Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "Trump says he wants to go ahead with second TV debate despite Covid illness - BBC News" video.
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@earthdweller5136 "Reputation" with, Serbia, Kosovo, UAE, Turkey, Iran, Bahrain, Mexico, Boris Johnson UK, we sent PPE to EU countries and they don't like us because of Trump, sounds odd. "Kid", been there, done that, on my way out, it's all yours "kid".
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marieiles8324 We elected a non politician, an amatuer, someone no one expected would, or could win, me included. We were all shocked in 2016. I have since learned two things. 1) The Clinton campaign engaged in dirty politics, the Obama administration was informed, and then colluded with the intelligence community to try and impeach the newly elected President. It was a soft-coup. I think Obama and others really believed Trump was a threat, and were doing their duty, but they broke the law, and violated their oaths of office. 2) I learned that Trump kept his promises to the people who voted for him. He is the same person he was before the election, however flawed, and no matter how many silly lies he tells the press, he has acted on good principals in the world and got a lot of good things accomplished. I never paid attention to Trump the celebrity, did not vote for him in 2016, but my party, the Democrats, have not played fair with him for 4 years, their lies are much more substantial than the fantasies he tells the press, and so I will vote for him in 2020. He is not the monster everyone says, he is no Hitler, a clown, yes, a buffoon at times, yes, but not a clear and present danger to America, or the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AppraisersOffice I'm in no way part of the radical right, at least by what I imagine your definition is. I am a registered Dem in California. 10Xs the Executive was held by one party and the Senate was held by a different party. NINE of those TEN nominees were rejected by the Senate, just like Garland was rejected. Your complaint is not valid. Trump may lose, but may win, if he holds FL and PA, then wins 2 out of 3 of these, which he won in 2016, WI, MI, NC, he wins a 2nd term. It's razor close, again, which in and of itself is a remarkable accomplishment for Trump.
1
-
1
-
@AppraisersOffice Just what the polls said 2016, I agree it will be tight this year AZ will be Blue, but he does not need it to win, and he may flip NV. I'm being realistic, he gets FL and PA, with 2 of these 3, WI, MI, NC, he's got it, and the map will look almost exactly like 2016. Just look https://www.270towin.com/maps/bRgO6.png
1
-
@AppraisersOffice No, that gif was not the prediction, it was actual. Even though Biden is slightly ahead in popular vote, it still comes down to FL, PA, and 2 of these 3, WI, MI, NC, and not state popular vote, but by county. Just count for yourself. Tight, so tight no one believes we will know the outcome until weeks afterward.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1