Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Ben Shapiro: Protesting Workers Are As Bad As Price Gougers" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@comingviking the owners risk a lot. Even if the company operates at a loss the workers still get paid. Even considered that? As for QE, that was money to keep banks afloat. It wasn't just pumped into the economy.
"Workers would invest in their livelyhood, the Corporation. IF they were running Things. "
Would they? Many of the Amazon workers did not even invest in themselves. Many, at most, possess a GED. What makes you think these workers will be able to understand supply chain management, marketing, tax laws, etc.
As for the Spain company, you are looking at one case. There are cases where worker coop can work, but that does not mean it will work in every company. For example, In and Out Burger is successful by having a limited menu and limited locations. Does that mean every restaurant should follow suit?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@comingviking pee in the bottle? Really? I heard all these so call horror stories from Amazon, they seem so few and far between. I don't buy them.
So you are saying that the workers should dictate their pay? What is going to stop them from just raising their wages to an expensive level? Again, these workers don't understand supply chain management, tax law, marketing, etc. They do not know how a business functions and nor do they care. So why give them a voice? As I said, these were the same workers who argued over what music to play.
Recessions happen. Only around three times in this nation, since the 1900, have we seen major recessions. They were the great depression, the hyper inflation during the 70s, and 2008. Each time it was the Federal Reserve that caused those recessions. All throughout history, though, hands off government has led to faster recovery. And what crisis? Things are better than ever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@comingviking and once again it comes back to the issue that the regular worker does not understand what makes a company successful. Someone working as a picker in the warehouse with only a GED will not understand accounting, payroll, tax laws, etc. And people will just end up voting what benefits them as opposed to the company out of greed and ignorance. That is why you need a manager to actually control these things as they are the ones who knows what is going on. Also, if you place complex decision making in the hands of the workers investors won't trust that and they won't invest causing stock prices to drop and thus the company will have to down size.
Not to be rude but you do not seem to understand the complexity of managing and running a company. You don't seem to understand how ignorant a lot of people are and how they do not understand the complexity of running a business. An argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter. Fact is people understand very little. You shown it yourself when you said Bezos pays himself billions when in reality he does not even pay himself six figures.
You also have another major flaw, you say you will have workers with different jobs. Who decides that? Are people going to just pick what they want to do? I see that as becoming a mess. You see, eventually you need a leader saying "you do this, you do this, now go". What you are pushing for is mass chaos.
As for bankrupting now, Amazon seems very successful. I do not see it bankrupting anytime soon.
Also, I do not support oppression of any kind. Who is being oppressed in my system?
1
-
@comingviking you brought up one that employs engineers and computer programmers, intelligent and skilled workers. You can't compare that Amazon who hires people with GED. I never said worker controlled enterprises cannot work. I am saying they won't work everywhere. Again, you yourself displayed ignorance when you said that Bezos decided to pay himself 100 billion dollars when he does not. He pays himself $80,000 a year. But again, you can't compare a company that hires skilled workers to that of a company that hires unskilled workers. You also can't make broad generalization in that if it works in one company it can surely work in another. Again, as I said earlier, In and Out Burger has success by having limited locations and a limited menu. Should every restaurant follow suit? Should there be no places to serve chicken, pasta, tacos, etc. because of In and Out's success? No, because the market is diverse. So again, I never once said worker coop will not work. I acknowledge it will in some cases, but not all as you claim.
Also, who is oppressing people here? I do not see it. Are the executives of Amazon holding guns to people's heads forcing them to work? No. Thus, no one is being oppressed.
1
-
@comingviking he has that much wealth, but wealth does not equal income. Most of his wealth are in shares of his company where he is the largest shareholder. He can't just liquidated it as doing so in a frivolous way means his company is not a wise investment as Bezos will just waste funds. Also, him being the largest share holder shows investors that he is willing to stand by his product which is his company. Thus the price goes up of his shares. Him owning those shares increases the value.
Compare it to this. Say you were to give a responsible person a home and an irresponsible person the same exact home. In the long run what will you place bets on whose home is better? The responsible one. Same with Bezos owning so many shares. But he can't just liquidated them unless it is in a way that, for the most part, investors improve on. So no, he does not have all this money.
And yes, for the most part unskilled workers are not capable of making informed decisions on complex issues. A programmer spent years in schooling learning how to solve problems, thus they can figure out complex issues much more easier than someone who works simply picking items off of a shelf and placing it in a bin. Also, fun note, a lot of CEOs are engineers. Bezos has an engineering degree for example.
You used your example and again, I worked in Amazon warehouse. They argued over what type of music to play. That was their concern. That is where you need management to come in and simply say "this is what will be played or nothing at all". You also avoided the point on who will decide what job to do? In Amazon warehouse you have different task, picker, crissplant where you chute, sort, you have the fork lift drivers, etc. Being a fork lift driver requires more safety regulations. They never allowed temps to do that. But what if someone wants to do it? Who will be the one who tells them no? That is where a manager comes in.
I don't have a disdain for ordinary people. In fact, my understanding of ordinary people is why I feel the way I do. I understand that these hourly workers do not care. All they care about is working, collecting their check, going home to fuck their spouse and drink beer. They are not like a manager who thinks 4 or 5 steps ahead. As with my conversation with my department chair, hourly workers are not as dedicated as salary workers. I used to think that people were dedicate to their job but found out they aren't. A manager will spend hours, even after work figuring things out. How many of those Amazon employees are willing to take their work home with them? Essentially none. So they should not be making decisions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joemoe974 you labor is not inherently worth anything. In reality it is worth nothing until an employer hires you. If you don''t like how much you are getting paid than find a new job. You are making it sound like that one's labor has some already determined value when it doesn't. It is only worth as much as an employer is willing to pay. No different than when you buy an item from the store, you felt like it is worth however much you spent on it. There is one difference, though. If the employer operates at a loss for a week it will still have to pay the employee.
As far as saying "one for you 10 for me", it is much more complex than that. Many companies operate at thin profit margins. For example, fast food joints operate around 5% profit margins or less.
As for min. wage law, you are enforcing how much is paid per hour, not per week. If you raise the min. wage and a company cuts hours, what was accomplished? Also, Amazon already pays well above the min. wage. As for the employee giving the owner labor, yes, at a cost call a wage. Again, your labor is not inherently worth something until someone values it.
1