Comments by "gacj2010" (@gacj2010) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
11
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mpg2495 So where you ask , I will poiint you to an article written by Nancy Pelosi's biographer. She hates Trump. She wrote an article in TIME magazine Feb ,2021. You can google it right now ... Its free on line. Her name is Molly Ball. You may have seen her on the talk shows, especially Washington Week. The article is titled something like HOW THE DEMOCRATS SAVED THE ELECTION 2020 or something like that. ITs not long at all but it roadmaps all the changes done starting the summer before , to voting laws in the swing states. The dems took the republicans by surprise.If you check it out , you will understand better why some felt so strongly about the election results. Remember Biden beat Trump by a mere 40,000 votes in these swing states, and for that matter, it was only in a few key cities. Remember also that ONLY STATE LEGISLATURES, not state supreme courts, governors , secretary of states can implement election law changes in a state.
If you do read it , you will have a greater picture of things and Id love to hear from you again. Molly Ball calls it a cabal , but does so proudly. ...Read it ...
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mpg2495 No , I am the type that I accept the results of our election. I know this hasn't been the norm for the last 4 years , but I am not that kind of Democrat. What is decided upon is that. There is always another time if things don'r pan out. You must agree...
But more important , I was thinking about my plan last night and couldnt even get to sleep easily. The plan to influence corporations to sell to our government.The plan to eliminate excess capitol in the hands of a few, and unemployment would be at 0%. There would be a job for everyone.
I thought how some might not like this idea. The ones who still cling to the idea to rise higher than others. They should not need this because in this new world , everyone will be provided with what they need. Excess is not a necessity to live . People like Trump. Biden Pelosi , Kerry, Sanders and most of them don't need to have multiple homes or residences. So I thought more on it. Although there would be a huge reduction in crime as no one would need anything and no one would have anything different from another, and we would need no police, I thought we must have a special force of police as it may take some time for some of the people to accept this equatable new way. They have been so used to focusing on some Dream and trying to reach it by rising above others, that they may need to be taught that this idea is wrong. Some of these people may in fact need to be re instructed and with peer pressure , be corrected. In this I thought we may have to limit the people's access to ideas from outside that could erode the unity. We may also have to see and check what our media is saying or our entertainment is producing or our authors are writing. It could be corruptible. We would need to control what is out there. We might also have to consider where our people can travel outside our country . They could get ideas. Some would think they know better what's best for them , when in fact we know what's best for them ; they just don't understand.
So back to your proposal of possibly 45%corporate tax..... I don't think it would accomplish my plan , but is moving in the right direction , anyway. It may close a few of them down , but I fear those would move to another country , if we let them.
Any points how the 45% would work better than 95?
Would like to hear your thoughts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mpg2495 Hmm. your views are more like what we have ...but toned down a little, but also a little like my design. I like the statement .."support a society made of citizens all over the world".My idea would be best when it was accepted all over the world so every country would be similar in ease of living; equal everywhere.
It would be hard to go half way, although your thought takes the edge off of things . and moves closer to my design.
Your info about some shithole places reminded me of what my car repair man , originally from Macow , China said to me when I asked what I often ask to 1st generation immigrants who I favor as some of the best American citizens. I asked him what do you see as a big difference in Americans and Macow residents? He said Americans are very kind and generous ... I asked ,how? He gave me the example of a stranded motorist. He said in his country another motorist is more likely to pass by , and its expected, but in America , people will stop to help. this was just one example. I apologized for his countrymen , saying it was perhaps because they were too busy trying to keep their heads above water ....same conclusion you reached about such countries... I heard once Americans are the most giving , personally ,to people in distress. Hope its so. Seems so from your experience and my repair man. That's good. Perhaps its from American's prosperity. Guess some excess gets distributed voluntarily. One can't give if they don't have a little extra.
In any case, we are not far from each other wanting best for all. My proposal would have been mandated by those who know whats best for the masses , and yours is more about natural falling together with less mandating. My idea doesn't allow vast accumulations of wealth...but my plan my be corrupted by those who conduct it, who would somehow mass wealth and we never do get to total equality, but it sounds good on paper.
At this point I have great respect for you after hearing that that you spent six years in the armed services and I did not. I understand you too love America .
Its been a pleasure and educating ,responding to you and vice versa.
I think we will be all right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1