General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike" (@Mike-hd7ko) on "'What Role Do Motives Play There?': Gorsuch Questions Jack Smith's Attorney In Trump Immunity Case" video.

He did want to be reelected lol
7
Thats literally their job lol
5
He campaigned for reelected. Thats literally how someone acts when they want to get reelected hahaha
4
@captpike6651 He hasn't broken any laws so how would he end up in jail?
3
@dennisg4053 There is no election interference, otherwise that would have been charged and prosecuted lol
3
@johnpyle8027 There is no corruption in in justice system. You're just biased
3
This is him getting justice
3
@ashleev4605 election disputes are to be handled in state courts. Not by calling and telling election officials to find you the exact number of votes you need to win. lol
3
This is false
2
@johnpyle8027 If someone is found to be corrupt they will be held accountable under the law just like everyone else. Whats the problem?
2
@pamgreen7178 Cant handle the truth eh?
2
@Gjkicker54 If they aren't activists than neither are any of the judges sitting on trumps cases
2
@ashleev4605 It doesn't matter if he was president or not. What he did was still illegal. Nobody is above the law
2
@voxmerus Him being president at the time literally makes no difference whatsoever
2
For example. Withholding aid funding in order to put pressure on a foreign to do personal political clear would be a clearly illegal act
2
@grey5751 The comment wasn't about the content in the video thats why lol
1
so we can blame all our problems on trump then. Got it
1
@dennisg4053 This is false. Stop lying
1
Would have to have some super strong evidence that the policy was being made for personal gain
1
@ashleev4605 Nothing about his actions were legal in anyway. Hence the charges
1
Impeachment is a political process. Has nothing to do with and has no impact on potential prosecution after leaving office.
1
doesn't mean either of those
1
@grey5751 My point was that you made a pointless comment, which you admitted to. Now im just wondering why. Its a simple question. lol
1
@grey5751 Him being president makes literally no difference. You understand that right?
1
@ashleev4605 Why would we put his illegal conversations aside?
1
@ashleev4605 Trump tried to get election officials to haut ballot counting, while he was still up, before all ballots were counted in an attempt to win lol. Why would we ignore that ?
1
@ashleev4605 the 12 amendment covers all candidates equally. It says "A candidate" It doesn't say "The sitting president". Understand the difference? This just proves my point that being president makes literally no difference.
1
@voxmerus There is no difference in what a president versus a presidential candidate is allowed to do. Thats the entire point lol The law is the same for everyone
1
@ashleev4605 there is no official act that allows a president to break the law lol
1
@ashleev4605 Obama hasn't broken any laws, except for living rent free in your head lol
1
@voxmerus If the conversations is ended its because I won and you lost. Cope
1
@LowKey_OP Biden is up for reelection, is he somehow not the sitting president?
1
@LowKey_OP You cant be up for REelection if you're not currently sitting in elected office. See how that works?
1
@grey5751 Still wont answer basic questions I see
1
@RajHK8 Just embarrassing yourself lol
1
@RajHK8 Why are you so triggered? Grow up
1
@RajHK8 Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling. I can see all three of your comment's.
1
@RajHK8 Oh so you admit you made posts. Catching your lies was too easy. Dont get upset with me because you dont know how to us the comment section properly. haha
1
Pardon powers can be questioned
1
If a POTUS ever tried to pardon themselves it would immediately trigger major court challenges that would end up before SCOTUS
1
@marcgarrett5427 There is no IF since we know for a fact they can be questioned
1
@marcgarrett5427 No president has tried to pardon themselves. So the legal question hasn't been answered. Thats what he means
1
@marcgarrett5427 But EVERYTHING can be challenged in court. Thats the entire point of our legal system
1
There is no election interference here
1
@grey5751 Cant answer my question eh? lol
1
@grey5751 Now you're trying to change the subject. I never said you couldn't whine. I asked WHY would you ask a pointless question lol
1
@grey5751 Why cant we make comments unrelated to the video? Is this not a free country?
1
@pamgreen7178 He never said Gorsuch was on the bence when we got bush. Read more carefully lol
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd In what way do you think im wrong?
1
@Saladin.aslan7168 This is false
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd When has any democrat called an election official and asked them to find the exact amount of votes they need to change the outcome of the election? Specifically.
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd Since when did asking state officials to find votes so you can try and change the results of an election you lost not been a crime?
1
@grey5751 Why would you ask a pointless question of you already knew the answer?
1
@dennisg4053 Fulton country hasn't said anything close to that. There were no invalid ballots Even the cyber ninja's had to admit sleepy don lost GA.
1
@dennisg4053 Fulton country hasn't said anything such thing. Why are you lying?
1
@dennisg4053 Even the cyber ninjas had to admin sleep don lost GA haha
1
@dennisg4053 You just cant cope the fact you lost another free and fair election
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd All votes had been counted at that point. So why was he asking for votes he knew didn't actually exist?
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd Show evidence that dems "routinely "find" uncounted votes". Lets see it
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd You just cant handle the fact you lost a free and fair election
1
@MichaelSheffield-ox8yd The decision is only going to go one way. That ge has no immunity to break the law. prepare yourself
1
@MamaMC4950 Courts aren't assuming anything. They are ruling based on the evidence and facts. So Whats the problem?
1
@MamaMC4950 You clearly have no idea what you're talking about
1
We have no lords in this country
1
Democrats didn't fail to impeach him. We failed to convict him. Two different things
1
Trump was impeached twice. But was also acquitted twice. But the impeachment itself still stands
1
@cleenlivin Garland has nothing to do with impeachment. Stop deflecting
1
@cleenlivin Colorado courts never tried changes whatsoever. That was a civil issue, brought by state attorneys. Big difference Please educate yourself hahaha
1
@cleenlivin No they didn't. They followed the normal legal process. Please educate yourself
1
@cleenlivin The Colorado Supreme court had a trial. Thats what courts do hahaha
1
@cleenlivin Jack smith doesn't have anything to do with impeachment either. I don't think you understand what impeachment is. hahaha
1
@cleenlivin The whole country watch all three Colorado trials as it went through the appeals system last year. You're not fooling anyone
1
How dont you know how YT works?
1
You say that about every court that doesn't automatically side with trump lol
1
@dennisg4053 Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling?
1
What about it?
1
@grey5751 So you agree you had a completely meaningless point. Thanks
1
The argument is nobody is immune from criminal acts. Nobody is above the law
1
@grey5751 So you admit you dont actually have a substantive point. Got it
1
@captpike6651 If you could of impeached him republicans would have done it by now. lol
1
Obama, Bush, Clinton, biden haven't broken any laws
1
Presidents dont have immunity. That would make them dictators and thats not what we do here in america
1
@dianneferraro7969 Dont break the law and you wont be taken to court. Its that simple. You cant take someone to court "for no reasion" lol
1
You dont even know what treason is
1