Comments by "gacj2010" (@gacj2010) on "Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman fired by National Security Council" video.

  1. TREASON AGAINST his COMMANDER
    22
  2. Oh I wished I could have seen him weeping
    13
  3.  @football5964  HE vindicted Trump saying he just thought Trump was not following the established policy ...Well Excuse ME ...!!! I didnt know the pres worked for you?
    3
  4.  Mike  All appointed workers on the presidents staff work at the pleasure of the president.
    3
  5. NA NA NA NA ...NA NA NA NA ...HEY HEY HEY ...GOODBYE
    2
  6. Vindman SUBVERTED    the president
    2
  7.  @FlightX101  Not accurate ...It was Vindman who had poblems with the elected president's foreign policy and thought he knew best ...egged on by the Resiatance ..So he repeated his interpretation to Eric Charamella , the (so called leaker ) who i fact was not a leaker as he heard 2nd hand information from Charamella.. who went to Schiff who later involved the Inspector General and then Schiff started impeachment and months later and millions of dollars spent for nothing...This is the chronology. When Trump released the transcripts it blew their whole plot... Vindman was reduced to admit that the transcripts were accurate for a few prepositions and that Trump wasn'tfollowing the established policy. Excuse me ???....HE was part of the resistance of undercutting the commander and chief ..like him or not..It is palace treason. If Vindman was in turmoil then QUIT and go to the media.... no he remained as a rat
    2
  8.  j c  No favor was granted and the aid was delivered. even if it was thought by these opinion "witnesses" When does America prosecute for Thought Crimes...The details are important here BLURRED by fake media..
    2
  9.  @margritkaminsky1470  You seem to shout out things you make up ...Subpoenas arent squelched... they are rejected or accepted and when rejected , the option for the sender is to go to court to have them enforced. Schiff knew it wouldn't hold so didnt do that but wanted to talk to people who dont understand...and since he has media on his side ... (but thats changed)
    2
  10. Yup .... I think it was he who told it to Eric Charamella , the so called whistleblower , who then told it to Schiff
    1
  11.  @margritkaminsky1470  No the oath of loyalty is to the constitution and the commander and chief... Not to BIPARTISANSHIP ... where did you get that one????
    1
  12.  @margritkaminsky1470  Why are you making up oaths to impartiality .....Policy in our government is always from the PARTY elected... and these policies are always different
    1
  13.  @margritkaminsky1470  NO again ... It was about the last election 2016 where Ukraine and Russia out dirt on Trump (POLITICO ARTICLE JAN 2017)..or is it because the perpetrator (Biden) is in the process of running for the nomination of his party ... he is immune from the LAW.... that woul dbe great to all lawbreakers..just run for something .....You are being owned by lefty media and making a fool of yourself because they arent asked these questions that even I could out them with.
    1
  14.  @fredbretz7703  HE did know ...........
    1
  15.  M P  So far its been Trump 100 to the RESISTANCE 0.............All wasting money and time when Trump would work with them to do better drug prices and roads and bridges BUT no,they hate so much ...because they lost to a non politician ...Cant you see that ..media and DEMS are one in the same and they are playing you
    1
  16.  @Arsmortis7  ITs the way all things are judged....
    1
  17.  @uninspired3681  Vindman acquitted Trump in his testimony ...just didnt like the way the new pres was doing things ...Well Excuse me!!!
    1