of experience.
    6
  3. ChillsWithSloths, Kyle is not a policy wonk. Kyle gets angry during debates because he does not know the issues well enough to debate them. He has talking points and when pressed beyond that he gets very angry which is a sign of ignorance. No different than Ana and Cenk. Ann Coulter is not the brightest in way of communicating to everyone, so he may do well against her, but it still doesn't change the fact that Kyle has little idea what he is talking about.
    4
  4. Colony Three, socialists do worship government. You want government to be expanded and control a lot of aspects of your life. Collecting taxes without representation is arguably illegal. One can argue that the federal income tax is done without representation. Prior to 1913 the federal tax was a tax on the states. Why? Because the representatives at the federal level did not represent the people but instead the states. So there is a strong argument there. Congress had the authority to tax, but that was to tax the states, not the people by the way the Founders intended. I know my history bud. When you become jealous and use government force to take from those and give to you, that is a problem.
    3
  5. Evan, Seder just strawmans and pulls logical fallacies when he debates. When Peter Schiff debated him Schiff worked past that and made Seder look like a fool.
    3
  6. Pass Kall, Coulter is smart. You don't write 12 best selling books unless you are smart.
    2
  7. Colony Three, he has a legit point. You don't steal and you don't become jealous of your neighbor's stuff and you don't worship government.
    2
  8. nooberrific, Colony Three did no such thing. He was wrong on history of taxation in this nation but failed to admit to it, and I said there are arguments to be made. I never said he was wrong. I even said there are arguments to be made on his side. I accept there are arguments to be made on both sides.
    2
  9. Zeeshaan, Kyle is not that knowledgeable. He repeats the same things over and over again and when pressed he gets very angry. Being angry is a sign of ignorance. Kyle will not keep his cool because when pushed he will not know what to say and just get angry and repeat talking points. I am glad Kyle is stepping outside of his bubble for once, but it won't go well for him. It might depending on the topic, but chances are it won't.
    1
  10. ChillsWithSloths, I don't follow foreign policies so I can't comment there. On economic issues like healthcare, the min. wage and the current economic growth Kyle is wrong. And it isn't that he is wrong just a little bit, he is vastly wrong. Based on that I have a hard time trusting what he says on foreign issues. On Fox News that was a short segment of around 5 minutes. The longer the debate goes you will see Kyle getting angry as his talking points can only go so far.
    1
  11. nooberrific, I saw the Razorfist debate. Razorfist was correct on many things but did not support his argument well. Kyle said the same old talking points.
    1
  12. throatgorge2, care to give examples?
    1
  13. Colony Three, supply side economics has not been debunked. He also does not use religion to dictate his policies. It is arguable that Nazis were left wing on many issues. You claim that those issues are debunked when they are argued amongst scholars and intellectuals. Congrats, you have the same intelligence level of Kyle which is not something to be proud of. Tec Cruz is very intelligent and he showed that by destroying Bernie Sanders in a debate. But I guess that isn't hard to do.
    1
  14. Colony Three, I saw that debate and I saw the that Danish guy give anecdotal evidence which does not counter what Cruz said. By that standard the US healthcare system is great because I never had any problems with it. Supply side has not been debunked. What happened in 1929 and in the 2000s were artificially low interest rates set by the Federal Reserve. And what made it worse were easy money policies such as the bail outs. And you keep bringing up KS when many states, like TX, have done well. Same with Washington with low taxes. And many states with high taxes struggle. The Nazis were arguably left wing. Many policies they did were left wing such as expansion of government and government jobs.
    1
  15. Colony Three, the spending programs by the Nazis were not successful. What they did was create a war. If massive spending was successful why didn't it work in the US?
    1
  16. Lord Crump, most people don't have a problem with the healthcare system in the US. That does not mean it doesn't have problems.
    1
  17. Lord Crump, it is very debatable. How about you look up what Shapiro actually said and his reasoning for why he said it.
    1
  18. Kyle doesn't like debates because he can't argue his ideas. He just has talking points. He repeats the same things over and over again and when pressed he gets angry because he doesn't know the issues well enough to go beyond talking points. His anger is a sign of ignorance.
    1
  19. Thomas, I come here often and I outline how wrong Kyle is on the issues. Kyle is essentially a SJW. When pressed he will completely discredit the other side and say "that's not true" without providing evidence.
    1
  20. Ann Coulter is not that great but she is far superior than Kyle. At least Kyle is stepping outside of his bubble.
    1
  21. Kyle thinks almost every idea is not up to debate because he is extremely bias, myopic and dismisses the other side. On healthcare he claims there is not debate and that Medicare for all is the best route when in reality there is a strong debate on the issue. Kyle claims there is not debate on the min. wage when in fact there is. On climate change the debate is how much does man play a role and if it is a threat. Kyle is pulling logical fallacies with his statements which is a problem.
    1
  22. I am surprised Ann is agreeing to this considering how Kyle is essentially a nobody. Feels like she is going after low hanging fruit.
    1
  23. Colony Three, care to show when Shapiro said that.
    1
  24. Colony Three, they do worship the government. As of now the Constitution does give Congress the authority to collect taxes. Your idea of what the Founders wanted is false, that is the point. And that is why it is arguable we have taxation without representation. You can argue the other way as well. The EPA is arguably unconstitutional. Roads are locally ran and funded where you have representation. Same with bridges. Border patrol is a part of foreign affairs which is the federal government's job. KS is around average in economic growth. They are fine. You point to KS when I can point to CA with high taxes and the fact they had cities that went bankrupt, and the highest poverty rate.
    1
  25. nooberrific, I don't use the Venezuela argument nor do I hardly use the slavery argument.
    1
  26. Colony Three, it is fine to worship the government until you expand it and evade on other people's lives.
    1
  27. nooberrific, there is an argument to be made in banning pornography.
    1
  28. Colony Three, porn takes advantage of people in a dire situation and can ruin people's lives. What I find to be ironic about the left is that they preach about workers' protection when in the porn industry women are hardly even protected. They are used and then no longer get jobs. Meanwhile their mistake is online for all to see which can ruin their future. I personally know a girl who did a porno and was fired from her job. She never received a call for another shoot and now her life is ruined.
    1
  29. Colony Three, you were wrong on the history of taxation in this nation. Also, I never said taxation was theft, you said that. I said one can make the argument that federal income taxes on individuals is taxation without representation. There is a desire to have taxes. You need to understand the role of the federal government and the state and local governments in order to really understand my position and the argument I can make. To do that you need to know the history of this nation.
    1
  30. Colony Three, I guess I should be more clear. There is a legit argument to be made there. The problem with you is that you completely dismiss the other side which makes you myopic and ignorant.
    1