Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "Why Fiona Hill is worried about a return of Donald Trump in 2024 | DW News" video.

"Energy Transition", again, pure fantasy, as China moves forward with technology created in the US more than 50 years ago: 10 September 2021 China prepares to test thorium-fueled nuclear reactor. If China’s experimental reactor is a success it could lead to commercialization and help the nation meet its climate goals.
18
Yes, the more they hate him, the more they talk about him, speaks to their incoherence, not his.
7
"Knowledge economy left them behind", spoken like a true Harvard educated elitist living in the fantasy we are all one world and must evolve into new beings. A deluded, science denying framework of what evolution is, and how long it takes.
7
Harvard is kinky for Brits and Russian spies, makes perfect sense.
5
And now she wrote a book and cashes in on her performance, brilliant!
2
Viola! Trump 2024!!!!
1
@alexleanh Yes, I need to take a bike ride or something, thanks for pointing it out, doesn't make what I said any less true, however.
1
Hillary never accepted loss in 2016 and engineered the 4-year impeachment war against a legally elected president, that was the constitutional crisis, not the 3-hour rant by a few mentally deranged people on Jan/6. Trump received almost as many votes in 2020 as Hillary did in 2016, we are a divided country, no doubt, but our constitution is strong, and has weathered worse, much worse.
1
@Fruehlingseffekt Not mine, never touch it.
1
@alexleanh Yes, mad-crazy, no question, so thanks for being the adult in the room.
1
@alexleanh This tech is not new, invented in the 1960s.This reactor is walk-away-safe, even in an earthquake or hurricane, if the reactor is not "feed" it turns off automatically. This video is about missiles, but the gap is with energy, not arms.
1
@alexleanh Yeah, there is rigorous work being done while others talk, have conferences, or demonstrate in the streets. The more serious gap is energy, not missiles.
1
@piotrtrebisz6602 Yeah, been watching the Canadians invest, you and I know there are many approaches, some can be used now as hybrids while issues are worked out. The fact these things can be built offsite as modular units and shipped where needed make it a great solution for countries without much money or tech. I live near one of the largest ports and ship building facilities in the world. We could build them and ship them almost anywhere in the world where there's a port, and when the the fuel is spent, the modular unit can be exchanged like a big battery. I know there are serious issues with cost/benefit, but that ratio will change in favor of this energy source. The US, Canada, Australia, and India need to be on it.
1
@piotrtrebisz6602 Cannibis, more than 50 years, and still not legal by Fed.
1
@piotrtrebisz6602 Can't agree, I am in California, in 1970, I told my high school guidance counselor I was going to patent the names "Acapulco Gold" and "Panama Red" for when cannabis became legal, which I thought was only a few years out. In the last 50 years I've changed my views on both cannabis and "d"emocracy. The recent election in NYC and the recall here in California has been chaotic and unproductive, a pure democracy is anything but pure. I marched in the streets to get the vote lowered to 18, and was in the first wave of 18 year-old voters in 1974. I now believe the voting age for Federal elections should be raised to 25, and also the age to consume cannabis; the science is clear, the human brain, especially the judgement neurology, does not fully mature until that age. Males, especially, should not be consuming cannabis until after age 25, or better, 30. If you look at the data, and the science, and not your feelings, these restrictions would be productive. The Westphalian Peace agreements are still valid, and a hierarchical system of decision making still fits the human animal as currently configured by evolution.
1