Comments by "Ungoogleable o_O" (@oO_ox_O) on "Атеизм 2.0" video.

  1. @cristianfcao I personally wouldn't want someone to just become an atheist for the sake of being it, in fact, if someone uses rational thinking and at first comes to the conclusion of let's say that it might be smarter to be a deist/pantheist than an Pentecostal Christian or Wahabi Muslim or therelike then I am not sure whether I wouldn't feel happier for latter person.
    1
  2. @PR0H0LDEM I argue that it is no more reasonable to believe in god than in the tooth fairy because there is no good evidence, so in that regard they are the same.
    1
  3. @PR0H0LDEM The main function of a church is to teach the believes of a religion and organise certain rites. That's "only goodness coming from churches/mosques/temples/shrines"?
    1
  4. @classified9425 general ethics class?
    1
  5. @PR0H0LDEM Because you are a social person. Culture but also intuition tells us that we need to be social to fellow human beings to a certain degree, it probably has proven to be the best way to go.
    1
  6. @gotohellgooglization in fact I believe quite some modern "religious" people do that
    1
  7. @aceldama99 write a paper
    1
  8. @Shanawolfo1 "Voltaire, our saint!"? Just wondering, what would be the best IYHO?
    1
  9. @PR0H0LDEM You mean a claim of genuine truth? But that would be wrong claim.
    1
  10. @Geebsee Could have just said "religion is a meme!" ;-)
    1
  11. @MrMichaelEdie envy ;-)
    1
  12. @tdurran well, he had buddies like Engels
    1
  13. @BCsJonathanTM Not worse than Twitter?
    1
  14. @classified9425 trollololololo
    1
  15. @699backstab 0/10 try again troll
    1
  16. @Amemet1 you know the religious preference of what percentage of people you come in contact?
    1
  17. @PR0H0LDEM Well, if you can search an infinite size (at once) then an infinitive sized room would be OK too I guess. Don't you see that I was trying to make an analogy? ( you could replace the tooth fairy for anything else absurd) Why is the one thing absurd to you while the other similar thing isn't? Did you really made up your mind from the beginning, god = plausible, tooth fairy = absurd and by this you say that there is a 50% chance for god while none for the absurd thing?
    1
  18. @MsNimpnimp What would be there for upgrade on the "absence of believe in a god"?
    1
  19. @PR0H0LDEM I don't, that's why I said "to some extend".
    1
  20. The Sturm & Drang of "Atheism"?
    1
  21. @bozolazic I don't get it?
    1
  22. @YawnGod I miss the stars too.
    1
  23. @Strand0410 He certainly didn't show any "humility" when naming it "Atheism 2.0" thereby widening the definition of atheism in an absurd way and some of his statements you see often quoted here in this comments section. I wonder if that was on purpose to make some uproar like a marketing trick, after all the ideas presented by him here aren't new, just maybe not well known.
    1
  24. @apocaRUFF Woha, seems like you live in quite a different culture than I do, is it also true that people in the US would talk about money before and during meal? How uncanny! ;-)
    1
  25. @KemaTheAtheist Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Because it's good and fascinating! Now sing with me…
    1
  26. @FruitsP "or being told they were no perfect. " Huh? What do mean? That there is the perception that atheists are atheists because they want to see themselves as perfect? First time I would hear that.
    1
  27. @PR0H0LDEM But again, you have ignored my critisim of your unfounded statistics claim, you said believing in god is about as reasonable as not believing in it (50% chance you said, so the odds are the same), why is that any less true for the tooth fairy, after all it can't be proven nor disproven the same.
    1
  28. @PR0H0LDEM I didn't say he has a limit, in fact didn't I tell you (not sure if that was you or something else) that god in the idea of an omnipotent being is basically pantheism because he would be basically in control of everything thereby it would make not difference where god "starts" and where he "ends".
    1
  29. @classified9425 we are also social creatures, no denying in that too, e.g. we don't need corresponding upbringing to consider killing each other as something that isn't totally right
    1
  30. @saadazzz Learn about Zeus please!
    1
  31. @iYuumei If there is something you don't believe that it exists, would you go the relativistic part and say "I believe X might not exist."? X be anything, including the tooth fairy, easter bunny, aliens from the star trek universe, something even more absurd…
    1
  32. @eydos Atheism is the new hippy? :-D
    1
  33. @pboisei problem is that some religions might ask for unconditional belief which this goes against
    1
  34. @angelwhite maybe, but not as organised as today's world religions
    1
  35. @yamanito stem cells
    1
  36. @FotoKadr Proving a negative is hard indeed, I guess you also couldn't prove that the tooth fairy does not exist, what do you think would be the probability that the tooth fairy exists?
    1
  37. @Canterwoodcore this one comes into my quote collection
    1
  38. @FotoKadr Indeed, defining absolute evil would be hard, but what you are talking about would be defining blameworthiness/culpability, still I feel like you ignored my question, what sense does it make to define as god as having a certain limit to where it is while believing it's an omnipotent/omniscient being.
    1
  39. @BleueDeLaRue Redefinition of "atheism", some of his statements, …?
    1
  40. @TKDdans There is already universal ethics standards, there is ethics classes and other subject that imply that like history.
    1
  41. @eatcarpet No, sol invictus is.
    1
  42. @BleueDeLaRue Oh, and also that he is selling something old as new and his own invention.
    1
  43. @Vixref Atheism 2.0 rule #42: thou shall go early to bed so he can think about his choices!" like this?
    1
  44. @FotoKadr With notion you mean it's the postulate/premise you base your opinions on? I guess you also believe god created everything and is in control of everything (has omnipotence) and knows everything (omniscience), then what difference would it make to say that then god is basically also everything which would also include the non-goodness things?
    1
  45. @classified9425 not solely, we are also social creatures
    1
  46. @PR0H0LDEM Oops. :D
    1
  47. @NekoMouser Don't you know? Odd numbers are unstable!
    1
  48. @SanghaOnline Yeah, just like those nifty non-easter-bunny believers ignorant as hell, making fun of my beliefs.
    1
  49. @bukroot His word? You mean Allah's? SCNR
    1
  50. @cristianfcao "(except perhaps critical thinking and skepticism?)" No, the definition of atheist allows the absence of both these things, e.g. you can still believe in planet Nairu hiding behind the sun and aliens being among people.
    1
  51. @slatslatslats Aren't you stretching the term "religion" a bit?
    1
  52. @PR0H0LDEM Theoretically it is possible, say you have hermetically sealed room of finite size, then you can look at all places to see that a certain thing is not there, thereby proving that does not exist, nobody has yet looked at all corners of the universe to check whether the tooth fairy isn't there so nobody has proven that the tooth fairy does not exist.
    1
  53. @rogan71 Sooo true, that's what I said to those people who made fun of me when I told them that I sincerely believe in the easter bunny!!!!
    1
  54. @Amemet1 Can you really claim to know most, or that you know for sure what portion of people you met where atheists before you formed this opinion?
    1
  55. @guylfe Could it fit any better or worse? How effect does the believe in a deist god have in you?
    1
  56. @Darcsied27 The definition of atheism would still allow you to be for complete control of everyone. ;-)
    1
  57. @sexyloser Maybe it is upsetting to some that someone might even propose that some of these things might be necessary, because "people are this way".
    1
  58. @apocaRUFF Most atheists that introduce themselves as atheists to you or that you assumed to be atheists?
    1
  59. @frostyuk2007 the Sophists?
    1
  60. @GeekProdigyGuy I have lectures punctuated with a Q.E.D. ;-)
    1
  61. @MrJaiLeeworthy When is he suggesting that? I see just a pragmatic approach to his idea of a future culture he calls "Atheism 2.0"
    1
  62. @apocaRUFF You know all the atheist of the people you were in contact with? You know most atheists in general?
    1
  63. @PR0H0LDEM And the notion of god is pure goodness? I still don't get what you meant with pure goodness.
    1
  64. @tommy605 Heh, IT personnel, just that you didn't come up with "assburgers". ;-)
    1