Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Fossil Fuel Funded Anti-EPA Crusader Approved To Head The EPA" video.

  1. Before the EPA air quality was improving. There is no reason to have the EPA.
    1
  2. MrPowertorque, and if I were to die today the world will continue to improve. I understand that. But people feel that if we get rid of the EPA that all of a sudden the air and water will become polluted and the US will become a wasteland which is not true at all. But I love how you have no rebuttal.
    1
  3. Daniel, that is not an argument. I actually have strong critical thinking skills. Tell me why do we need the EPA.
    1
  4. sluggdiddy, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/01/a-report-card-for-humanity-1900-2050/282928/ Also, if you want to just look at one city than I can say this. In Iowa they had one of their coldest winters on record. So does that mean global warming is not happening? http://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html Life expectancy was going up just fine before the EPA.
    1
  5. Forum for Democracy, I agree. But someone was telling me to look at one city in the past as a comparison for the entire country.
    1
  6. Before the EPA air quality was already improving. People like clean air, they just hate frivolous government waste and barriers.
    1
  7. I love this. We need to remove the EPA. Before the EPA air quality was improving already. All the EPA does is add layers of bureaucracy and government waste while hindering economic growth.
    1
  8. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/01/a-report-card-for-humanity-1900-2050/282928/
    1