Comments by "Stargazer ELITE " (@stargazer-elite) on "Artur Rehi" channel.

⁠ @sleepyjoe7843 1. Stop that whataboutisam 2. 3 times? What are you talking about it was only once in WW2 and even then they couldn’t have done it without American lend lease as stated by Stalin himself
2
@sleepyjoe7843 that is literally whataboutisam OP was talking about how Poland had Concord Moscow and then other comments were talking about how Napoleon did then you replied with how Russia conquered Paris or Berlin supposedly three time that is the definition of whataboutisam
2
@MariyanValkov-ts6mo article 5 isn’t initiated automatically it’s some thing the country that is being attacked has a choice to activate or not has been given at least four chances to do so, and nave declined each time Poland has been given a chance to do it they declined it is not a joke the US activated it after 9/11 and sent the terrorist, running back to Afghanistan, which they hid in the mountains, like the cowards, they are eventually the US got bored and left, and the new government surrendered immediately, because they too are cowards
1
@Bird_McBride Ukraine is beating Russia easily with NATO equipment. If Russia was as powerful as you say they were they would have captured Ukraine’s capital in three days like they planned to but they didn’t. It has been far longer than your “3 days special military operation” but they are still struggling not because of Russia’s power, but because they themselves were underpowered, they were not prepared for an invasion and why would they need to be prepared? They thought they could trust Russia, when they agreed to not attack Ukraine in exchange for the old Soviet nukes
1
@RatusPretentious they never said that Napoleon burned it down
1
I highly doubt Vladolf Putler wants to attack NATO he’s struggling with just Ukraine if he did that Russia would cease to exist
1