Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Trump 2020 Campaign Fundraises Off Banning CNN's 'Fake News' Jim Acosta" video.

  1. This wasn't a crack down on free speech. Acosta can still say what he wants on CNN. He does not have a right to the white house.
    7
  2. andyrihn1, if the President is going to limit access they have that right. And the press has the right to call them out on it and criticize.
    3
  3. andyrihn1, freedom of press is being able to print what you want without fear of repercussions. You don't have the right to the white house. You do have the right to print criticism of him though.
    2
  4. Ryne Green, there is a difference. Shapiro is looking to give a speech. Acosta is looking to ask questions.
    2
  5. Marcus Smith, you can revoke everyone's press pass and it would be legal. With that the media can use free speech to criticize him. Their speech will not be denied. Trump does not have to answer any questions. What if Trump allowed everyone in but only answered with "Google It"?
    2
  6. Space Wizard, I agree, but many here call me a troll simply because I post a counter argument. I am looking to engage in an intelligent conversation.
    2
  7. andyrihn1, not true. Trump does not have to answer any questions. He does not have to give press conferences.
    2
  8. andyrihn1, care to give met that court case so I can read it?
    2
  9. Jaybird J, there is a difference is that Trump does not have to answer. So if Acosta asked a question and Trump refuses to answer, what is the point? Shapiro wants to give a speech to which people don't have to show up to.
    1
  10. Definition of a troll=Someone who disagrees with me.
    1
  11. Brian, you are correct. But people have no right to the white house. People can criticize Trump all they want, nothing is stopping them.
    1
  12. C Wilson, I want Trump to answer questions and have people ask them. Where did I say I didn't? I am just saying he does not have to if he doesn't. That doesn't mean I agree.
    1