Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Colossal Majority Of Americans Want Gun Reform | Poll Numbers" video.

  1. The Mother Flickers, point by point 1. On the furniture comparison he was not comparing universal healthcare to that, he is comparing healthcare to that. He is saying something factual, that healthcare is a commodity where someone has to provide it. Also, what is true is that healthcare is not a free market. There are many government restrictions that caused a monopoly that made it so prices have gone up. His comparison to furniture is that you can decide what type of furniture to buy and shop around which improves the quality and lowers the price. For example, I bought a cheap chair and it has lasted me over 5 years. It is comfortable as well. You can't do that with healthcare. Now yes there are some cases where it is life dependent and you can't shop around, but that is what insurance is for. That is a different discussion but you should be able to shop around for insurance. But many forms of healthcare you should be able to shop around for such as an x-ray for example. He made the comparison to LASIK that is not tied to insurance and has become cheaper and better over the years. His point was correct in that we lack a free market system in healthcare which drives up prices. I will post a video on that along with an article on how the government hurt the free market system. 2. I cannot comment on Israel so I will have to plea ignorance on that. I do not make comments on issues I have not looked into. 3. Money does equal speech. Unless there is quid pro quo there is nothing illegal. There are many ways to support a candidate. You can post signs up (which someone pays to print off), you can rally, you can go door to do, etc. That cost time and money. Some people donate money to a politician they support so they can pay to have signs made and do commercials. When people donated $27 to Bernie that was so he can pay for his campaign. There is no difference between that and someone posting a sign up. As he put it would Bernie rather have TYT give him $10,000 or dedicate an entire channel to kissing his ass? TYT supported Bernie by giving him free advertising. You can argue that when a company like Planned Parenthood gave money to Clinton it was so they can benefit, but there are a few points there. One, there was on guarantee she would have won so there is no guarantee they would have obtained something. Two, even if she did win there is no guarantee they would have obtained something. Three, when people gave Bernie $27 they were looking to benefit as well. So it goes both ways. Also, on TYT giving Bernie free advertising, many on the left, including Kyle, complained about Trump getting free advertising from the media. What does that mean? That means to campaign you need money to create and air commercials. That money is speech. I will post a video. 4. Some facts on spending. Since 1960 defense spending went from 10% of GDP to 3%. SS went from 2% of GDP to around 5%. Medicare went from 0% to 3%. We spend more on SS than we do in defense. Over the years defense has been getting cut while medicare and SS have been increasing. They are a bigger problem in the deficit. He is correct in saying that SS, medicare and medicaid are around 60% of the budget. He also never said "cut", he said "restructure". Now can you say that means cut? Sure, I will give you that. In all honesty it is much more complicated than that. But sure, let us say he meant cut. What he said isn't wrong. I will post you links on that. Here is your problem, you are not thinking critically. I am not saying Shapiro is correct. I am not saying that I completely agree with Shapiro. What I am saying is that he is a critical thinker and has legit points. And if you want to counter his arguments you have to understand his position and give a rebuttal with critical thought. You fail at doing that. You just reach for talking points that are easily torn apart. You scream "he wants to cut social security" without understanding the full picture. You scream "he supports money in politics" when you never address his side fairly. This is why Shapiro is growing and someone like Kyle has a dying channel.
    5
  2. Remove the 1st amendment then. The internet did not exist at that time so it was outdated.
    4
  3. Zidneya, the next step is a ban. We have background checks already.
    3
  4. Do we live in the age of Minority Report now?
    3
  5. " Wow. How does that Shapiro dick taste? " Couldn't say, but now I see you are going down the path of immaturity. Each point 1. No it isn't. The issue of socialism is a different discussion. The fact is we have not had a free market system in over 50 years. You talk about prior to Obamacare, I am saying you need to look at the past 50+ years. You very much can compare healthcare to furniture as in the end it is a commodity that someone has to provide and you have to motivate people to work in it. Without workers in healthcare you are limited in choice and thus prices go up. You clearly did not watch the video I linked to it. If so you would have countered it based on what he said, but you didn't. Why is LASIK cheaper and better where healthcare has become more expensive? Again, we do not have a free market system. All Obamacare did was add more government. 2. Again, I cannot comment on Israel 3. So is it corrupt when Bernie receives money and free air time from TYT? Also, I do not support corruption. I feel that ending corruption can be done by limiting the power of the government. I find it ironic how you complain about a corrupt federal government but then want to give that same government power to control you healthcare. 4. When has he ever said taxation is theft? Also, what "social contract"? Where is this contract? And saying "help the public" is very vague. One can argue having less government intrusion is a way to help the public. Lower taxes, more economic freedom and less government bureaucracy leads to that. As for Kyle's station, he is losing views. You are talking about total subscriptions where people hardly unsubscribe, they just stop watching. I will link you the views later. "If Kyle's channel was dying, we wouldnt see this progressive wave uprising in the US. " What uprising? Democrats lost. Bernie lost. He got destroyed in the debates against Cruz. Trump's approval rating is going up and the economy is growing. " The only reason why Shapiro is as big as he is, is because he attacks leftwing sjws so much." He has multiple books and has spoken in front of congress. "His breed of condescending conservative is dying because the average American is tired of them fighting for the elites and not them. " But yet republicans won. And his show at Daily Wire is growing.
    3
  6. We have background checks and magazine limits don't work. Magazines are designed for quick reloading. Look at the VA Tech shooter and the magazines he had, he killed around 30 people.
    3
  7. We have strict background checks. Unless you create a gun registry there is nothing else you can do. Why not have 30 10 round magazines? Again, the VA Tech shooter killed more people than this shooter did with 10 round magazines.
    3
  8. I like how people rip on Shapiro but can never explain how he is wrong?
    2
  9. When put up to a vote background check expansion failed to pass in Maine and passed in NV by only 0.45%.
    2
  10. 80% said not in Colorado.
    1
  11. Now you open the door for oppression. The idea was that the people having guns allows for them to revolt against the government if needed, and for self defense so we do not have to rely on the government.
    1
  12. So I ask again, what is wrong with what he says?
    1
  13. When put up to a vote in Maine expanded background checks failed to pass and in NV it passed by only 0.45% mainly because Clark County accounts for 3/4 of the state's population and is pretty liberal. I question these polls.
    1
  14. Ok, what gun reform? Really, what does Kyle suggest we do? What would have stopped this shooting? There is a reason why gun control only comes up during these shooting. It is because the gun control issue is a losing battle as no new gun law would have stopped this besides a gun ban.
    1