Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Tucker's Impossibly Smug Guest Goes After Bernie u0026 AOC Supporters" video.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20.  @AltoSnow  1. Scandinavian nations have more of a flat tax compared to the US. For example, Denmark's highest tax rate covers those who earn $55,000 a year or more. The US highest tax rate is for those making $400,000 a year or more. Bernie and AOC preaches about taxing the rich more, not increasing all taxes. So no, they don't want a Scandinavian system, they want a Venezuela system. Venezuela based their economy on one source, oil. And when that failed the economy failed. AOC and Bernie want to fund their economy on one source, the rich. So what if they move? Nordic nations are much smaller and their culture is vastly different. They are willing to pay higher taxes, US citizens don't. So tell me, how do they want to copy the Scandinavian model when they only want to tax the rich? 2. Then why did her website talk about people getting money even if they are unwilling to work? Also, where is the incentive to work when Bernie promises you, no matter what job you have a "living wage", healthcare, no loans, vacation and maternity leave, etc.? Tell me, why should I work harder when I can just expect all of these things from the government? 3. If it was a draft, then where is the final work? She may have retracted it but the GND is her baby. I don't expect her to let something like that leak so easily. If so then I don't trust her at all on anything. But again, where is the final draft? 4. You source even said that most of the Tea Party are sincere where as AOC is saying they are all white supremacists. This is a problem with the far left. They cry racism on everything without any evidence. Are there white supremacists in the tea party? Maybe, I am willing to accept that. But when you evidence is that they are supposedly meeting up with them then I can't really buy into it. 5. FDR turned a recession into a depression. And no, as mentioned above, their ideas are not aligned with the rest of the Western world.
    1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24.  @AltoSnow  1. They want to base their economy on taxing the rich only whether it be corporations or "millionaires and billionaires". Nordic nations that you pointed to and people like AOC and Bernie pointed to have more of a flat tax and tax far more people at a higher rate. They are not placing all their eggs in one basket like Venezuela. So yes, they do want to copy Venezuela in funding their large welfare programs from one source. " Sander's proposed tax plan leaves brackets of people earning under $250,000 per year completely unaltered, for example" Which is my point. Nordic nations tax everyone more, not just the rich. "You said it yourself, Scandinavian economies are much smaller. Hence why, when we adapt their system, we would obviously have to make some necessary tweaks, such as increasing the number of tax brackets." Smaller means you can micromanage because you are dealing with a less diverse crowd. Take education for example in the US. A state like NV is constantly ranked low in K-12 education because they don't value education as high. Why? Because you can live find without a strong education. You can work in the mines or make $80,000 a year serving drinks or parking cars. Now a state like MA values education high. It is also home to Boston College, Harvard, MIT, etc. They have more 4 year college per capita compared to NV. So why should the people of NV agree to pay more in taxes when they don't value what it is being spent on? 2. Ok, so where is the final copy? "People still need to put food on the table, and take care of their kids (even if they don't need to spend their entire lives saving to put them through college anymore) but instead of working out of desperation, they work to raise their standard of living. " Why? Ask Bernie for a handout. Isn't he pushing for universal childcare and pre-k? Also, if people want to raise their standard of living why aren't more people pushing to become engineers or doctors? I know about Malta. It is heavily based on tourism, people with money. So of course they have a lot of funds. Also, with such a small population it is easy to micromanage programs like that. The city urban area I live in has more people than Malta. So Malta is a poor comparison. They have far less diversity, a completely different culture, and a good portion of their economy is based on tourism which is a lot of money. Besides, Malta's highest tax bracket is around $67,000 a year or more. 3. Ok, where it is on her website? 4. So you are not willing to admit AOC plays identity politics and is a hypocrite when she does it? 5. Again, no. Their tax brackets cover way more people which you are ignoring. Again with Malta, their highest tax bracket covers people earning around $67,000 a year or more. You even admitted that anyone earning less than $250,000 a year or less in the US won't see an increase in taxes. So Bernie and AOC want to spend like those other nations but not tax like them. So no, they don't want to copy those nations which is my point. "America is the only developed western country that doesn't have some form of single payer. " Not really an argument. We do many things well in healthcare. FDR turned a recession into a depression. When was the last time it took nearly a decade to recover from a recession? Also, the war got us out. The New Deal caused many problems.
    1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1