General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

whyamimrpink78
Secular Talk
comments

Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Ben Shapiro Vs Tucker Carlson | Capitalism u0026 Populism" video.

He wasn't debating anyone that year.
16
Has a law degree, graduated top of his class, skipped two grades, wrote several books, debated congress. He is very intelligent. You may disagree with him but he is intelligent.
9
He never uses religion to push for legal policies.
6
@mudslinger888 , why doesn't Kyle go on Ben's Sunday show?
5
@tonedowne , the private sector is fully capable of handling healthcare. The problem is that we don't have a free market system in healthcare. We have a heavily regulated system with subsidizes. The biggest problem is how insurance has become healthcare. Compare to car insurance. Despite being mandated in every state car insurance is affordable. Why? Because car insurance covers unplanned, expensive situations like an accident. It does not cover oil changes or new headlights even though they are needed for a safe and reliable car. The reason is because those are cases you can plan for and shop around for. Healthcare insurance should be the same way. If healthcare insurance only covered unplanned, expensive cases than the price will drop. Many cases can be paid for out of pocket where people can shop around where the price will drop as well. Case in point. LASIK eye surgery. Over time the price has dropped and the quality has improve where LASIK is not covered by insurance but paid for out of pocket. A reason why healthcare insurance is healthcare, in my opinion, is because of the payroll tax. Because of that businesses pay employees with healthcare insurance as opposed to a higher wage. Thus healthcare insurance is a form of payment and thus has become healthcare. That is a problem. Instead of people shopping around for their own plans and having insurance be insurance, it is a form of payment and thus has become healthcare. That gives insurance companies too much power. If we had a free market system in healthcare than insurance companies will have to compete and will become insurance companies and healthcare prices will drop and quality will improve.
4
@quiensera9947 , Kyle Kullinski and Sam Seder should not be on that list. They are not smart.
4
@beaverones41 , religion is about faith. It doesn't require evidence as there is no evidence for a god and there is no evidence that gods do not exist. You are going down the realm of philosophy here. Many people use a lot to justify their morals. Religion is one of it.
3
@morenitomoreno1282 , he has no problem debating people. It was a midterm election time so he was focused on that.
3
@MrVedude , I can beat Kyle in a debate. He says the same handful of talking points over and over again that are easy to debunk.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS , no he won't. On healthcare I have way more resources than he can dream of. He will say a talking point and I will counter with an in depth counter argument citing studies and books.
2
@iller3 , why? Kyle won't watch it. There have been videos made showing how ignorant Kyle is and he never responds.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS , I post plenty of sources, especially on healthcare.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS , no one cares about Kyle's videos as well. Look at how many views he gets.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS , I don't make videos.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS , gaining subs does not mean gaining views. Many people sub and don't watch and simply go away.
2
@THEMOTHERFLICKERS ,his views are also dropping.
2
@tonedowne , that isn't how insurance works. Insurance is supposed to be there for unplanned, expensive cases where demand is inelastic. Just like in car insurance it covers for a car accident, but does not cover oil changes and new headlights. The issue with our healthcare system is that healthcare insurance has become healthcare to where it is no longer insurance but a piggy bank. Healthcare is very much like buying shoes. In many cases you can pay for it out of pocket and should as that will drive down prices. For unplanned, expensive cases insurance can handle that where people should be able to search for their own plans. But to say that insurance is people paying for other people's healthcare is not how insurance should be ran and is a reason why healthcare costs are so high. You have unhealthy people refusing to get insurance until they get sick.
2
@ILive4saturdays , Shapiro gets his fame elsewhere as in his books and speeches. His youtube channel is simply a side project. So you really can't compare just youtube views. If Kyle had other projects that will be one thing but he doesn't.
2
@bobkalle5662 , the political left bases all of their ideas on emotions which are subjective. Shapiro does use a lot of facts. There is a time to use morals but in comparison to the political left he uses more facts.
2
@beaverones41 , I have no problem with people having faith. What is wrong with it? You can believe what you want and if it makes you feel good than why should I complain? Just don't pass laws based on it. Where is your evidence that gods do not exist? You have none. It goes both ways. One can provide evidence for god does exist by saying life is why they exist. As a whole I don't get involved in the religious debate. It is stupid and unproductive. As long as you don't pass laws based on it than I am fine. Shapiro doesn't so I have no problem with it. I understand why people have faith. No different than why I love football and others don't, or why some people fall in love with someone and others don't. It is subjective. Also, don't make the science and religion comparison. They are completely different. Science is a culture of doubt, religion is a culture of faith. They can co-exist.
2
@AngryGPT , with the death penalty that person did something wrong and went through the due process to receive the death penalty. The fetus has not done anything. There is the logic in that.
2
He is smart. Those who say he isn't has no argument against him, Kyle especially. Shapiro is very smart. You may disagree with what he says but he is very smart.
2
@morenitomoreno1282 , he invites everyone.
2
@therealist499 , Ben has written best selling books and has appeared on MSM and in front of congress at one point. So I feel he is entitled to challenge AOC. What has Kyle done? Has he debated in front of congress? How many best selling books has he written? All Kyle does is run his little youtube show and even though it has been around for 10 years he only has 623,000 subscribers. Compare that to someone like Steven Crowder who has been around the same amount of time. The issue is that Kyle runs a show that caters to far left thinkers who essentially live in an echo chamber. Read the comments about Shapiro here and listen to what Kyle says. They have no legit criticisms towards Shapiro. They just mock what he says and call his arguments stupid. The fact is that Shapiro debating Kyle would be a waste of time. Kyle's fans have no desire to listen to the other side so Shapiro is not going to reach out to them. When he gives speeches on college campuses he is reaching out to people who are independents and open minded. In a debate against AOC people who are independent will watch that and Shapiro can convince them of new ideas. Kyle's fans have no desire to learn or understand the other position, so what does Shapiro have to gain?
2
@andrewb6647 , Kyle just copied Bernie's plan of giving away free shit. With that he has no details in how to implement those policies. Look at AOC, when pressed she does not explain how to pay for her plans nor gives specifics in how they will be implemented. When she was pushed in the recent 60 min. interview she literally said feelings over facts. It is not impressive to create a group that just goes off of appeal to emotions talking points. Anyone can do that. I need specifics and Kyle has not given any. I have not seen any specifics in how to implement these plans from JD. Seven is not impressive especially considering the incumbents who where already there and the ones who ran against no one. And again, if AOC is your golden child, you are in trouble. I would watch a debate between Kyle and Ben even though I know how Kyle would act. Kyle will just spew his same handful of talking points. To be honest I can beat Kyle in a debate easily. He says the same handful of talking points over and over again and I know how to counter them. Healthcare is one area I know I can destroy Kyle in simply by how little he knows on the issue. As for him wanting to debate in Politicon, Ben was not debating and from what I can tell Kyle is making things up. Where is the proof that he reached out to Politicon to debate these people ? Jesse Lee Peterson said he was not contacted. The only evidence Kyle gave were text messages. No emails and no real evidence beyond that. Who contacts via text messages like that? I would expect emails. I feel like Kyle is realizing he is losing. The vast majority of his candidates in JD lost and the ones that won were incumbents or people like AOC who are a joke. He has had his show for 10 years and he gets only around 40,000 views a video. And when he tried to debate someone people did not know who he is. He is irrelevant and he knows it which is why he is now looking to debate people. Maybe if he did not work out of a echo chamber he would have more intelligence and be more relevant.
2
@andrewb6647 , let me ask you this, why won't Kyle debate me? I reached out to him via twitter and he did not respond. Why won't he debate me?
2
Did you have a counter argument to his point? Or are you just going to mock it?
1
@Iliketoeatallday , he doesn't. He hardly knows who Kyle is.
1
@iller3 , how am I chicken?
1
@isasooner5 , Kyle repeats the same things over and over again. He has no substance to his arguments.
1
@isasooner5 , Kyle refused to debate Ben for years. And he has no criticisms towards Ben, only insults. Also, Ben has way more fame than Kyle. How about Kyle writes a book or speaks in front of a crowd.
1
@knavishknight , I have challenged Kyle to a debate, he did not respond. He is a coward.
1
@isasooner5 , Ben was not debating anyone at politicon. Also, Ben allows people to challenge him at speeches which means he is not redundant. He has to get into details on his points. Kyle is redundant. He repeats the same thing over and over again in his echo chamber.
1
@tonedowne , never said I want unregulated healthcare. I feel the states should regulated it. Owning a car is not optional for most people. Also, the comparison to car insurance and healthcare is legit. If healthcare insurance covered only unplanned, expensive cases than the price will drop. Problem is that healthcare insurance covers all of healthcare. At that point it is not insurance but instead a piggy bank. There is a desire to have insurance to pay for unplanned, expensive things. But most of healthcare can be paid for out of pocket. Why do I need to have my insurance pay for my routine check ups every year? I can pay for that out of pocket. In comparison to car insurance if you crash your car than yes, your insurance goes up. If you, as a person, don't live a healthy life than you healthcare expenses overall go up. That is on you. But if someone else hits your car your insurance does not go up. Same with healthcare if you get into an accident that is not your fault than you insurance will not go up if insurance covered only unplanned, expensive cases. If it did than people won't buy that insurance and they lose money. A lot points to a free market system working much better with healthcare.
1
@tonedowne , people are born with many strengths and shortcomings. Some people are born to be 6'5" and run a 4.5 sec forty to where they can earn millions playing professional sports. Others aren't. Do we place limits on that? No. Same is with healthcare. Some people are born with genetic heart disease. In a free market healthcare insurance will over look that because if they don't than people won't buy their product. One can also look towards charities for help or maybe that is something the local government can step in and help with. But as a whole the idea of someone being born a certain way is not a strong argument against a free market system because you can use that for anything. Even at that lifetime care is something the person will have to budget in. It is a fair point to say that car insurance does have the luxury of the government denying people to drive. But in the end it is mandated for those who have to drive and prices are still low. Why? Because it covers unplanned, expensive cases. Healthcare insurance should be the same way. Preventative care is dependent on the individual. We are taught about eating healthy in school. If they don't follow that than that is their fault. You are now blaming society for individual's actions. If I drive drunk and lose my license should I blame society? How far do you want to go with this? If a private system only treated symptoms than it won't get any customers. That is similar to a restaurant letting customers smell the food but not feeding them, no one will go there. People die in nations with single payer systems. Reality is that resources are limited, no system covers everyone. A free market system, in my opinion, covers the most with the highest quality.
1
@bobkalle5662 , when you break it down the political left bases their ideas on emotions where the political right bases their ideas on facts and logic.
1
@DuragAllDay , I don't have evidence. Maybe you did create the universe? I, as a scientist, don't try to answer that question so I don't care.
1
@MrNext014 , I worked for Amazon a few years ago. I am getting my PhD in physical chemistry.
1
@MrNext014 , these comments don't take long to write. Also, Kyle's fans are the bottom of the barrel in terms of intelligence, it doesn't take long to debunk them or Kyle.
1
@TheEpic22 What? Way to strawman.
1
@Username-ei4ff , I have watched him. He doesn't use religion to justify policies. How about you point to me when he does.
1
@Black Star , when you go to the extreme the left plays the emotion card. Look at the likes of Bernie Sanders and AOC, they represent the far left. When pushed on the issue Bernie says appeal to emotion rhetoric of people being poor, and how we need to push a " living wage", or people losing healthcare, etc. No real substance in that argument. Look at the min. wage argument. When pushed the far left ends up bringing up situations of a single mom working a min. wage job and is poor. In reality that represents a very minute portion of the overall min. wage worker. Another example is healthcare. When pushed the far left brings up cases of people dying due to lack of healthcare even though that happens in all nations. That is not to say that emotions are not important. We are human and we have emotions. But when pushed the far left bases their ideas on emotions. Saying people die due to lack of healthcare does not change that fact that resources are limited. Someone is going to end up behind. Saying that a single mom works full time on min. wage does not change the fact that businesses can't afford higher wages.
1
@Black Star , I can give more examples but the reality is that at the core the left bases their ideas on emotions and the right bases their ideas on facts and reasoning. That mainly deals with economic issues. Social issues are typically more subjective. Healthcare is a great example. The far left, when pushed on the issue, brings up the point of people dying or going bankrupt due to healthcare. On the right the facts are that people die in every nation due to lack of healthcare because, in the end, resources are limited. That is a fact. The government doesn't have some magic wand to make thing appear.
1
@Black Star , I am a moderate. I understand both sides of the issues and if you were to push me on the issues you will see that I actually support many left wing ideas. The issue is that on this channel the people are so far left that a moderate sounds like a "right winger" to them. People are so far left that they dismiss any right leaning thoughts no matter what evidence is given to them. I have posted many studies and books, especially those related to healthcare (I find the issue interesting) and people here deny it. I post entire books showing that I have read up on this issue. Now that doesn't make me right nor does it make me an expert. But when people here deny those opinion and the information in those books and studies, it is an issue.
1
@anythingbutme6602 , he views abortion as murder. Plenty of atheists agree murder should be illegal. You don't need faith for that.
1
@TheEpic22 , there is little evidence to suggest that it is cheaper. The left fudge the numbers to make that point. People die in every nation and how they die is complex. Many point to the 45,000 number in the US when one cannot honestly say that even if they have access to healthcare if they would have lived. You made an emotional argument right now by saying phrases such as "logical sense". It isn't "logical sense" when there is a debate to begin with. You also made an emotional argument by bringing up corporate lobbying. People have different opinions due to many facts and ideas, not because of lobbying.
1
@TheEpic22 , because you do fudge the numbers. I have read the studies and there are large assumptions being made with no specifics in them if they do say Medicare for all is cheaper. "Logical sense" is an emotional argument. You are saying that if one disagrees with your position they have not logic. In reality these issues are highly debatable. It is no different than saying "common sense". There are many things our system does well, read the following book https://www.hoover.org/research/excellent-health-setting-record-straight-americas-health-care Plenty of facts in that book.
1
@TheEpic22 , there are many reasons to disagree with Medicare for all. I just cited an entire book on the issue of healthcare. Here is an opinion by an expert http://keithhennessey.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Kate-Baicker.pdf Do those experts defy logic? Me saying I read a book is not an emotional argument. I am saying that there are experts that disagree with your ideas. That is a fact. They have facts on their side.
1
@anythingbutme6602 , abortion is killing a living thing that can become a human being. What is your take on murder?
1
@anythingbutme6602 , sperm are not living things in relation to a human because they lack the correct numbers of chromosomes. So that is that argument as well.
1
It isn't. Kyle hides behind a computer screen. He refuses to take him head on.
1
Not really. Sorry you are not smart enough to listen. I love how people mock Shapiro but never counter what he says.
1
@Ben Krueger , how about you point to one point. Also, with how the left is these days with them being radical and out of touch with the common man, they are easy to debate.
1
@Ben Krueger , take this entire video by Kyle. He just called Shapiro stupid and said we are corrupt. Ok, if our politicians are corrupt than why does he want to expand the federal government and give it more power? Kyle earlier in the video: "We need government regulations to prevent workers from being exploited." Kyle later: "The government is corrupt." Never mind that a lot of the "facts" that Kyle says are very deceptive. The political left is extreme right now.
1
@rameelahmed4407 , they are radical.
1
@rameelahmed4407 , they want to completely transform our economy as we know it and have not thought about it at all. Here is a small example. In "tuition free college" how do you account for the NCAA?
1
@rameelahmed4407 , money in politics will always exist. It has been an issue ever since government as been around. The solution is to reduce the powers government has.
1
@Ben Krueger , he has a point on those nations. They are small nations with limited diversity. Read the book "Debunking Utopia". Those nations are strong simply due to their small populations and limited culture. We have states with a larger population than those nations. Money has been in politics ever since government has existed. You think you have a novel solution by wanting to get money out of politics but you don't. The best solution is to reduce the powers government has, period. Money is speech in many ways. Some people donate money to support a politician, some dedicate an entire youtube channel to them.
1
@Ben Krueger , population size does matter. A larger population means a more diverse population and different cultures. Simply compare Utah to Nevada, two neighboring states with vast differences. Different cultures means different lifestyles, economies, beliefs, etc.
1
@Ben Krueger , money is speech. Unless there is quid pro quo than it is not illegal. People have many ways to support a candidate. One is that they can attend rallies, another is that they can post signs, one is dedicating an entire youtube channel to them, one is donating money to them so that candidate can use that money to travel and buy advertising time. That is why money is speech. I didn't dismiss your argument, you just can't accept the one I gave you. What is the difference between Kyle giving free air time to advertise Bernie Sanders or Kyle giving Bernie money so that Bernie can pay for a commercial? Nothing in the big picture. If you watch Kyle has said constantly that the media gave Trump X amount of dollars of free air time. So if money isn't speech than why does he bring up that dollar value? Also, money in politics has always existed. The best solution is to limit the size of the government to prevent it from becoming the master. We want government to serve us and we do that by keeping it as local as possible and limiting its power. In smaller nations mixed economies can work due to less diversity. People have different beliefs and life styles. The larger the population the greater the diversity. Compare TX to Minnesota. They are completely different states with different people. When I was in TX a lot was written in spanish due to the large Hispanic population there. It was December and 70 degrees. When I went to MN a week later there was nothing written in spanish and it was -20 degrees there. People acted differently. There is value in having money spent by government, but people have to see if they are getting their money's worth. A lot of that is subjective. To ensure people are getting their money's worth you keep government as local as possible. There is a subjective side in how money should be spent. What you feel is money well spent can be viewed as a waste to others. That is what makes this challenging. Watch this video on that topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQLBitV69Cc&t=22s
1
@rameelahmed4407 , population does matter. A larger population means more diversity. You can't have a one size fits all policy that works.
1
@Ben Krueger , if the government has limited powers than it can't be bought. That is the issue. You want to give more powers to the government to where it has more to sell to the highest bidder. I want to give less power. Compare it to this. Say a woman is in an abusive relationship. What should she do? Leave the man. What she shouldn't do is marry the man and have a kid. You want to do the similar thing with government. You want to give it more power to it can become corrupt even more with no checks and limits. I want to limit the powers government has so it can't be sold. You can say that some people have a larger voice due to them having more money and that is true. But someone like Kyle has a larger voice than me due to him having his own show. Should we limit how much air time Kyle has? To make government accountable you limit the powers it has and push for more local government. The more local government is the more it will serve the people. You are talking about Bernie and Nancy when in reality I have no power over either. Why? Because I can't vote for either one. So why should they have a strong influence in my life to begin with when I can't even vote for them?
1
@Ben Krueger , my analogy is spot on. You complain about a corrupt government but feel that giving it more power and electing the "right people" will solve everything, because apparently that will be the one time government won't abuse its power or become corrupt. Just like marrying the abusive spouse will somehow change their ways. When will you learn not to trust government?
1
@Ben Krueger , saying "elect the right people" is not an argument. Look who is president now
1
@Ben Krueger , all a corporation can do is offer you a job and/or a product. For as bad as a company like Walmart may be I have never seen them hold a gun to someone's head and force them to do things. I have seen government do that. Corporations have no power, government does. That is why they have to buy it from politicians. Who are these "right people"? You do know that politicians have been taking brides since government has existed? It is a battle you won't win. The best solution is to limit the powers of government. Public finance campaigns are worse. Established politicians will see that only the people they like get money. Look at what happened to Bernie when he ran and how the democrats treated him? Public finance campaign is giving more power to government to where established politicians win.
1
@Ben Krueger , also, it is about finding a balance. While you are scared of big corporations I am skeptical of big government. That is why I want limits on it.
1
@rameelahmed4407 , what makes right wing policies a fantasy?
1
@rameelahmed4407 , money is speech, that is the reality.
1
@rameelahmed4407 , money is the same as speech. You need money to pay for advertising.
1
@rameelahmed4407 , people have complained about money in politics for years. It is not going to change. The best solution is to limit the powers the federal government has to it has nothing to sell.
1
@DuragAllDay , not really a rebuttal.
1
@GabbertEvergreen , if I say dumb shit than why hasn't anyone debunked me yet?
1
@GabbertEvergreen , set up a debate between Kyle and myself on the issue of healthcare and i will. I come here to educate Kyle's fans. So how about you set up a debate on healthcare between Kyle and myself. I would love to put Kyle in front of his place in front of his fans.
1
@RurouniLeonardo360 , Kyle never admits he is wrong.
1
Shapiro is very open minded. That is why he is willing to have discussions with people. Kyle is as close minded as it gets. That is why he works in an echo chamber.
1
@PurushaDesa , it was more of a discussion. Also, in his debate with Razorfist and in that group he was in when you watch Kyle he constantly makes faces in an immature way. Kyle has spent years in an echo chamber and it has held him back.
1
@StevieDamnit , the point of debates is to have ideas challenged and allow people to defend their ideas so that an audience can decide on which ideas are the best. When done correctly debates are the highest form of political discourse. Shapiro, when he debates, does it in front of an audience where a lot of independents. Thus he will change their mind or get them to think about right wing ideas and how they are positive. Kyle and his fans completely dismiss right wing ideas all together to the point you can literally shove them information in front of their face and they will deny it. Listen to Kyle, he completely dismisses right wing ideas such as the min. wage and healthcare. He has said that single payer is an objectively better healthcare system despite the evidence that counters that. I have given that evidence to his fans and they deny it. What does Shapiro have to gain by debating Kyle? Kyle's fan's minds are set and most likely won't change, and Kyle does not have a strong following so not many independents will watch.
1
IceCreamMan 79 , it is a legit point. What has Kyle done with his life? Nothing really. How many books has he written? Writing books is a way to lay out your intellectual ideas for others to read and criticize. He has never done that. He has a youtube channel that takes no calls, he does not do debates, he does not have guests, he literally lives in an echo chamber and never has his ideas challenged.
1
@darkmantlestudios , Shapiro is not scared, and Coulter's reasons were legit, what has Kyle accomplished?
1
@TheLegendaryTwig2000 , Kyle's show is not growing. In fact, it appears to be dying.
1
@andrewb6647 , Kyle literally plagiarized what Bernie was saying when it came to the policies of JD. That isn't impressive.
1
@TheLegendaryTwig2000 , he number of views has been dropping. This channel is dying.
1
popasmuerf ,he has debated members of congress and has appeared on Bill Maher recently. Shapiro goes on college campuses because he is invited there and younger minds are easier to mold and they tend to be more curious on college campuses. Kyle repeats the same things over and over again, he would be too easy of an opponent. Also, what has Kyle accomplished? Nothing. The only people who will watch a Kyle vs Ben debate are Kyle's fans, who are myopic and won't have their minds change, and Ben's fans who will see Kyle is a fool.
1
@andrewb6647 , also, if AOC is your top politician than you are in trouble.
1
@darkmantlestudios , Ann did not back out. Show me proof that Ann backed out? None have been given.
1
@Raptorftw , Sam Seder can't debate. Look at his recent debate at Politicon, he told people to Google it. That is the argument the left has these days. Also, there is no incentive for Shapiro to debate Kyle. The only people who will watch are Ben's fans, who already view Kyle as a fool (if they know who he is), and Kyle's fans who are close minded. If there were people there that will be open minded and can have their ideas changed than it would be worth Ben's time. But Kyle's fans won't listen to Ben and will simply call him stupid or says he just talks fast without providing any counter argument. There is not reason to debate someone as irrelevant as Kyle. Just like Kyle would not waste his time debating me.
1
@Raptorftw , yes, telling people to "google it" is not an argument. The point of a debate is to present your ideas and opinions to an audience and defend it from counter arguments. Telling people to google it shows that they have no idea what they are talking about. Also, if this issue is so easy that one can google it, than why have a debate? Why should Sam Seder have a job? Also, the first point he wanted to Google was wage stagnation. One can argue that wages have not stagnated. From Google one can find these sources https://www.dartmouth.edu/~bsacerdo/Sacerdote%2050%20Years%20of%20Growth%20in%20American%20Wages%20Income%20and%20Consumption%20May%202017.pdf https://www.nber.org/feldstein/WAGESandPRODUCTIVITY.meetings2008.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6FmhXQ32Wo&t=160s All which goes against what Seder believes. One can easily argue that the government is to blame for the 2008 recession due to not preventing bad lending practices. Or that the Federal Reserve is to blame. There are strong arguments in that point. Read the following book https://web.stanford.edu/~johntayl/first-principles/first-principles.htm One can also find that via Google.
1
@Raptorftw , maybe if Seder provided actual sources I can read them and think along the lines he does, but he doesn't. He just tells people to look it up. That is why he is an idiot.
1
@storyspice974 , he isn't scared.
1
@andrewb6647 , that is the point. Kyle and his fans got all butt hurt when Ann Coulter refused to debate him. Her response was that she never heard of him and that he has not accomplished anything. Coulter wrote many best selling books, has been on may shows including Bill Maher, has gave many speeches. So her response was just that" who's Kyle?". Same with me asking Kyle to debate, who am I? That is a legit point. I ask Kyle and his fans to have the same standard towards others which apparently they don't.
1
@TheLegendaryTwig2000 , same in that Kyle is not at the level of Ann Coulter where Ann did not know who Kyle was. So why did Kyle and his fans cry when she refused to debate him? And why are you saying that I am a nobody and thus Kyle won't debate me? I see a double standard.
1
@andrewb6647 , he was invited for the first time in years. What has he done prior to that? Also, seeing the list of politicon it wasn't a strong crowd. What have I done? I have 4 peer reviewed papers in scientific journals and I am a year away from obtaining my PhD and MBA. So I have done a lot, arguably more than Kyle has. Coulter never heard of Kyle before, so he is irrelevant to her. She wrote many best selling books and has appeared on many TV programs. What has Kyle done? Run a youtube channel for 10 years with videos that get only around 40,000 views a video. Coulter never heard of Kyle so why should she debate him? Ana Kasperian help start TYT which is a much larger program than Secular Talk where Secular Talk had to join TYT to gain fame. Ana also taught at a university and gave speeches. Again, what has Kyle done? How many speeches has he given? Politicon was the first time he stepped out of his cave. If you feel it is a cop out to be a certain status than why did Kyle not respond to me? Again, you have double standards. JD is a joke of a group. What have they won? AOC is their most infamous person and she is a joke to almost everyone. JD's policies are literally copying what Bernie said where there are no specifics in how to establish them. Advised not to debate Kyle? Really? Kyle requested those people like a month before Politicon. There was no time to prepare. You know, successful people plan months and years ahead of time. Kyle apparently does not understand that concept. Fact is Kyle would be way too easy of an opponent. He has nothing but talking points and hardly any facts on his side. If you look the debate against Razorfist Razorfist pushed the point that no nation can provide healthcare to all. Kyle lied when he said that no one dies in other nations due to lack of healthcare when in fact they do. Kyle literally has no clue what he is talking about which is why he has a small following. Maybe if he got out of echo chamber sometimes and challenges himself people like Coulter would know who he is and will debate him.
1
@andrewb6647 , saying that JD's policies are for the people is vague. And one can create any group saying that. When AOC asked about what does it mean to be a democratic socialist, she said that it is having the idea that people should not be poor, or along those lines. I feel the same way, does that make me a democratic socialist? No because my ideas in pushing for lower poverty differs from her. I bet you and I have completely different ideas on economics issues. Does that mean I don't want to help the people? No. I do, my ideas are different. So when you say that JD's policies are for the people that is vague and also rude. You are saying that is you don't support JD's policies than you don't want to help the people which is simply not true.
1
This video is a waste. Kyle does not give a counter argument here. He simply says Shapiro is dumb but gave no counter argument. I can see why Kyle is jealous of Shapiro. Shapiro is intelligent and successful, Kyle isn't.
1
@Robert Gomez , Shapiro has a law degree, skipped two grades, wrote many books and debated members of congress. You may disagree with him but he is very intelligent.
1
@aszhara2900 , Friedman is one of the most well respected economist of all time.
1
They are jealous of Ben's success and really don't have a counter argument against him. Listen to this entire video, it is nothing but Kyle saying Shapiro is wrong but with no justification. The reality is that people like Kyle are nobodies and smear Ben to try to gain views.
1