Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "The 'House didn't do their homework' in impeachment inquiry: Sen. James Lankford | ABC News" video.

I would not participate, either, in a sham. Trump is the most investigated President in the history of the Republic, and there is NADA, only petty BS the Dems will never hang on him.
3
@CelticTarotSheila Your assumption to intent is not enough to remove a sitting president from office, and must not be. Impeachment was designed to require bi-partisan support, and worked flawlessly with Nixon. The corruption in office and abuse of power is by the House. I'm embarrassed to say, I've been a Dem in California since 1974, but not for long.
2
George is still in shock over the Trump win, and has failed to fully understand and analyze the meaning of the win. Trump won with the help and support of the MSM that hate his guts. They only have themselves to blame, but don't have the guts to see it.
2
@CelticTarotSheila Disingenuous question, Christians are saved through grace, not by the adherence to the Ten Commandments. I believe something important occurred after Moses received those tablets. Did you hear about it?
2
@theodavis9778 Yes, American character is on display, Yang is the smartest candidate in the room, but being right is never enough, not by a long shot. I disagree with Yang on two points, open borders, and lowering the voting age to 16. Perhaps that's okay for local city and municipal elections, but I think for national office, the age should be raised to 25. Yes, I'm a boomer LOL
2
Yes, true, but you won't hear that from George. The corruption of the FISA process will haunt the Dems in November.
2
Yes, petty BS which says more about George and the MSM than about Trump. Candidate Trump and President Trump are the same, but George and MSM's bias has been exposed by the 2016 election. They are professional liars, and that's not hyperbole, it is fact.
2
Not true, there were a number of career State Dept. professionals who testified in the House, and many more who were disposed in the Mueller investigation we all paid for. NADA was found that rose to the level of impeachment, get over it.
1
Let's come back in mid-November and discuss it, okay?
1
Yes, and it was a full year before the Ambassador was removed, exonerating evidence that Trump did care about Ukrainian corruption and was working on it before Biden was a candidate, and it also supports the defense in he Senate which lays out Trump's anti-corruption campaign, something he ran on in 2016, and carrying out around the world. If he'd asked the new president of the Ukraine to fake something on Biden, I'd be with the Dems, but there's no need to fake anything on Biden, he's dirty, and so is Hunter, the evidence will roll out if Biden is the Dem choice. I predict an open Dem convention this summer. No more super delegates, HA. Will Michelle Obama be drafted and save the day for the Dems?
1
I'm a traditional Liberal, what George and the others are doing is just sheer childish. No, they are children, as proven by their actions.
1
Yes, even the President has the presumption of innocence before the law. You can't have it both ways, our legal system, thankfully, it is not designed that way.
1
voodoo_chili And Madeline Albright is still making millions in China after being Clinton's Sec of State... The Dems, double standards like these are only held by children.
1
Yes, enslaved by their own rhetoric, and GEORGE, the flop sweat is just pouring off your brow, you won't survive another 4 years of Trump without some thoughtful circumspection.
1
Like not handing over the transcript of the call???
1
Not only that, Obama gave Biden control over Ukraine policy while his son was working for Burisma, and with the money Hunter earned, he donated it to the campaign of Biden's other son, Bo. Don't forget John Carey's stepson was also over there with Burisma. "Debunked"? LOL, watch for it, all running in Trump campaign adds in swing counties and states.
1
I disagree, Schiff made false assertions that 2020 is in fact already illegitimate and Trump should not only be removed from office, but the ballot. That's a coup, pure and simple.
1
Apparently not, Trump will be acquitted and win in 2020. So much for your prayers.
1
LOL, Bolton fell back in Love with Trump when he followed Bolton's advice and took out Soleimani, and I'm betting the Dems know this and don't want him anywhere near the Senate trial. His book will sell, but not affect the election, we have a Teflon president who is a professional media personality, albeit, an amateur politician. 2020 has Trump running against amateurs.
1
@jayfree850 It's not about being smart. There's a "framework" in play, it has taken on the shape of a religion, with dogma and catechism, which says that the world is close to extinction because of the "patriarchy" and can only be saved by supplanting it with a "matriarchy" which is not gender specific. In the late 60's I bought into the notion that men and women should team up and share equally in the burdens of being human, but the new "framework" states that women are not only equal to men, but better, and must take charge of the new and diverse global culture of today. Like Amy keeps saying: "I'm a mom, I can multi-task." This framework is dangerously out of balance with nature, will fail, and is more destabilizing than climate change.
1
Evidence has just surfaced from Parnass that Trump started the investigation on Ukraine before Biden entered the election... and in fact, the defense showed clearly, and with evidence, that Trump was looking more closely at our allies corrupt behavior with our money than his predecessors, Obama, and that he cares more about Ukrainian defense than Obama, Trump gave them lethal support. I've been falsely accused and found myself in superior court with the police, who asked for my testimony, telling me in no uncertain terms they would lie in court about what I did if I did not testify for them. Even the Supreme Court recommends not speaking to the police, get a lawyer first. The President is presumed innocent before the law and is not required to testify against himself. You can't have it both ways.
1
Why should he answer that question, really? Will it help you wipe your tears away? Grow up!
1
Because the Dems were unwilling to go to court, instead, they celebrated Xmas and are now in a battle for 2020.
1
I get it, LOL
1
I have let my Senator, Feinstein of California, who knows this is a sham, and has walked out early, to at long last see the emperors Pelosi and Schiff have no clothes, for them to stop crying wolf, end the perpetual impeachment hysteria because they lost an election to a media clown, and get on with the business of the people.
1
Too late, I did just the opposite. I prefer to vote, not let Schiff decide for me.
1
I didn't hear that, not at all.
1
Explain that. That's a Dem talking point, but I don't see what leverage Trump has at this point, he needs them more than they need him. In fact, for swing state Senators, it's better if Trump stays out of their race. If Trump is that popular in OK, then that's the leverage, which is our political process, are you against it? HA, that leverage has always worked both ways in our two-party system, the king of it was LBJ, and Dem.
1
As long as you believe your own delusion, you will lose in 2020, and you will get another 4 years of Trump, and most likely, he gets two more Supreme Court Justices, a Senate majority, and a House with Dems more fearful of their jobs than GOPs.
1
That'll all role out in swing states and counties this summer, it's in the works. The Dems are amateurs in MSM, Trump is the pro, he owns the room. I'm not saying this is a good thing, just a fact. George needs to look at himself in the mirror for a good long time.
1
Check the number the public is not watching the sham, and Trump's numbers are the highest they've ever been. Look at a graph from October to January showing public for removal in October, in January, not so much... Trump wins, you lose, again. Why?
1