Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "EPA Chief Denies Carbon Dioxide, Climate Change Link" video.

  1. The issues with climate change are 1. How much is man playing a role 2. is it even bad No where in any scientific literature will you find a definitive answer to those two questions.
    2
  2. Hazzycakes, that first link does not reference any peer review study and does not give anything that suggests that humans are a major factor. Climate change has been happening for over 4 billion years. Are humans playing a role? Yes. But by how much? That first article does not give a quantitative value at all. All it says is humans are playing a role which Pruitt said we were. On the next link, climate change has been happening for billions of years and the ecosystem evolved. Or do you not support the theory of evolution? Everything mentioned in that NASA article has happened before. I don't see how that is bad. You are not showing me definitive answers.
    2
  3. Decl Matte, read the book "Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming". Those peer reviewed papers do not make the claim you are making. The reality is that climate science is a field that involves many disciplines and as a result we cannot say, with high certainty, how much man is playing a role in climate change or is it even bad. "Whole anti-climate change crowd literally wants to protect their interests.." To you "anti-climate change" is someone who realizes that climate change is happening but is skeptical about the conclusion made by the media and politicians. If anyone wants to protect their interest it is the people who are extremist on the issues.
    2
  4. Where in this video did Pruitt deny climate change?
    1
  5. We have known, at best, since the late 1800s. Stop trying to be deceptive here. We did not know the properties of electromagnetic radiation until the 1880s.
    1
  6. Mark, nice find. I will read it. At the same time it still does not show how Pruitt is wrong.
    1
  7. Also, I have a paper published in RSC
    1
  8. Scientists are not hiding data. The reality is that they are not saying what politicians are saying. If people were to listen to scientists and not politicians they will support Pruitt in this case.
    1
  9. So the issue is on climate change and two minutes in the video Kyle talks about flat earth and the economic crash? I feel like he is losing it.
    1
  10. It isn't about deny it. It is questioning how much of a role it is playing. The question that was asked to Pruitt was a loaded, and asinine question. Science does not prove anything, and Pruitt's response was great. Kyle's response here is pure projection. It is clear he never read a science book in his life.
    1
  11. Kyle has a political science degree. I have a degree in physics, a degree in chemistry and I am a doctorate candidate. Kyle is an idiot on this topic.
    1
  12. Scientists are not warning anyone as no scientist is making the conclusion politicians on the left or Kyle are making.
    1
  13. "Actual scientists have been warning us for decades." Ok, name them, list their publications and cite them.
    1
  14. I see you get angered easily. That is a sign of low intelligence. But again, I ask you, name the scientists, quote their publications and cite them.
    1
  15. TylerIsCoolBro, what you said is great. The left has become so extreme on climate change that it deters any type of progress at all. The vast majority of people support a clean earth and progress in that regards. Problem is that the left create mass hysteria on the issue and feel the federal government is needed to solve the problem. That pushes people away and hurts progress. There are many examples on the right of people doing progressive things when it comes to the environment and energy. George Bush's home in comparison to Al Gore's home is a great example. The ultra left needs to calm down a bit on the issue.
    1