Comments by "Wolfs Winkel" (@wolfswinkel8906) on "Ex CIA Agent: Why Israel and Ukraine Can’t Win - Andrew Bustamante" video.

@busking6292 well the 40-mile long convoy of tanks outside Kyiv didn't even fire a shot. If you also consider the fact that Erdogan was in talks with Putin and Zelensky in Ankara working on a deal, then its probably right that Russia was trying to force Ukraine to honor the Minsk Accords as stressed by Putin in Munich the week prior. If Russia wanted to take over, that 40 mile convoy would have walked in guns blazing, and the FAB bombs we see today would have levelled Kyiv. I hope you realize this guy has been correct about ukraine since over a year ago.
41
@ahimel so they all ran out of gas at the same time in a single file, at exactly 24 miles, 4 miles outside the range of Grad MLRS systems WHILE negotiations were going on? My IQ won't let me agree that such a series of multiple coincidences is possible. Maybe yours can.
32
@leonidfro8302 facts are such uncomfortable, pesky lil things that never go away.
13
@ahimel they gave what? And Kherson was several months after the failed negotiations in Ankara and Istanbul... What's your point exactly? You seem like you're trying to roast me without acknowledging Bustamante was right about Russian military potential over a year ago. It's not about me, but the facts. And the Russians have completed not one but TWO rail lines through the land bridge through Volnovakha down to Zaporizhzhia. This is not the time for cope.
8
@kyosokutai because tank tracks don't work off-road anymore. Isn't that right, genius? 🤡👈🏻😂
5
Facts are such uncomfortable things. Especially when told by a guy with hair like that
4
Same way we had several of them talking on DW and Sky in the early days of the war offering their "expert analysis" (which turned out to be mostly wrong)
3
@braveheart4603 were you not listening? Bustamante destroyed KK with so much facts that he agreed with him in the end check: 1:12:00. KK conceded the fact that neutrality for Ukraine was better than joining NATO which Putin repeatedly stressed was a red line for Russia. So the invasion was not "unprovoked" clearly Russia had concerns that NATO refused to address. You cannot argue against a superior argument.
2
@kyosokutai you must be a special kind of mentally challenged if you think tanks and mobile artillery with TRAWLER TRACKS can't go off road and around the ones in front supposedly "out of fuel". Jeez, education standards are in the toilet in your country
1
@kyosokutai you must be a special kind of ret'arded if you think the trawler tracks on tanks and mobile artillery are for decoration and cannot help them go completely off road around the ones in the front supposedly "out of fuel". Education standards in your country must be absolutely totaled, third world style.
1
@kyosokutai you must be a special kind of daft if you think the trawler tracks on tanks and mobile artillery are for decoration and cannot help them go completely off road around the ones in the front supposedly "out of fuel". Education standards in your country must be absolutely totaled, third world style.
1
@kyosokutai you must be a special kind of daft if you think the tracks on tanks and mobile artillery are for decoration and cannot help them go completely off road around the ones in the front supposedly "out of fuel". Education standards in your country must be absolutely totaled, third world style.
1
@leonidfro8302 but the truth they tell never does go away. For example, if I tell you that Russia claimed more land in Kharkiv in 2 weeks than the Ukrainian counteroffensive of 2023, and my YouTube account gets deleted, Russia's gains won't magically disappear. Cope is not a substitute for reality.
1
@cheguevararevolutionair852 today's kids never experienced any wars, and they've been able to accomplish so much in virtual spaces that they now think they're invincible as well.
1
@braveheart4603 oh, you are absolutely correct. 💯.
1