Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Amazon Shamed Into Paying $15 An Hour By Bernie u0026 Ro Khanna" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Libtard3354, to start, when you say the 1% make more than the bottom 50%, that is not true. The top 10% earned 40% of the income. If you are talking about wealth then there is some truth there, but wealth is not income. Wealth is assets. If you want to have a discussion you have to get facts correct.
Under Obama unemployment was decreasing but so was labor participation. Under Trump labor participation is no longer decreasing but unemployment is still decreasing. More people are looking for jobs but unemployment is still going down.
GDP is a great indicator in how well the economy is doing.
It is arguable that wages have not stagnated. What method are you using to determine that? CPI? PCE? Boskin Commission adjusted inflation?
Walmart has paid above the min. wage for years. Why attack them?
You can scream bubble all you want, it isn't happening. The Fed raised interest rates 3 times this year. In the past major recessions happened due to low interest rates.
I pointed to an approval rating poll for Trump to show how people cherry pick polls. As a whole I don't follow the polls as they are vague questions on complex issues to people who are not informed on the topic. Opinions change when more information is given. People point to Bernie being popular but he has never been attacked by the GOP so any poll on that is irrelevant. People still know very little about him such as him supporting Castro, him stealing electricity from his neighbor, his support for breadlines, or how he wants to raise taxes on everyone and so on.
As for Bernie backed candidates in the rust belt, they won districts they have no chance of winning in the general. And the candidates they really rallied for, like that one in KS, lost.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1