Comments by "Wolfs Winkel" (@wolfswinkel8906) on "NATO Can't Be A Party To Ukraine War: Erdogan, Slovak PM Warns Of WW3, Biden Claims European Support" video.

its not about unity but a protest on the hijack of their alliance. Erdogan and Orban remember why the alliance was formed and what it was supposed to defend them from. They also know how these tensions were cultivated to reach where we are today. They have their rights to disagree with your opinion.
5
@ryanspinoza6586 that's a simpleminded way of looking at it.
3
@BrendanPowel if there are no consequences for Netanyahu grabbing land and ethnic cleaning Gaza under cover of a false flag, there should be no consequences for Russian invasion of Ukraine to render them ineligible for NATO expansionism. Cope and seethe.
2
@andybassman104 "invaders" is a label. We know how the tensions developed so don't act brand new.
2
@BrendanPowel don't talk about consequences when the US can kill 3 million civilians based on false pretences and their underling Israel can do the same and grab land without those same consequences.
1
@andybassman104 I have no idea what you're on about. My point is Russia has allies and if they intervene it's to be expected.
1
@ryanspinoza6586 no, I said simple minded. Meaning a very superficial perspective lacking in context, nuance and specifics that could alter the moral factors lined up in favor of Ukraine. Don't put words in my mouth. Get it straight, get it clear.
1
@Northman-from-the-North the West has been sending weapons to Ukraine since 2015 and Iran only just sent the first shipment of Shaheds in 2023. That's mischievous of you to mix up the chronology like that. Shame.
1
@ryanspinoza6586 no I don't think the premise is flawed. Because given the depth of my own research into the causes of this war after having listened to both sides carefully, I have come to the conclusion that Russia acted in what they believe (and anyone else who understands what being in NATO means) was self defense. And that's why I disagree with you that Russia is the aggressor in this conflict even though they took the initiative of waging a conventional war, they were responding to aggression of an asymmetrical nature which most people (probably including you) are not prepared to label as such.
1
@NeonRaveHuskey personally i cannot blame Russia for their reaction to the steps that were taken by NATO. Trying to blame Russia for the response and not blaming the act that led to the response is hypocrisy, and is hard to accept it.
1
@jamesfe5 jealous of what?
1
@raidenj1295 those are not the people making the decisions, obviously. What the heck was that for?
1