Comments by "whyamimrpink78" (@whyamimrpink78) on "Rebel HQ" channel.

  1. He "works" 40 hours a week. And he is not even married but got his girlfriend knocked up. This is a guy who is asking for a handout. Also, if these two want to make a difference they have to get involved in local elections. Just voting for a president means nothing. Typical Bernie supporters, idiots asking for handouts.
    2
  2. Drake, smaller government means the government has less power. When it has less power than it can't be bought. Bernie wants that same government to run your healthcare and more of your tax dollars and for it to police itself. That will not work. Sure Bernie may not take big money, but what about the other 534 members of congress? And sure, Bernie may create a law stopping it, but who is going to support it? Why would other politicians support cutting their paycheck? This is why Cruz wants smaller, more local government. Strip the power from the federal government and it won't be bought as it has nothing to sell.
    2
  3. Yeah, because shouting "MILLIONAIRES AND BILLIONAIRES" is a winning debate strategy.
    2
  4. Jill Stein is a nut.
    1
  5. This is like that high school football team down 63-0 finally scoring a touchdown. They celebrate but they are still losing.
    1
  6. +eric moss If the Patriots played a HS football team it would be 63-0 within 5 minutes of the game....assuming they try their hardest.
    1
  7. People don't want to vote for a nut, that is a fact. Bernie was a nut, a career politician, the establishment.
    1
  8. +Pat Andler Fracking does not cause earthquakes and fracking, overall, is not bad. Why do you want to kill jobs and raise energy prices by banning fracking?
    1
  9. +john carlisle Saying fracking causes earthquakes is a huge stretch. Does it, in a small way possibly, but in a small way. Canada has been doing fracking for a few decades now. The area where they frack they have, in the same time period, seen around the same number of earthquakes but of much small magnitude. So no, it is not a "proven fact" as you claim. Fracking does not poison water either. Methane has been getting into water for decades long before fracking. If there is methane in your drinking water that is your water plant's fault. Fracking comes with risks, but so does driving. The risks are minute, especially when compared to the reward. You can either take the extreme route and ban it based off of nothing but fear mongering. Doing so will kill jobs and hurt the economy. Or you can allow fracking to happen accepting the risks are almost non-existence especially when proper regulations established at the local level are in place. But overall the fear mongering stories you are trying to bring up about fracking are unjustified.
    1
  10. +Pat Andler There are risks with fracking, but they are minimal and can be essentially avoided with local regulations (and not that many). The rewards of fracking are great. There are not horror stories related to fracking. Earthquakes happen, methane has been in drinking water for decades before fracking.
    1
  11. +john carlisle Earthquakes have been recorded in OK since 1918
    1
  12. +Pat Andler You are fear mongering. Things will be fine. We are progressing just fine.
    1
  13. +myrasmama I have done research, fracking has not done anything bad at all. I agree that we need to wean off of fossil fuels, but we can't use fear mongering in doing so.
    1
  14. Name me one right that straight people have but LGBTXYXABC people don't have.
    1
  15. +greenfireHD So you want special laws that cater specifically to trans? You do know that you can't assault, rob or murder a trans person like any one else.
    1
  16. +greenfireHD You can't murder anyone, sorry.
    1
  17. +greenfireHD That is called self defense.
    1
  18. +greenfireHD You are mixing the issue of self defense with the issue of trans gender people.
    1
  19. +Levity He said girlfriend.
    1
  20. You can do this the other way as well. That Bernie voter at the beginning listed three policies. The second one had no clue how the taxes would work. Just because they can say it in a more coherent way doesn't mean they are right. Remember that Bernie voter on Fox News on time?
    1
  21. +Adrian Betancourt Everyone already has equal rights
    1
  22. 20,000 views here, almost 150,000 views on Steven Crowder ripping on Bernie on this speech. Seems like the "revolution" is doing well.
    1
  23. A random new station that very few people know about asks a question to a politician on the street. And they wonder why he ignored them. He can't just answer every question that is given to him.
    1
  24. Bernie was an independent during his political career and was vocal about it. Now, as he runs for president, he claims he is a democrat and expects the party to just accept him. This is showing once again that Bernie and his supporters have a mental disability.
    1
  25. +Adrian Betancourt People use to make a living working on a farm. Technology killed those jobs. The economy evolves. It isn't my fault that Bernie supporters are economically illiterate.
    1
  26. +Giovanny Montez "He opposed every disastrous trade deal." How were they disastrous? " Trump is part of the problem, all his shit is made in china." So. "over the 170 economists that endorsed Bernie" To start, they endorse him on one issue. Next, that is a minute amount of economist, as in around 2-3%. So that 170 economists list is pretty much BS.
    1
  27. +Giovanny Montez Those trade deals allow for underdeveloped countries to get jobs which allows their economy to grow. If not they are prone to being overtaken by radical groups, like terrorists. We are a developed country. We should push people to take on higher skilled jobs like being a professor or a doctor so we can actually provide healthcare and college for more people. Bernie wants to provide it when we lack doctors and professors. But also wants those factory jobs to come back? So where are the professors and doctors going to come from? Actually I was wrong. According to the BLS there are 21,500 economists in the US. So 170 of them is less than 1%. Wall Street only plays a huge role due to it ties to the federal government. You solve that by reducing the fed, not expanding it.
    1
  28. +DanteAtomosKageokami When did any of these two Bernie supporters actually gave any insight on political matters? In the end all I heard was "free shit".
    1
  29. Bernie denies owning three homes (as in he won't comment on it) and earning millions off of his book he sold in Walmart.
    1
  30. Cruz did win. In the end he cornered Bernie into admitting that he will have to raise taxes on everyone. Cruz said how much Bernie's ideas will cost and Bernie never denied it. Cruz later said that Bernie does not want to cut taxes on small businesses but instead raise them and justify it by giving them a government check. Cruz said multiple times that Bernie has to raise taxes on everyone. Eventually the Denmark guy cornered Bernie to have him admit that Bernie has to raise taxes on everyone. The American people won't support that. It is also crazy to think that a nation that is $20 trillion in debt at the federal government will spend our money better than the people will. Bernie lost and became very angry in the end.
    1
  31. So the complete opposite of Bernie. Bernie does not understand collateral.
    1
  32. The moderators jumped in as the debate was about tax reform, not campaign reform. They were doing their job.
    1