Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Trump Supporter Can't Name A Single Policy Of His" video.

Consider how often the left is doing "orange man bad" with no justification, it has turned into wrestling at this point.
4
@celticbird2398 , well, one reason why people voted for Trump was to watch the left explode. I hate Trump but as long as the left freaks out in an irrational way I will vote for him again.
3
@jesusmohammed3060 , very few worry about climate change. Besides, Bernie is lying big time about climate change.
3
Robert Miller , how has he emboldened racists? And pimping our soldiers, really? And there will be no war in Iran. And 7 million decided not to buy healthcare when they were no longer forced to. The deficit is actually around the normal level compared to years prior. That being around -3% of GDP which is around the norm. But please, go on.
2
@timmtheilig6827 , accused is different than proof. And how does he promote bigotry? He wants a wall to control illegal immigration which is a problem in this nation. As in Persian nations, the government is the problem, he has nothing against the people. How does he redistribute wealth from the bottom up? How does his foreign policy make the world more dangerous? The Paris Agreement was worthless. No one is following it. The things you listed are completely wrong. That is the problem. The left wing media continues to lie about Trump because of two reasons 1. He is changing the status quo where they will no longer be in power 2. They live in a fantasy world.
2
@roswellsatterwhite3906 , saying "wealth inequality" is a very poor argument. Read the paper entitled "Measuring inequality " In Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Just saying 'inequality" is weak as it does not tell the full story.
2
Trump will win easily. Notice how Bernie cannot argue about the economy against Trump? Because the economy is better under Trump.
2
@ZXD7250 , people only care about the economy. What does Bernie have to offer at this point?
2
@EscapeTheHector ,what was the point of Trump debating a non candidate?
2
@ZXD7250 , the economy is good. It starts from there. With a strong economy comes high paying jobs, lower prices, and people are happy. On the environment, Greta is brain washed and politicians are using her. Scientists like Mike Hulme and Myles Allen (who was the lead author of that IPCC report) have openly stated that climate change activists are very misleading, to being dangerous rallying about a climate deadline as that is not what the report says. But hey, why listen to scientists when you can listen to a teenage girl. Bernie is worse as he is pushing for radical ideas, with no plan, while refusing and flat out dismissing the other side. He is dangerous.
2
@1rony230 , you mean detailed arguments with support from experts? The economy is doing great. For example, home ownership is going up.
2
@1rony230 , home ownership is going up. Home ownership has always been low for the young. That is nothing new. But according to FRED stats home ownership is going up. Also, how much of the young not owning a home because a lot more of them are deciding to go to college prior to getting a career, and work in the city and live in an apartment? You have to consider that. Besides, wages are going up as well.
2
@Spunky1991 , the percent of those working more than one job has been falling. Wages are going up. The stock market indicates investment.
2
@Spunky1991 , the majority of Americans don't own a business, so what is your point? When a business is doing well where investors invest in it then that helps out the middle class. The stock market shows that businesses are worth investing to which can expand their company. "The overwhelming majority of economists agree that Trump's economy is a continuation of Obama's economy." Not true. But I learned over time that far leftists are delusional. Enjoy 4 more successful years of Trump.
2
It goes both ways. I am here constantly grilling Bernie supporters and none of them give me an actual answer related to his policies.
1
@JohnnySplendid , try me.
1
Hilde Hildegard , I have read his policies. They are radical with no details. "Educate people", how? Education is on the individual. Clean the planet? Who is opposed to that. What people oppose is how anti-science Bernie is where he pushes for radical plans. Crony unionism is just as bad as crony capitalism. Bernie does not care about anyone but himself. That is why when people have a legit concern with his ideas he just dismiss them. When the hair salon owner from Texas during the debate against Cruz asked about Obamacare and her business, Bernie just said "screw you, follow the law". He had no desire to understand her position. But let me ask you three questions 1. On tuition free college how will he handle the NCAA? 2. On M4A how will he prevent providers from raising prices? 3. Under M4A what if a doctor had to many patients so he won't serve me? Now I can't choose my doctor like claims.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , how so?
1
@KaiserMattTygore927 , we are not going to war.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , what cuts to welfare? And tax cuts were good and for all. What open corruption? What authoritarian judges? What extreme anti immigration policies? Climate change is grossly overstated and scientists are saying that. The defense budget has been dropping for years. How about you address the claims you made with examples before going on.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , it isn't a stupid reason at this point in time. The political left has become insane and are completely delusional when it comes to reality. Look at how the ACLU rewarded Christine Ford with the courage award for doing nothing. Look at the Jussie Smollet incident. Look at how that poor, brain washed girl Greta was promoted Time person of the year. The left has gone insane.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 1. The welfare cuts exist in SNAP where states are picking up the slack as they should. Welfare should be a state issue. Trump has been pushing in giving more responsibilities to the states. Besides, the economy is improving so less people depend on welfare. 2. The tax cuts were for everyone who pay taxes. 3. He donated to politicians which he admitted to and admitted that is the problem with the current system and he is changing that. The system is the federal government has too much power and can bought and thus it caters to the rich. If he is so corrupt why is he reducing the powers of the federal government? And how has he used his position for his own benefits? I don't see him trying to control my life or wallet. 4. What judges? Kavanuagh? The one who voted in favor of planned parenthood? 5. How do they treat illegal immigrants? By giving them food, shelter and water? 6. Climate change is grossly overstated. As said by prof. Myles Allen in the article of The Conversation regarding the deadline "My biggest concern is with the much-touted line that “the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says we have 12 years” before triggering an irreversible slide into climate chaos. Slogan writers are vague on whether they mean climate chaos will happen after 12 years, or if we have 12 years to avert it. But both are misleading." Or prof. Mike Hulme writing a paper in Nature Climate Change entitled "Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous" But why listen to scientists when you can listen to Greta say "How dare you". 7. The defense budget has been dropping for decades from around 10% of GDP in 1970 to less than 4% now. 8. It isn't about specific cases. The media praised Greta on climate change and they are praising AOC who misrepresents the IPCC report when one of the lead authors said saying we have 12 years to act misleading. Look at how Christine Ford was propped up by politicians even though there is no evidence. Look at the impeachment trial. Look at how people are saying Trump is going to start WW III even though things quickly died down. The media and leftists are over exaggerating things and making things up. They live in a delusional world.
1
@roswellsatterwhite3906 , were they insane? From what I see is that he is passing the buck onto the state. Plus, with a growing economy less welfare is needed.
1
@roswellsatterwhite3906 , we will always have a presence there, it is needed. Were they massive cuts to those programs or more of since less need them cuts were made? Also, how much is the states picking up the slack? Plus, the military budget has been dropping for decades where social welfare programs have been increasing for decades. Far leftists have this idea that we can improve by 1. Taxing the rich more 2. Cut defense spending 3. Increase social welfare spending Where for decades we have been doing that. Under Trump we are doing the opposite and the nation is improving. People are doing great based on how wages and home ownership is going up.
1
@roswellsatterwhite3906 , define "economic inequality". It is hard to measure. Read the study entitled "Measuring inequality" In the Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Bernie harps on "wealth inequality" when that is flaws. One thing they write on that is "There are a number of challenges, however, in using wealth to study inequality. First, it is illiquid, so it may not give a clear reflection of one’s immediate access to resources. Second, the easily measurable components of wealth—like financial wealth—are incomplete. Take, for example, a student. In many cases their student debt will outweigh their other financial assets, and so they will have negative financial wealth. However, we would not typically say that they are in a worse position than never having studied at all. The reason is because the student has taken on debt to accumulate human capital, which is valuable as a means to increase lifetime earnings but not typically counted as wealth. Policies designed to reduce wealth inequality could therefore have many undesirable consequences, not least redistributing away from people with zero assets towards those with negative assets." This is a problem with Bernie and his fans.They scream "inequality" with no real analysis.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 1. Welfare is nowhere in the Constitution, thus it, like public education, state roads, murder laws, etc. are state issues. Some areas don't have to rely heavily on government welfare as they have strong charities. Others do. It all depends on the area. A one size fits all policy never works. 2. They do benefit all. The rich received more because they pay more to begin with. When you pay $0 in taxes you can't cut more. Also, one can easily argue tax cuts lead to growth and thus more revenue. What is higher, 50% of 100 or 10% of 1000? 3. Yes he is by limiting the powers the federal government has. That is why so many democrats hate him. 4. They are here illegally. We give them shelter, food and water. Really I feel we should just shoot them but that is just me. We house them and send them back. What do you want to give them? A stay at a 5 star hotel with a pool and a free massage? 5. So I cited two scientists on the issue and you just dismiss me? How can I take you serious at this point? 6. We can't drop more or we go below the NATO agreement. While other nations don't follow it, we do. Shows why the Paris Agreement was garbage. 7. You call me dumb but you dismissed actual scientists' opinions on climate change, one that was one of the lead authors of that IPCC report.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , I cite titles of studies. I cited a Nature paper. If you can't trust a Nature paper I can't take you serious. Tell me, why are you anti-science?
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , he has limited the powers of the federal government by lowering taxes, reducing the powers of the EPA and Department of Education and transferring welfare responsibilities to the states.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , uh, Nature is one of the most prestigious journals you can publish in. It has a high impact fact. It is a peer reviewed paper. With that I can't take you serious when you don't know how high of an impact the journal Nature is.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_(journal)
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , sorry, but you clearly have no clue what you are talking about.
1
@thepolishlatinofromphilly9709 , every scientists know how impactful a Nature paper is.
1
@roswellsatterwhite3906 , the problem with looking at the 20s compared to now is that the population is much larger now compared to the 20s. Also, the economy was much different then.
1
@jesusmohammed3060 , he has no details. He just repeats the same talking points over and over again.
1
@EscapeTheHector , because Bernie, in the end, cried about it. It caused Bernie to become dramatic and look pathetic when in reality he was irrelevant. It worked.
1
@baseboy1241 , Denmark has more of a flat tax compared to the US. The highest tax bracket covers those who earn $55,000 a year or more. In the US it is around $400,000 a year and more. They also have lower corporate tax rates. They are also much smaller and less diverse.;
1
@baseboy1241 , uh, the deficit is around the norm compared to previous years at around -3% of GDP.
1
@baseboy1241 , again, the US deficit is comparable compared to previous.
1
@baseboy1241 , Denmark has had plenty of deficits.
1
@1rony230 , according to FRED home ownership in Q2 2016 was 62.9%. Q3 2019 was 64.8%. This was after it dropped from 69.2% in Q2 2004 to 62.9% in Q2 2016. What happened in 2016? So yes, there has been an increase in home ownership. After it dropped nearly 7% in 12 years it has gone up in around 2% in 3 years. You do the math. Again, more millenials decided to go to college compared to previous generations, and they decided to move and work in the city where they were most likely going to rent. My parents owned a home when there were my age, 32. I live in an apartment. However, I am pursuing my PhD where my dad did not even have a college degree. See the difference? You just can't throw numbers out there and expect them to mean anything. From 1996 to 2006 college enrollment went up 24% according to the National Center for Education Statistics. From 2006 to 2016 post baccalaureate enrollment increased 15%. Again, more millennials are going to college and also going to graduate school delaying owning a home. You know what else people are doing at an older age now? Getting married. Why? They rather focus on schools and staring a career as opposed to getting marriage. You say 'inflation", what level of inflation? CPI, PCE, GDP deflator? I bet you did not know there were many ways to measure inflation. Also, inflation measures have many flaws. For example, they don't account for new technology. A car today is more expensive then a car in the 70s. However, cars today last longer, get better gas mileage and are safer, all which saves money. I suggest you read the following two studies "Fifty Years of Growth in American Consumption, Income, and Wages" by prof. Bruce Sacerdote "Did Wages Reflect Growth in Productivity?" by prof. Martin S. Feldstein Also, the Atlanta Fed and FRED stats have wages and median earnings going up. Homeownership has been going up.
1
@Spunky1991 , home ownership is going up under Trump when it was going down under Obama. Wages are going up. Stock market up. A lot of indicators suggests the economy has improved much more under Trump than Obama.
1
@Spunky1991 , according to the Atlanta Fed and FRED stats wages and median earnings are going up. And again, the percent of workers working more than one job is low, and that is even with the gig economy of Lyft and Uber. The stock market went up a lot under Trump meaning investors are investing which grows the economy. That grows the middle class with jobs.
1
@1rony230 , I literally proved to you that home ownership is increasing when you said it isn't. At this point I can't take you serious when you deny facts. If you earn a college degree and the best you can do is work at McDonalds, that is your fault. Besides that, statistically people with college degrees don't work there. But again, you deny facts. Also, those with college degrees are not earning the min. wage. And when you talk about inflation there are many methods to measuring it. The fact you did not know that says a lot. My comparison of cars is legit. This is somethnig economists know and why the Boskin Commission was created, as CPI inflation was always overstated for reasons like that. Not to be rude, but you really need to study more economics.
1
@baseboy1241 , would you rather decide how much care you receive or let the government decide for you?
1
@yarpenzirgin1826 , I will be.
1