Comments by "Stargazer ELITE " (@stargazer-elite) on "A new Trump "resistance" isn't going to cut it this time" video.

The doomsday preppers don’t look so crazy nowadays
41
@Jay-fl5pl those tax cuts were only for the rich. In fact, he increased the tax rate on the lower classes.
7
@Jay-fl5pl he’s went bankrupt 6 times. 3 of which were casinos that is not a “good economic record”
6
Search up “the two Santa Claus’s“ that’s basically been the Republicans strategy for around 40 years maybe a bit more they do the horrible things they want to do and then they cry like babies blaming their horrible things when they transfer over to the Democratic person that is voted in because of the horrible things We need to scream about the economy as loud as possible, just like they did use their strategy against them give them a taste of their own medicine
2
@Jay-fl5pl his “patchy” economic records as a “businessman” are entirely relevant because that was part of what he was campaigning on all three times he was on the campaign trail was that he was “a great businessman“
2
He did not get a landslide. He did not get a mandate. He didn’t even get 50% of the popular vote enough. And don’t give us that BS that she was worse than Trump. Trump said he was going to be a dictator all the evidence points towards it and he supports other dictators as well and even if the checks and balances do somehow hold after he destroyed many of them, even if he can’t become a dictator , he will destroy this country with his “policies“ a.k.a. mass deportations, tariffs and other horrible economic plans
2
You do realize that most if not, all communist ideologies hate religion, right? Religion was banned in the USSR and every other communist nation.
2
That’s assuming that the 22nd amendment isn’t abolished by Trump somehow within only four years usually that takes a long time but he’s cheated in the past because he seems to be the perfect counter to any women running for office but then again women haven’t ran for president in a major party much anyway My point is, I don’t think the Democrats would want to risk running a female candidate again for a while. I am not misogynistic. I would support it whether they do or not but looking at it from their perspective, I can see why considering both times Trump one was because a woman was running , thanks to the fact that he has fueled his campaign through hate
1
You’re absolutely right
1
@FadeintotheShadows the Democrats do support that second amendment they always have but they just want to regulate who can have guns so that way crazy people can’t get them
1
Assuming he was even the real guy Luigi Mangione showed us what we need to do. We are being backed into a corner and when an animal was trapped into a corner… They fight back how do we expect to win when the opposing side doesn’t abide by the same rules and laws that we do? When justice is clearly not blind how do we expect to defend ourselves? Multiple former US presidents have said it and implied it. It’s literally the reason our country exists and in fact it’s in the declaration of independence. You know where I’m going with this, but for legal reasons, I can’t say the rest of this and besides, I don’t want it to resort to that and that part isn’t for legal reasons I genuinely hope it doesn’t have to come to that
1