Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Mayor Bill De Blasio Accused Of Anti-Semitism" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Evan Zuppardo uh, the CDC getting funds gutted does not mean they set low standards in defining what a virus death is. But let us look at flu deaths and CDC stats.
In 2012-2013, under Obama, before it got "gutted", there were 42,570 flu deaths. However, the error range is 35,785 to 58,386. That is around 25% error bar.
In 2017 to 2018, after the "gutting", there were 61,099 deaths with an error rage of 46,404 to 94,987. So around 30% error bar. Not much difference.
So I see no evidence that the cuts to the CDC led to any issues.
Your last comment makes you sound like a kid where I am the one acting like an adult.
1
-
1
-
@javierchamorro8988 they never made that conclusion. They were saying that we need to start asking ourselves is being shut down is the best route. Also, as for being peer reviewed, there are right now zero reports that are peer reviewed on the virus. Why? Because it takes months, or even a year to do that. You have to analyze the data, write up on it, edit it, have it reviewed, edit it again, have the editor approve and then published. So the whole "peer reviewed" argument shows a high level of ignorance as nothing on the virus is peer reviewed.
We need as much information as we can get at this point. Dismissing those doctors is foolish. That is especially true since there no legit reason for dismissing them have been given. On group made the claim they just want more patients. Well, ever thought that research group wants to virus situation to last longer so they get more grant money to research it?
So yes, it is leftists' fault. When other states open up and are fine and states ran by crazy democrats suffer you will see.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@javierchamorro8988 your point on deaths not being considered as they die at home is simply not true. Yes, there are some, but we perform autopsies for a reason. Also, again, people dying with the virus typically have a lot of other healthcare complications involved. So you cannot say, with certainty, that the virus was a main contributor. That is what those two doctors are saying and they are correct.
I doubt the the numbers because of the fact that a lot of the media and government officials are censoring things and creating vague forms of regulations. For example, I cannot go to my tailor but I just went to the grocery store full of people. That makes no sense. On top of that you have Barrack Obama going golfing where other people can't. And Michelle is telling people to stay home while his husband golfs. I see this as more of a power grab than trying to keep us safe. There are millions of ways to die, but now this virus is forcing us to stay locked up? I am questioning that.
You claim you want Pelosi out when all government officials supporting lock down are benefiting. What has Bernie done? Nothing but enjoy his millions and his three homes. Same with AOC. This is government oppression. But you are willing to go with it for "safety". You say our rights were taken away long ago. But I was still able to attend sporting events, concerts, go get my hair done, drink at the bar, etc. Can't now.
As for 30 million dying, what do you base that off of? I see no evidence of that. And 30 million does not mean 1/10 of the economy goes away. Most of them will be old and do not produce anything to begin with. When an 80 year old dies the economy actually, arguably, improves as now we do not have to give them money in SS while they produce nothing.
And I agree, we need more data. So why do you support censoring those two doctors? Tell me that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1