Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Chamber Of Commerce Vows To Fight Medicare For All" video.

  1. You don't have a right to their services. Those workers don't have to serve you.
    2
  2. Also, with the exception of TSA agents, those workers are funded locally, not federally. And they are a drop in the bucket in terms of cost. So you argument is weak.
    2
  3. M4A will cause payroll taxes to go up adding more costs for businesses.
    1
  4. If government is going to pick up the tab it will want to run the system. Not doing so will lead to much higher prices.
    1
  5.  @bohemianwriter1  , the government does not have the right to grab you without due process.
    1
  6. Not true
    1
  7. Really? Kyle lies all the time when it comes to healthcare.
    1
  8. Medicare for all will be paid for by an increase in the payroll tax causing more paper work for them.
    1
  9. There are plenty of sources to back up his argument.
    1
  10.  @Vorox1027   https://www.hoover.org/research/excellent-health-setting-record-straight-americas-health-care Here is an entire book on it for starters.
    1
  11.  @Vorox1027  , I can provide more if you want.
    1
  12.  @a_can_of_soda  , that isn't what the study says.
    1
  13.  @fgsaramago  , the OP said this "while they have nothing to back up their argument after american privatized healthcare hilariously failed and was proven inferior to single payer" But yet I can point to an entire book written by a Stanford professor that gives evidence. "Economics of scale"? Really? With on entity you have what is called a monopoly. With multiple companies you have competition where the price drops and quality improves. Look at the Community Mental Health Act of 1963 and how the federal government failed in that one.
    1
  14.  @jbeihl1  , studies don't say that unless they make vague assumptions.
    1
  15.  Justin Griffith  , the university I work for pays me. My funding is from the state.
    1