General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike" (@Mike-hd7ko) on "BREAKING: President Trump Announces $100 Billion TSMC Investment In The US, Takes Reporter Questions" video.

@ryancomer6290 Tim Ryan. I already addressed this question. Keep up lol
1
@tongpoo8985 TSMC press statement "With a total price tag of $165 billion, TSMC's Phoenix commitment represents the largest foreign direct investment in U.S. history, according to the company." "The Biden administration finalized this and a $6.6 billion grant agreement with TSMC last November as part of the CHIPS and Science Act"
1
@ryancomer6290 Its correct. You clearly didn't check lol
1
@ryancomer6290 Notice how you cant name a single republican cosponsor 😂
1
@ryancomer6290 So after all this time you finally admit that it was democrats who passed the bill, not even ONE republican cosponsor. I was right the entire time, you just didn't want to admit it. hahaha
1
@ The question was "Who passed the Chips act?" The answer, is as you just admitted, Democrats. Without any republican cosponsors
1
@ryancomer6290 John Corryns bill was crushed by his own party. Couldn't even get it out of the first committee! hahahaha
1
@ryancomer6290 the house was controlled by republicans 2020 btw. Educate yourself
1
@ryancomer6290 Still cant handle the fact that I easily proved you wrong eh?
1
@ The question was "Who passed the Chips act?" The answer is, as you just admitted, Democrats. Without any republican cosponsors. Cope
1
@ except im not wrong.
1
@ Republicans controlled the house in 2020. I said this already. Reading comprehension your strong suit
1
@ The question was "Who passed the Chips act?" The answer is, as you just admitted, Democrats. Without any republican cosponsors. Cope
1
@ The question was "Who passed the Chips act?" The answer is, as you just admitted, Democrats. Without any republican cosponsors. Cope
1
@markhill4700 Im not replying to you. But you will still get the notification
1
@ The question was "Who passed the Chips act?" The answer is, as you just admitted, Democrats. Without any republican cosponsors. Cope
1
@ You even said yourself, "a totally different act". So it sounds like republicans one again failed to do something. While dems delivered. Class dismissed
1
@ryancomer6290 Name one R listed as cosponsor with Tim Ryan. You cant.
1
@ I asked you to name one R cosponsor of the Chips and science at and you still cant some up with one. Because none of them did. hahahahaha
1
@ Except what you said is not true.
1
@ You're literally just making stuff up and you have no supporting evidence to prove it with. You just cant handle the fact that I so easily proved you right that it was dems who wrote and passed the chips act without any republican cosponsor. Learn how to cope
1
@ You're literally just making stuff up and you have no supporting evidence to prove it with. You just cant handle the fact that I so easily proved you right that it was dems who wrote and passed the chips act without any republican cosponsor. cope
1
@ John Corryns bill never even got to the house, which was under GOP control at the time. The fact you dont even know that much proves how clueless you are hahaha
1
@ You're literally just making stuff up to deflect from the fact that this is just another JB accomplishment. Cope
1
@ No it wasn't. Why are you lying and who do you think you're fooling? Embarrassing yourself
1
@ryancomer6290 You just cant admit when you're wrong. You taking the L today regardless. Sorry
1
@ Still cant admit that you were wrong on all points eh? Enjoy your L!
1
@ Funny how when you read the bills they aren't anything alike. But you wouldn't know anything about that. Enjoy your L!
1
@ryancomer6290 Schooling you was too easy! hahahaha
1
@Still trying to deflect from the fact that, as you admitted, democrats wrote and passed the chips act. Without any republican cosponsors. Enjoy your L!
1
@ryancomer6290 The GOP had control of the senate. How dont you know that? Corryns bill never even got to the house. Embarrassing yourself
1
Schooling you was too easy! Enjoy your L! hahahaha
1
@ Still cant handle that L you took eh? lol
1
@tongpoo8985 now thanks to the CHIPs act they are investing another 100b according to the CEO. What dont you understand about that?
1
@tongpoo8985 Its literally been happening over the last 3 years, as you just admitted. This is just a continuation of whats been happening over the last 3 years. Sorry
1
@tongpoo8985 trump is just trying to steal credit again
1
@tongpoo8985 Taiwan has no competition for starters lol
1
@ You just admitted that thanks to the chips act TSMC is investing another 100b. Just as there CEO said lol
1
@ 40b before the chips act. 165 billion after the chips act. Thanks JB!
1
@ Its correct
1
@ intel get all their chip parts from TSMC. Educate yourself lol
1
@ Samsung would be under the same tariffs soooo
1
@ The US has no alternatives to turn to. Nobody else would be able meet the demand if we stopped importing from TSMC
1
@ actually its 165 billion since the passaging of the chips act, as you just admitted
1
@ the 100 billion is not sudden, its been in the works for 6 months lol
1
@ Tariffs would be on on semiconductors in general so it doesn't matter what country, and this doesn't change the fact that Samsoung cant make up the demand lol
1
@ Now you're just making stuff up
1
@ he specifically threatened tariffs on all semiconductors. But it literally doesn't matter as tariffs have nothing to do with this. The Chip act does. Educate yourself
1
@ Taiwanese manufacturers wouldn't have any disadvantage whatsoever. The US would have no choice but to continue to import from Taiwan as nobody has the supply to meet our demand. How dont you understand that?
1
@ the 100 billion is after the chips act, there for under the chips act its not 165 billion. You just dont want to give JB the credit he is due
1
@ The function of the chips act is to incentive investment, like the 165b from TSMC. I bet you haven't even read it lol
1
@ tariffs are a punishment on US consumers, not the TSMC. We have literally no other choice but to continue to import from which will just serve to increase prices on Americans.
1
@ I didn't say overnight, I said it would take us nearly 10 years to scale up domestic production. Try again
1
@ Those are literally two quotes from the same presser. How are they unrelated?
1
@ Funny how you skipped over the fact that TSMC has directly acknowledged that the new 100b is an expansion of the 65 billion due to the CHIPS act lol
1
@ Trump hasn't done anything so why would I give him credit? This was going to happen regardless of trump.
1
@ 100% tariffs on Taiwan just means prices in the US go up 100% as there is no alternative source for the ships. How dont you understand that?
1
@ TSMC only has one competitor and they dont have the supply to take any of TSMCs marketspace away no matter how high tariffs are. Educate yourself
1
@ It would take a decade to scale up domestic production. This is what I mean when I say you dont have any idea what you're talking about lol
1
@ Your bias for trump is preventing you from seeing the truth. Embarrassing yourself
1
@ Me made the threats. Just nobody cares about his threats. Sorry
1
@ You think Samsung has the production capacity to replace TSMCs imports? Lets see a source on that. Embarrassing yourself
1
@ You talk about scaling up domestically but you dont realize that will take a decade. Thats not realistic. Economics 101
1
@ You clearly haven't taken any econ courses as you're clearly just making everything up at this point
1
@ Samsung and Intel dont have anywhere close to the production ability to take TSMCs marketspace. You're living in a fantasy world. Educate yourself
1
@ Funny how you skipped over the fact that TSMC has directly acknowledged that the new 100b is an expansion of the 65 billion due to the CHIPS act lol
1
@ So then you admit that you're argument is wrong and they cant replace TSMCs market share. Therefor we would continue to import from TSMC for a decade to come with massive price increases for US consumers.
1
@ You were referring to a totally different act. One that failed to even get out of committee. Proving my point that it was dems who passed the chips act without any republican cosponsor. Class dismissed
1