Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "US Vaccine Rollout Is Abysmal" video.

Maybe this virus should be a sign that many of our "leaders" and elites do not care about us. While mayor deBlasio tells people to not go to Time Square on NYE him, his wife and some of his buddies enjoyed it dancing. They enjoyed Time Square on NYE without us peasants.
12
There are two reasons for it. One, they can potentially be sued. And two, something like this occurred at a ball park in my city. They gave out food to the homeless after games. They stopped because after games they would gather in large crowds and were violent and a threat to others.
4
@zachthamm9595 I disagree with you on Trump voters as I am one myself. I can easily argue those that opposed him have been brainwashed by the media and have TDS. But I will not get into that. I will say my distrust is based on 1. How many government officials, mainly democrats, enforced these rules but did not follow them themselves. Such as Newsom, or Lightfoot getting a hair cut, or Pelosi getting a hair cut, or Steve Adler telling people not to travel but saying it from his time share home in Mexico, or recently how Mayor deBlasio told us peasants not to visit Time Square on NYE so him, his wife and some friends can enjoy it without us. 2. How much the narrative change from going to deaths, to only cases, to it was only supposed to last 2 weeks, now the vaccine is going slow so we have to wait longer to now a new strain is out 3. How many experts were censored but ones like Fauci weren't. He has been fear mongering the entire time, but when asked about Biden he was cheering on Biden's plan and saying under him things will get better which is a pure political stance he took There are more but those are three main ones. We have been liked to by the elites in our society and while average people like me suffer, the elites enjoy their lives.
4
Leftists: Government is failing at distribution of this vaccine Leftists after watching this: We need more government
3
@zachthamm9595 that is one story I heard which is one reason why the roll out is slow. So many do not trust the federal government. Remember, around 70 million voted for Trump due to their distrust in the media and government.
3
Darth Larper a virus so dangerous they have to keep telling us to wear masks and social distance. Other things that are dangerous we are not reminded of on a daily basis Not sticking fingers in sockets Not staring at the sun Not having unprotected sex with strangers Not putting loaded guns to your head The list goes on. If the virus was that dangerous they should not have to remind people everyday about it.
3
@bigben6564 the vaccine took around 9 months to develop and has not been tested long term. Covid-19 is not the only coronavirus that exists. Others do that are not that deadly, neither is covid 19. Putting me in a position I will choose millions of years of evolutionary biology than a vaccine. What I am saying I will trust the fact that if I get covid 19 chances are very high I become immune and very low anything bad will happen. With a manmade vaccine I have doubt.
3
@bigben6564 other vaccines took longer to developed. The human body typically develops immunity with no long term issues with other viruses in the past, including coronaviruses. I trust that as it has a longer track record compared to this new vaccine. That is my point. "If you want to talk about long term side effects, how about you look at the increasingly abundant evidence showing COVID-19 may cause chronic myocarditis, neurological deficits pulmonary fibrosis" This is the irony in that covid 19 has been around less than a year, you cannot say if those effects are long term. Also, how healthy were those people to begin with? You have to consider that. " but there is a plethora of evidence to suggest the virus itself poses greater risks to long term health by over 100 fold. " There isn't though, that is the point. And you tell me to simply look them online without providing some resources to start with says a lot.
3
@lowspeeddata care to explain?
3
@mckenzie.latham91 ever hard of T-cells? They are being developed with those who become infected. Also, your cry of racism makes your argument irrelevant. It shows you have no argument at this point.
3
@seamon9732 ok, and? They have issues as well. Hope they enjoy the advanced technology and care the US create while they ration it.
2
@frevazz3364 to many, including me, this is not a pandemic but a scam. Also, if you look across many institution a hands off approach from leadership typically works best. States are all ran differently and face different situations. The federal government cannot micromanage them, they never could.
2
@chairmanofrussia government work. Same way in how the hours of the DMV is not 24/7 for example. Look at the hours of government offices.
2
@bigben6564 what is a large sample size? Also, what will happen long term? Again, I rather trust millions of years of evolutionary biology over a vaccine made in less than a year with limited testing. Give a few years I might take it, but by then so many others have I won't have to.
2
@mckenzie.latham91 if the democrats did win Georgia enjoy the push for communism and the common people being oppressed even more. But hey, take your stimulus check and shut up, peasant, people like deBlasio have to enjoy Time Square without the peasants.
2
Cee Wil that he paid for out of pocket. What is your point?
1
@thefelix7767 that is not true, at least in the US. Medicare has more overhead than private insurance. And saying it is cheaper only occurs if you lower quality and access which other nations do. For example, the US pays a lot but we offer a lot. We offer the most CT scans per capita. Now an argument can be made on if we should be offering that much care, but the reality is that cheaper means less efficient, lower quality and limited access. Also, government programs are constantly abused and that only is prevented with more government bureaucrats. Your argument works backwards. There is a reason why Medicare is losing money in the US and had to be reformed multiple times.
1
@CorporateShill66 when did I say no government? I said limited government. There is value in having government, but it needs to be limited. We have the blue print. The Constitution dictates what the federal government can do and gives all other responsibilities to the states and local governments as the more local a government is the easier it is to control. Also, the Constitution limits them as well. Also, with large government, as we are seeing now, the rich control a lot. Remember, take you stimulus check while Mayor deBlasio enjoys Time Square with his wife on NYE without our peasants, or Pelosi enjoys a hair cut with no mask, or Newsome enjoys an expensive dinner indoors.
1
Cee Wil you are pointing to one example where, again, he paid for out of pocket and moved to the front of the line. So how many in Canada can actually afford that care to begin with?
1
@thefelix7767 not true. To start, Medicare has other government agencies to pass cost onto that do not count towards overhead cost in Medicare. For example, the IRS collecting taxes does not count as overhead cost in Medicare where private insurance does not have that luxury. Private insurance also make payments that reduce costs such as fraud prevention for example where Medicare, again, can pass that onto other agencies. If you were to do an administrative cost per beneficiary Medicare cost more. Why? Because medicare patients are older and thus the healthcare cost to them are already expensive. Thus if you look at total payment from Medicare and their overhead costs (which again they pass many onto other agencies) and do a ratio, you will get 3% only because the total payments in general are so high. A simple math lesson. Say Medicare pays $100 in healthcare bills $3 of it is overhead, that is 3%. Now say private insurance pays $10 in healthcare bills to someone and pay $1 in overhead, that is 10%. However, they paid less per person already in overhead. An article in Forbes entitled "The Myth of Medicare's 'Low Administrative Costs'" Explains it. Basically, at the very least, you are comparing two completely different programs that, at the very least, calculate overhead costs differently make a comparison a challenge to begin with.
1
@joshcourt1393 That is not how it works. No one is saying no government. And when they say smaller, more local government they mean that with limits. As for funding, when I hear the left say we just have to fund government programs more they are admitting that government is inefficient. A private company cannot just ask for more money, they have to make due with what resources they have. Government should do that as well. The smaller, more local it is the more it can do that. Also, taxpayer subsidies and liability protections to big pharma is a great example of an overpower government.
1
@thefelix7767 one reason why healthcare is so expensive is that even though medicare pays a lot, they still pay 40% less than private insurance. Why? Well, in the 70s and early 80s healthcare providers were sucking Medicare dry. They were over treating patients and having them stay in hospitals for too long. And why should the patient care, they were not paying. So in the 80s bipartisan reform was done saying Medicare will essentially only pay X amount. So that means Medicare pays, overall, 40% less than private insurance. Another reason is that many visit the ER and do not pay. I went to the ER recently. They gave me care and then charged me. I did not have to pay right away and if I did not pay they cannot do anything. So in the end what healthcare providers do is jack up prices for others. You see, in a way we do have universal healthcare in that regards. Compare it to this. Say you ran a restaurant. There, you have a set of customers that pay 40% less, mixed in with the fact you have to serve customers first and then charge them where a good portion do not pay. What will you do? For those who do pay you will charge more. " If we expanded coverage for everyone then we would have an influx of less costly patients that would make the overall system cheaper on average per patient. " Not true. One, the "less costly patients" will be younger ones that pay very little taxes to begin with. So now you will be covering them when they pay essentially zero. So now you doubled down on the system on that you have the retired who are getting care while paying zero, and the young as well. You made the system more expensive.
1
@joshcourt1393 you know what creates monopolies? Government restrictions. A free market expands and gives people more choices and thus a better system. Government restrictions limits options which is what we are seeing now with this vaccine. Who bought my government? If it has limitations no one can. Think about how lobbying and corruption will grow even more if the federal government was paying for your healthcare. That is 1/6 of the economy. That is screaming for corruption. It will become "see this doctor, not this one" or "take this medication, not this one" while politicians and the elites pay their way to get to the front of the line. Consider how many politicians already "received" the vaccine. The more local the government the more it serves the people as they have more control over it As for your solutions 1. It will fail as now the current, established politicians will change the rules so only they and their buddies get money 2. Define "popular", also, airtime is limited and different slots have different viewership 3. No term limits on judges and House of representatives. On judges, they have to make very unpopular decisions at times. With the House, they are up for re-election every 2 years and change is often. There are arguments for term limits which I would like in the Senate as they serve 6 year terms, but the counter argument is that if someone is doing well, why remove them? 4. Ok, what?
1
Huh? The federal government has been growing for 50 years. Expansion of Medicare, creation of the EPA and Department of Education. Creation of the federal student loan programs. The truth is that people on the left place so much trust in government but then become angered when that same government refuses to help.
1
@frevazz3364 a hands off approach works in many ways. The federal government cannot micromanage this issue.
1
@baburnit the problem with "defund the police" is that many people read it as such that. Next, a lot of what you want to create relies on there being the resources to do it in the first place. Do you have enough psychologists to handle mental health? Or enough nurses to work in healthcare clinics? It also shows the flaws of government. You say "Also, many of the programs I specifically listed should have a positive effect on reducing crime if properly funded and maintained to establish reliability" Which, right away, shows the shortcomings of government programs. In the private sector they cannot just ask for more money, they need to do the best with the resources they have. You saying government programs need to be properly funded admits how inefficient government programs are because instead of getting the best out of their resources they ask for more money.
1
@baburnit " It would be asinine to assume that what I have listed will not improve communities and the well-being of the citizens of that community - especially in contrast to more militarized police." It depends on the community. Would a government managed program work better or some charity and volunteer system? And I did not misunderstood what you meant by funding and reliability. It is an argument I hear from the left all the time. They complain that a system will work better if it is funded better. That, to me, says that government programs are poorly mismanaged as a whole, they can't be creative and cannot make best use of their resources. This is why so many say government programs are inefficient. There are others but that is one. I work at a university, not a top tier one thus we do not have much money. We have to become creative in how we build our instruments. We are not like MIT that has a plethora of money laying around. Thus, a lot of times we find cheap equipment online and become creative. And please, list the studies. I will love to read them. Overall, though, it is not a black and white as you make it out to be. Just throwing money at an issue does not mean it will improve, especially if it is a failing system to begin with. Also, the private sector has participated in local community efforts. Let me ask you, how often have you participated in your local community? I do a lot and see a lot of donations from private businesses. You bring up "militarized police departments", I did not know the police had F-21 fighter jets and access to nuclear warheads. "there are hundreds of sociologists, historians, and public policy experts that have documented the impact of policing and the gutting of public services in the past 50 years." Then list me a few and I can follow the paper trail.
1
@baburnit on your video, right away with the title I can tell it is worthless as they mention George Floyd. Have you seen the full George Floyd video? He was high on drugs, there were 3 other black individuals in the car that were not harmed at all, he wanted to lay on the ground and was complaining about not breathing prior to going on the ground. Also, anyone can lay their knee on someone, so how is that militarization of the police? So how am I losing?
1
Kyle: "Government officials are doing poorly at distributing the vaccine" Also Kyle: "We need more government in healthcare" And this is why the far left continues to lose. How did the squad do again in forcing the vote on Pelosi?
1
@anthonydukes2009 that is not true as insurance companies are not becoming involved with the vaccine. Those that want it will get it depending on the phases. We have different phases in my state where phase 1 are healthcare workers and at risk people. No insurance needed, you walk up and get it. Centralized planning is high level of bureaucracy as typically it gets filled with too many administrators and they cannot micromanage complex issues. You want to remove bureaucracy, stick to a smaller, more local route.
1
@anthonydukes2009 again, the local governments are in charge. Again, in my state you do not need insurance. What is causing the slow roll outs are one, many governors blocking the system, two, many healthcare workers refusing to take it, and three, the media simply giving a deceptive story. With a centralized system the federal government could not micromanage this. Consider how they are messing up the stimulus package right now, do you really think they can handle healthcare?
1
@anthonydukes2009 The UK has a centralized system and is facing problems as well. Also, many people are not anti-vaxxers, they do not trust this vaccine and for great reasons. For how often the government jerked us around this year I do not trust it. I have all my vaccines, I do not trust this one. And governors are purposely holding it back. We have seen this year many governors go great lengths to ruin people's lives to make Trump look bad. Just watch, when Biden enters office all of a sudden the vaccine roll out will "improve" as governors will push it out and the media will claim it has. Face it, even with the vaccine coming out under Trump people are still finding a way to criticize him on it. Not to be rude but how cannot you not see all of this by now?
1
@anthonydukes2009 remember when people were saying we were not going to get a vaccine before the end of the year to begin with?
1
@anthonydukes2009 you should care what the media says. Dr. Fauci was doing an interview recently and is already praising Biden saying Biden will be able to get 1 million vaccinated a day and how Biden's 100 day mask mandate will work. Right away Fauci is praising Biden where the media was praising Fauci. The UK is having problems. People said we would not even have a vaccine until next year, but under Trump we did. Now the media and democrats are changing the narrative, again, to ridicule Trump. Not surprising. Also, this "alternative media channel" gets a lot of info from MSM. Saying "alternative media channel" is a cop out. If MSM does not exist who on Kyle's team is going to go out and do interviews? No one. That is one great example right there how your comment is a cop out.
1
How did he give us breadlines and poverty?
1
@donHooligan I do see what is going on. Democrats overblew this virus to make everyone miserable. Remember, take your stimulus check and shut up, peasant, people like Mayor deBlasio want to enjoy Time Square without you, and Newsome want to enjoy an expensive dinner indoors while shutting small businesses down.
1
But if Biden gets in office the media will change their tune that under Biden vaccine roll outs are going great.
1
The average age of death in 9/11 was 40 years old. In NYC the oldest person to die was 79. Can't compare this to a virus where the average age of death is over 80 years old.
1