Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Tucker Carlson’s Staggeringly Silly Green New Deal Conspiracy" video.

  1. FDR turned a recession into a depression. His new deal was not good for the nation.
    3
  2. He did a lot for the economy. He turned a recession into a depression.
    3
  3.  @stevendallyjr9468  , I think you should go beyond American History 101 and study some economics on the side.
    3
  4.  @jimmydane34  , how many recessions in the US took around 10 years to recover from? The recession of 1929 and the recession of 2007. What happened in those times? The federal government tried to "fix" the economy with massive spending. In 2007 we saw the bailouts. In 1929 Hoover was increasing spending in relief programs and FDR doubled down. In 1921 there was a recession and Hoover was asked to come up with a plan. A year later he developed a plan but at that point, with the federal government doing nothing, the economy improved. The recession of 1921 was just as bad as the 1929 one. Fast forward to 1929 Hoover installed the plan he developed in 1921-1922 as it was there. The economy got worse. FDR took over and doubled down and the economy did not improve until WWII. The war got us out of the recession. How? If forced the federal government to deal with foreign affairs as opposed to domestic ones. Also, it created a global demand for our goods. It is no coincidence that under FDR recover following the recession was the slowest it has ever been. To me people who feel FDR was good for the economy must also feel Matt Millen was a good GM for the Lions.
    2
  5.  @jimmydane34  https://mises.org/library/how-fdr-made-depression-worse
    2
  6.  @jimmydane34  https://fee.org/articles/franklin-roosevelt-and-the-greatest-economic-myth-of-the-twentieth-century/
    2
  7.  @robertjenkins6132  , the war did two things 1. Forced the federal government to deal with foreign affairs and get out of domestic one 2. Actually create a demand for our goods You can't just create demand in which FDR tried to do. The market does that in some way. FDR tried to manage the economy through a centralize system. You can't do that which is why FDR's system failed. The economy is too complex. Read the essay "I, Pencil". That gives and example of how complex the economy is. People who feel FDR was a good president simply can't think for themselves.
    2
  8.  @malikanthony1149  , Hoover implemented a plan to fix the during the recession of 1921. A year later he had it but the economy was improving so they did not install it. Come 1929 Hoover installed his plan following the recession which involved expanding the federal government, mainly the spending. The economy got worse. FDR doubled down on it and the economy did not recover until WWII. No other time in the history of this nation has it took around a decade to recover from a recession with the exception of one, the 2007 recession.
    2
  9.  @stevendallyjr9468  https://mises.org/library/how-fdr-made-depression-worse
    2
  10.  @stevendallyjr9468  https://fee.org/articles/franklin-roosevelt-and-the-greatest-economic-myth-of-the-twentieth-century/
    2
  11.  @stevendallyjr9468  , what did I say that was wrong? Please educate me history teacher.
    2
  12. The GND is an asinine proposal. It is literally a push for communism. AOC is being a hypocrite in pushing it, and the climate change alarmist have gone way too far on this one.
    1
  13.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  , it is.
    1
  14.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  , it is. Sorry you can't accept reality. But whatever, you feel Bernie is not a part of the establishment despite him not calling out the DNC and also endorsing Clinton.
    1
  15. Kyle is an idiot here. No wonder Justice Democrats are fools.
    1
  16.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  , FDR's system did fail. You can't just give people money to buy things that don't exist. You can't consume what you don't produce.
    1
  17.  Galactic President Superstar McAwesomeville  , never said it was good. But it created demand.
    1
  18.  @thereisnospectrum  "empirical academic sources", what ones? I just references economists. Reality is that experts will disagree on this issue. There will be some that will praise FDR and others who opposed him. In reality he did some good things. The FDIC literally made it so hundred of banks were shutting down daily to zero banks. But as a whole his "success" is exaggerated and he did a lot more harm than good. Tell me when did it take around 10 years to recover from a recession in this history of this nation? Mark Blyth is not even an economist, that is a fact.
    1
  19.  @jimmydane34  , I didn't. The 2008 crash was from the Federal Reserve.
    1
  20. No right winger is opposed to going to other forms of energy. They simply want the private sector to advance it as they feel the federal government hinders progress. There is evidence for it. Also, as someone who hangs around of people who lean right, they do support energy efficient goods. I was talking to my tailor the other day, he leans right. He replaced all of the lights in his business so it will save energy. Working at the restaurant I did for years the owner there leaned right. He was willing to do the same thing with his light bulbs. So there, I answered your question.
    1
  21. Yeah, and?
    1
  22. @Adrian Nelson , I bring data all the time on these points, especially on the issue of healthcare. You just deny it.
    1
  23.  @stevendallyjr9468  , no data? Really? What is data to you? "The price of gold was increased from $20.67 to $35.00 per ounce, a 69% increase, but the domestic price level increased only 7% between 1933 and 1934, and over rest of the decade it hardly increased at all" ' That seems like data to me. Also, what was wrong about the sources? You say there are no facts. Where are they wrong? Next, saying he was elected 4 times is a poor argument. Since 1900 look at often the incumbent won re-election. Those that lost did so because the nation got worse under their watch. For example, under Carter the economy got worse so he lost to Reagan. FDR was elected during a recession. Things did not get worse under him but they did not better. People, thus, re-elected him. Consider this G W Bush was re-elected as well. FDR did not fix anything. Name me another time it took around a decade for the economy to recover from a recession? You can't. The crash we just had was from the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates low.
    1
  24.  @breadpill8299  what is wrong with that source?
    1
  25. Tucker isn't wrong on this one. AOC creates a crisis and uses that crisis to push a complete take over of the economy. Luckily, AOC is too dumb to convince people to support her ideas.
    1
  26.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  , climate change is a cash and power grab. Notice how the far left does not cite actual scientist in this GND push? Meanwhile you have scientists like Mike Hulme who are critical of climate change alarmists "Mike Hulme, also a professor at the University of East Anglia and a contributor to IPCC reports, wrote in 2009: “What is causing climate change? By how much is warming likely to accelerate? What level of warming is dangerous? - represent just three of a number of contested or uncertain areas of knowledge about climate change.”" https://www.heartland.org/publications-resources/publications/research--commentary-the-myth-of-a-global-warming-consensus?source=policybot You should read his book entitled "Why We Disagree About Climate Change" As the OP said, you are not a climate scientist.
    1
  27.  @thepolishlatinofromphilly9709  , you don't understand science bud.
    1
  28. Exactly.
    1
  29. You don't want a democracy. That means the majority oppresses the minority.
    1
  30. Some do, but AOC and her gang are so lost in their bubble they feel their ideas are popular. Look at AOC, she never goes on shows with opposing viewpoints. I actually like this though, it makes the democratic party look insane.
    1