Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "Piers Morgan vs Mohammed Hijab On Palestine and Israel-Hamas War | The Full Debate" video.

  1. "personal attack"? I did not hear any, but did hear Hijab compare 1973 war to what just happened, factually incorrect and contrary to primary sources.
    5
  2. Malcolm X, murdered by his own people, even Muhammad Ali has disavowed the Nation of Islam and became a Sufi who loved his Christian and Jewish brothers.
    4
  3.  @mussabkamhieh549  Ah, "stealing land". Does that mean the end of Israel? That's what Hijab really wants, but doesn't have the guts to say. 5 Arab countries went after Israel in 1948 and lost. Choices have consequences. The world voted in favor of the Israeli State. Egypt and Jordan have recognized that State, the Saudis are close to doing the same. Hijab will never do that, neither will Hamas, they are the same.
    4
  4. Hijab is controversial, he makes his living by being controversial. In this interview he made statements that were not only controversial, but academically unsound and lacks factual foundation, like comparing the 1973 war with this terrorist attack.
    3
  5. Hijab compared 1973 war to what just happened, factually incorrect, and previously stated America declared war on Germany first, another lie, but you agree with him. Liars will have no peace.
    3
  6. I saw the exact opposite happen, like when Hijab compared the 1973 war to Hamas terrorism and taking of children as hostages. That did not happen in 1973, so Hijab is just one big intellectual fallacy machine.
    2
  7. If you believe there's been an occupation since 1948, that means Israel has the legal right under international law to defend itself. Both you and Hijab display the fallacy and internal contradiction of logic at the very foundation the argument. I ask you: Was Israel formed as a legal nation in 1948 under international law. Will you recognize the legal right of Israel to exist? Are there any borders in the region you would recognize, or should it be one pan-Arab Muslim Caliphate?
    2
  8. Hijab makes it clear he believes the State of Israel is an occupying power on all the land, not just Gaza and the West Bank. so clearly sides with the charter and goals of Hamas. Piers Morgan did not ask that direct question?
    1
  9. Hijab compared 1973 war to what just happened. Please "fact check" that.
    1
  10. Research Hijab, he is disingenuous in this interview. He claimed in interview with Jordan Peterson that America declared war on Germany first. His Oxford education is grossly flawed. Also research the 9th Century Islamic Law: DHIMMIS. This is how you will be treated as a non-Muslim in an Islamic State.
    1
  11. Hijab compared 1973 to what just happened. Factual incorrect. Why do you trust him after that fallacious statement he knows very well is false.
    1
  12. 1973 was state against state combatants, Hijab, you know that. Again, you hide your believe Israel itself is an illegal State in the region and must be destroyed. Just say the quiet part out loud, for once, just say it.
    1
  13. @@ahmedhakeem6799 His final words in this interview was to compare 1973 to now. Did you not listen to the entire interview? Hijab did nothing BUT debate the history of "occupation", making it clear he believes Israel itself is illegal. I've not just listened to him here.
    1
  14. Jews were the majority in Jerusalem in the 1880s, indigenous to the land, the State of Israel was planned before the Nazi Party came to power, and the British started restricting immigration by Jews in the 1920s at the same time Arabs began killing Jews. It's not all about the Holocaust. Learn about Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, his agreement with Hitler in 1941, and the Muslim Brotherhood. All predates 1947/48
    1
  15. Hijab did the interrupting, even interrupted the intro. You, as always, have it backwards.
    1
  16. he answered many questions but they were not accepted by Hijab.
    1
  17. HMS/Hamas is an acronym for Islamic Residence, it's goal is clearly stated in its charter. It is ISIS/ISIL in Gaza, and fought a war with Fatah over this ideology. Hijab is incorrect, and he knows it.
    1
  18. So you are in support of terrorist tactics? In the example given, if you were trapped in the bathroom and the occupier's child came in, would you be justified in using that child as a human shield to escape and kill the occupier?
    1
  19. Hijab compared 1973 war to what just happened. He clearly does have access to primary sources but ignores them, as he will do with what just happened.
    1