Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "The End Of Democrats Using Systemic Racism To Get Votes? (Pt.1)| Rob Smith | POLITICS | Rubin Report" video.
-
7
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Really, I thought Jefferson signed the Act ending the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade in 1807? If you said 1896, I might agree, with the Plessy v Ferguson ruling. The decision was 1st successfully challenged 50 years later in the Mendez v. Westminster case, not far from me in Santa Ana, California, a decade before Brown. The "systemic" system was never monolithic, and was constantly being fought and challenged. Sounds like basic human behavior to me, not some Deep State conspiracy. Are there after effects, absolutely. Should there be some form of repair? I believe so, but what would that be, and how would it be applied? Many communities and individuals suffered "systemic" exclusion, how should that injustice be repaired?
1
-
1
-
@griz063 Sure, but no secret, BLM is on record as Structural Marxists, which is no "evil", just human, and not so "neo", or "post-modern" as coined by the so-called "Dark Web". But as in my day, there are very few Marxists on the streets, almost all are in Academia. Ironically, "sinister" is defined as something "evil" on, or coming from the left", look it up LMAO. : "Sinister has an etymology that might seem a bit biased against the left-handed portion of the population, as this word, which has had naught but disagreeable meanings for over five hundred years now, comes from a Latin word of the same spelling that means “on the left side.” We find this root in other English words, such as the adjective sinistral (“left-handed”) and the adverb sinistrad (“toward the left side”). "
1
-
@griz063 I won't debate the "post-modern" part of your equation, since it encompasses Art, Music, Literature, and only secondarily, politics. As for "neo-Marxism", I see what's on the street more in line with autonomist Marxism, and within Academia, as the Empiricist took power from the clerics, a kind of 3rd Wave Christian reformation took place, with Karl Marx as God-Head, his only begotten son, who died for our sins, Che Guevara, as the new Christ. You can see that iconography all over campuses in the Western world. It is a religion, with Dogma, Catechism, Inquisition, and Ex-Communication. People like JBP and Haidt see its beginnings in the 1990's, but in my experience, it began about 1968, and started gaining real bureaucratic power with my peers in the mid-1970's. The bitter seeds of the "Long March" are just now bearing fruit. But the fruit is puny and lacks energy. Herbert Marcuse was right, no revolution for America, got to get to the kids.
1
-
@griz063 Sure, I have a neighbor in my condo who is a PhD at a major university, he's been in "ethnic studies" since 1982 and became chair of his dept 15 years ago. We've discussed critical theory many times, and one of the tactics of the new "clerics", is Qualitative Methodology" which is purported to be the EQ of empirical evidence, except the human subject can change their data at anytime, and for any reason, even in a longitudinal study, because that's only "ethical". So they are now pushing anecdote as scientific evidence. My neighbor gave me an evil smile and said, "just wait, we are making inroads in the STEM courses, too. And they are.
1
-
1
-
@griz063 Yes, and I totally agree, the idea of "Other Ways of Knowing" crept into Academia with the New Agers during the 1970's, and hopefully, without blowing a dog whistle, 2nd Wave Feminism. Feminist Theory is 3rd rail subject matter, but will have to be addressed if the tide is to be stemmed. I am currently not focused on issues of Ontology or Truth. My focus is on the moment, as we are lucky to be conscious beings at a time when the crack in our cosmic egg has begun. For some, it's an ending, for others, it's a beginning, both are true. We have the agency to choose which truth to act on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1